Suppr超能文献

加速度计测量的体力活动和久坐时间与全因死亡率之间的剂量-反应关系:系统评价和协调荟萃分析。

Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO Box 4014, Ullevål Stadion, 0806 Oslo, Norway

Department of Chronic Diseases and Ageing, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ. 2019 Aug 21;366:l4570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4570.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the dose-response associations between accelerometer assessed total physical activity, different intensities of physical activity, and sedentary time and all cause mortality.

DESIGN

Systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, Sport Discus from inception to 31 July 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Prospective cohort studies assessing physical activity and sedentary time by accelerometry and associations with all cause mortality and reported effect estimates as hazard ratios, odds ratios, or relative risks with 95% confidence intervals.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews for observational studies and PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts. One author performed a full text review and another extracted the data. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias. Individual level participant data were harmonised and analysed at study level. Data on physical activity were categorised by quarters at study level, and study specific associations with all cause mortality were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Study specific results were summarised using random effects meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

All cause mortality.

RESULTS

39 studies were retrieved for full text review; 10 were eligible for inclusion, three were excluded owing to harmonisation challenges (eg, wrist placement of the accelerometer), and one study did not participate. Two additional studies with unpublished mortality data were also included. Thus, individual level data from eight studies (n=36 383; mean age 62.6 years; 72.8% women), with median follow-up of 5.8 years (range 3.0-14.5 years) and 2149 (5.9%) deaths were analysed. Any physical activity, regardless of intensity, was associated with lower risk of mortality, with a non-linear dose-response. Hazards ratios for mortality were 1.00 (referent) in the first quarter (least active), 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.54) in the second quarter, 0.34 (0.26 to 0.45) in the third quarter, and 0.27 (0.23 to 0.32) in the fourth quarter (most active). Corresponding hazards ratios for light physical activity were 1.00, 0.60 (0.54 to 0.68), 0.44 (0.38 to 0.51), and 0.38 (0.28 to 0.51), and for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were 1.00, 0.64 (0.55 to 0.74), 0.55 (0.40 to 0.74), and 0.52 (0.43 to 0.61). For sedentary time, hazards ratios were 1.00 (referent; least sedentary), 1.28 (1.09 to 1.51), 1.71 (1.36 to 2.15), and 2.63 (1.94 to 3.56).

CONCLUSION

Higher levels of total physical activity, at any intensity, and less time spent sedentary, are associated with substantially reduced risk for premature mortality, with evidence of a non-linear dose-response pattern in middle aged and older adults.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018091808.

摘要

目的

研究加速度计评估的总身体活动、不同强度的身体活动和久坐时间与全因死亡率之间的剂量-反应关系。

设计

系统评价和协调荟萃分析。

数据来源

从创建到 2018 年 7 月 31 日,PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase、Web of Science 和 Sport Discus。

入选标准

前瞻性队列研究,通过加速度计评估身体活动和久坐时间,并报告与全因死亡率相关的效应估计值,如危险比、优势比或相对风险,置信区间为 95%。

数据提取和分析

遵循荟萃分析和系统评价的指南以及观察性研究的 PRISMA 指南。两名作者独立筛选标题和摘要。一名作者进行了全文审查,另一名作者提取了数据。两名作者独立评估了偏倚风险。个人层面的参与者数据在研究层面进行了协调和分析。数据按研究层面的季度进行分类,使用 Cox 比例风险回归分析研究特定的与全因死亡率的相关性。使用随机效应荟萃分析总结研究特定结果。

主要观察指标

全因死亡率。

结果

检索了 39 篇全文进行审查;10 项符合纳入标准,3 项因协调挑战(例如,加速度计的手腕位置)而被排除,1 项研究未参与。还纳入了另外两项具有未发表死亡率数据的研究。因此,分析了来自 8 项研究(n=36383;平均年龄 62.6 岁;72.8%为女性)的个体水平数据,中位随访时间为 5.8 年(范围 3.0-14.5 年)和 2149 例(5.9%)死亡。任何强度的身体活动都与较低的死亡率风险相关,呈非线性剂量反应关系。死亡率的危险比为 1.00(参照)在第一季度(最不活跃),0.48(95%置信区间 0.43 至 0.54)在第二季度,0.34(0.26 至 0.45)在第三季度,0.27(0.23 至 0.32)在第四季度(最活跃)。相应的轻体力活动的危险比为 1.00、0.60(0.54 至 0.68)、0.44(0.38 至 0.51)和 0.38(0.28 至 0.51),而中度至剧烈体力活动的危险比为 1.00、0.64(0.55 至 0.74)、0.55(0.40 至 0.74)和 0.52(0.43 至 0.61)。对于久坐时间,危险比为 1.00(参照;最不活跃)、1.28(1.09 至 1.51)、1.71(1.36 至 2.15)和 2.63(1.94 至 3.56)。

结论

在中年和老年人中,任何强度的更高水平的总身体活动和更少的久坐时间与过早死亡的风险显著降低相关,证据表明存在非线性剂量反应模式。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42018091808。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/312d/6699591/cfb2fe43f699/ekeu048737.f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验