Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;31(8):2101-2106. doi: 10.1111/jce.14595. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
In patients with endocarditis and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), lead extraction is recommended according to current guidelines. In patients with short lead implant duration, lead extraction by manual traction might be sufficient for intraoperative lead removal. However, in patients with long implant duration, specialized extraction tools like laser or mechanical rotational sheaths are necessary. We report our experience with transvenous lead extraction during concomitant cardiac surgery for valvular endocarditis using mechanical rotational sheaths.
Between December 2018 and April 2020, 12 patients were treated with transvenous lead extraction during open-heart surgery using mechanical rotational sheaths. Cardiac surgery was performed due to mitral, aortic, or tricuspid valve endocarditis. All patient-related and procedural data were collected, and in-hospital outcome was analyzed retrospectively. Mean patients' age was 65.2 ± 16.4 years, and 75.0% were male. Nine atrial, 15 ventricular, and 2 coronary sinus leads had to be extracted. The mean time from initial lead implantation was 94.3 ± 39.7 months. Complete procedural success was achieved in all patients with no major but one minor complication (pocket hematoma) occurring during lead extraction. Four patients with pacemaker dependency received epicardial leads, seven patients were treated in a two-step approach with endocardial leads, whereas one patient had no further CIED indication. No procedure-related mortality was seen. In-hospital survival was 91.7%.
Valvular endocarditis surgery in combination with lead extraction using mechanical rotational sheaths is safe and feasible. It results in a high procedural success rate with prompt infection control by immediate removal of all infected lead materials.
对于患有心内膜炎和心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的患者,根据现行指南建议进行导线拔除。对于植入导线时间较短的患者,手动牵引可能足以进行术中导线移除。然而,对于植入时间较长的患者,需要使用专门的提取工具,如激光或机械旋转鞘。我们报告了在心脏瓣膜心内膜炎手术中使用机械旋转鞘进行经静脉导线拔除的经验。
在 2018 年 12 月至 2020 年 4 月期间,有 12 名患者在心脏直视手术中使用机械旋转鞘进行经静脉导线拔除。心脏手术是由于二尖瓣、主动脉瓣或三尖瓣心内膜炎而进行的。收集了所有与患者相关和手术过程的数据,并回顾性分析了住院结果。患者的平均年龄为 65.2±16.4 岁,75.0%为男性。需要拔除 9 根心房导线、15 根心室导线和 2 根冠状窦导线。初始植入导线的平均时间为 94.3±39.7 个月。所有患者均成功完成手术,无主要并发症,但有 1 例轻微并发症(囊袋血肿)。4 名依赖起搏器的患者接受了心外膜导线,7 名患者采用心内膜导线两步法治疗,1 名患者无进一步的 CIED 指征。无手术相关死亡。住院期间生存率为 91.7%。
在使用机械旋转鞘进行瓣膜心内膜炎手术的同时进行导线拔除是安全可行的。通过立即移除所有感染的导线材料,迅速控制感染,可获得高的手术成功率。