Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):46-49. doi: 10.1002/hast.1113. Epub 2020 May 28.
The Covid-19 pandemic needs to be considered from two perspectives simultaneously. First, there are questions about which policies are most effective and fair in the here and now, as the pandemic unfolds. These polices concern, for example, who should receive priority in being tested, how to implement contact tracing, or how to decide who should get ventilators or vaccines when not all can. Second, it is imperative to anticipate the medium- and longer-term consequences that these policies have. The case of vaccine rationing is particularly instructive. Ethical, epidemiological, and economic reasons demand that rationing approaches give priority to groups who have been structurally and historically disadvantaged, even if this means that overall life years gained may be lower.
新冠疫情需要从两个角度同时考虑。首先,随着疫情的发展,现在有哪些政策是最有效和公平的,这是一个问题。这些政策涉及到例如,谁应该优先接受检测,如何实施接触者追踪,或者当不是所有人都能获得时,应该如何决定谁应该获得呼吸机或疫苗。其次,必须预料到这些政策的中期和长期后果。疫苗配给的情况尤其具有启发性。从伦理、流行病学和经济角度来看,配给方法应该优先考虑那些在结构上和历史上处于不利地位的群体,即使这意味着获得的总寿命可能较低。