Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, California, USA
Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 May;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000590.
Little has been published regarding the relationship between physical activity (PA) and outpatient treated, mild to moderate acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (AECOPD). The purpose of this study was to determine the association between self-reported PA and outpatient treated AECOPD over 2 years using real-world data obtained from existing electronic medical records (EMRs).
We included 44 896 patients with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis from the EMR in this retrospective cohort study. Moderate to vigorous PA was measured via patient self-report, obtained during routine clinical care; patients were classified as inactive (0 min/week), insufficiently active (1-149 min/week) or active (≥150 min/week). AECOPDs were measured using both encounter and prescription fill (antibiotics and/or oral steroids) data. We used Poisson regression models to compare the unadjusted and adjusted rates of outpatient treated AECOPD over 2 years across the PA categories.
In adjusted models, the 2-year AECOPD incidence rate ratio (IRR) was not different between the inactive and insufficiently inactive groups (IRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.01) and only marginally meaningful lower for the active group (IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98). Sensitivity analyses of patients meeting or not meeting obstructive criteria produced similar results with generally weak or non-significant associations.
The lack of an association between PA and AECOPD contrasts with previous published findings of a strong relationship between moderate to vigorous PA and hospitalisations for severe AECOPD. This difference could partially be attributed to the imprecision of our measurements for both the exposure and outcome.
关于体力活动(PA)与门诊治疗的轻度至中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)之间的关系,发表的内容很少。本研究的目的是使用从现有电子病历(EMR)中获得的真实世界数据,确定自我报告的 PA 与 2 年内门诊治疗的 AECOPD 之间的关联。
我们纳入了这项回顾性队列研究中 EMR 中 44896 例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者。通过患者在常规临床护理期间的自我报告来衡量中度至剧烈的体力活动;将患者分为不活跃(每周 0 分钟)、活动不足(每周 1-149 分钟)或活跃(每周≥150 分钟)。AECOPD 是通过就诊和处方填写(抗生素和/或口服类固醇)数据来衡量的。我们使用泊松回归模型比较了 PA 类别下 2 年内门诊治疗 AECOPD 的未经调整和调整后的发生率比(IRR)。
在调整后的模型中,不活跃和活动不足组的 2 年 AECOPD 发生率比(IRR)没有差异(IRR 0.98,95%CI 0.96 至 1.01),而活跃组的 IRR 仅略低(IRR 0.97,95%CI 0.95 至 0.98)。符合或不符合阻塞性标准的患者的敏感性分析得出了相似的结果,总体上关联较弱或无统计学意义。
PA 与 AECOPD 之间缺乏关联与之前发表的中度至剧烈 PA 与严重 AECOPD 住院之间存在强烈关联的发现形成对比。这种差异部分归因于我们对暴露和结局的测量不精确。