School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Accademia Lombarda di Sanità Pubblica, Consorzio Pavese Studi Post-Universitari, Unit of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 25;17(10):3738. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103738.
Depression is a major contributor to the overall global burden of disease, with high prevalence and relapse rate. Several factors have been considered in order to reduce the depression burden. Among them, physical activity (PA) showed a potential protective role. However, evidence is contrasting probably because of the differences in PA measurement. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to assess the association between objectively measured PA and incident and prevalent depression. The systematic review was conducted according to methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant papers published through 31 August 2019 were identified searching through the electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (Embase), PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and the Cochrane Library. All analyses were conducted using ProMeta3. Finally, 42 studies met inclusion criteria. The overall Effect size (ES) of depression for the highest vs. the lowest level of PA was -1.16 [(95% CI = -1.41; -0.91), -value < 0.001] based on 37,408 participants. The results of the meta-analysis showed a potential protective effect of PA on prevalent and incident depression.
抑郁症是全球疾病总负担的主要因素之一,其患病率和复发率都很高。为了降低抑郁症负担,人们考虑了多种因素。其中,身体活动(PA)显示出了潜在的保护作用。然而,由于 PA 测量方法的不同,证据存在差异。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估客观测量的 PA 与新发和现患抑郁症之间的关联。系统评价按照 Cochrane 协作组织和系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南推荐的方法进行。通过电子数据库 PubMed/MEDLINE、Excerpta Medica dataBASE(Embase)、PsycINFO、Scopus、Web of Science(WoS)和 Cochrane Library,检索到截至 2019 年 8 月 31 日发表的相关论文。使用 ProMeta3 进行所有分析。最终,有 42 项研究符合纳入标准。基于 37408 名参与者,PA 最高水平与最低水平相比,抑郁的总体效应大小(ES)为-1.16(95%CI=-1.41;-0.91),-值<0.001。荟萃分析的结果表明,PA 对现患和新发抑郁症有潜在的保护作用。