Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.
Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):533-541. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1766704.
The aims of this study were to evaluate a semi-automatic segmentation software for assessment of ablation zone geometry in computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) of liver tumors and to compare two different MWA systems. 27 patients with 40 hepatic tumors (primary liver tumor = 20, metastases = 20) referred for CT-guided MWA were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. MWA was performed using two systems (system 1: 915 MHz; = 20; system 2: 2.45 GHz; = 20). Ablation zone segmentation and ellipticity index calculations were performed using SAFIR (Software Assistant for Interventional Radiology). To validate semi-automatic software calculations, results (2 perpendicular diameters, ellipticity index, volume) were compared with those of manual analysis (intraclass correlation, Pearson's correlation, Mann-Whitney test; < 0.05 deemed significant. Manual measurements of mean maximum ablation zone diameters were 43 mm (system 1) and 34 mm (system 2), respectively. Correlations between manual and semi-automatic measurements were = 0.72 and = 0.66 (both < 0.0001) for perpendicular diameters, and = 0.98 ( < 0.001) for volume. Manual analysis demonstrated that ablation zones created with system 2 had a significantly lower ellipticity index compared to system 1 (mean 1.17 vs. 1.86, < 0.0001). Results correlated significantly with semi-automatic software measurements ( = 0.71, < 0.0001). Semi-automatic assessment of ablation zone geometry using SAFIR is feasible. Software-assisted evaluation of ablation zones may prove beneficial with complex ablation procedures, especially for less experienced operators. The 2.45 GHz MWA system generated a significantly more spherical ablation zone compared to the 915 MHz system. The choice of a specific MWA system significantly influences ablation zone geometry.
本研究旨在评估一种用于评估计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下微波消融(MWA)治疗肝肿瘤消融区域几何形状的半自动分割软件,并比较两种不同的 MWA 系统。这项回顾性 IRB 批准的研究纳入了 27 例 40 个肝肿瘤患者(原发性肝癌 20 例,转移性肝癌 20 例)。采用两种系统(系统 1:915MHz,n=20;系统 2:2.45GHz,n=20)进行 MWA。使用 SAFIR(介入放射学辅助软件)进行消融区域分割和椭圆率指数计算。为了验证半自动软件计算,将结果(2 个垂直直径、椭圆率指数、体积)与手动分析结果进行比较(组内相关系数、Pearson 相关系数、Mann-Whitney U 检验;p<0.05 认为差异具有统计学意义)。手动测量的平均最大消融区域直径分别为系统 1 的 43mm 和系统 2 的 34mm。手动和半自动测量的相关性分别为垂直直径的 = 0.72 和 = 0.66(均 p<0.0001),体积的 = 0.98(p<0.001)。手动分析显示,与系统 1 相比,系统 2 产生的消融区域的椭圆率指数明显更低(平均 1.17 对 1.86,p<0.0001)。结果与半自动软件测量显著相关(p<0.0001)。使用 SAFIR 半自动评估消融区域几何形状是可行的。软件辅助评估消融区域可能对复杂消融程序有益,尤其是对经验较少的操作人员。与 915MHz 系统相比,2.45GHz MWA 系统产生的消融区域更接近球形。特定 MWA 系统的选择会显著影响消融区域的几何形状。