R. Ma, J. Mandell, F. Lu, T. Heim, R. Watters, K. R. Weiss, Musculoskeletal Oncology Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
R. Ma, F. Lu, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Mar 1;479(3):477-490. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001317.
In high-grade chondrosarcoma, 5-year survival is lower than 50%. Therefore, it is important that preclinical models that mimic the disease with the greatest possible fidelity are used to potentially develop new treatments. Accumulating evidence suggests that two-dimensional (2-D) cell culture may not accurately represent the tumor's biology. It has been demonstrated in other cancers that three-dimensional (3-D) cancer cell spheroids may recapitulate tumor biology and response to treatment with greater fidelity than traditional 2-D techniques. To our knowledge, the formation of patient-derived chondrosarcoma spheroids has not been described.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Can patient-derived chondrosarcoma spheroids be produced? (2) Do spheroids recapitulate human chondrosarcoma better than 2-D cultures, both morphologically and molecularly? (3) Can chondrosarcoma spheroids provide an accurate model to test novel treatments?
Experiments to test the feasibility of spheroid formation of chondrosarcoma cells were performed using HT-1080, an established chondrosarcoma cell line, and two patient-derived populations, TP19-S26 and TP19-S115. Cells were cultured in flasks, trypsinized, and seeded into 96-well ultra-low attachment plates with culture media. After spheroids formed, they were monitored daily by bright-field microscopy. Spheroids were fixed using paraformaldehyde and embedded in agarose. After dehydration with isopropanol, paraffin-embedded spheroids were sectioned, and slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. To compare differences and similarities in gene expression between 2-D and 3-D chondrosarcoma cultures and primary tumors, and to determine whether these spheroids recapitulated the biology of chondrosarcoma, RNA was extracted from 2-D cultures, spheroids, and tumors. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed to detect chondrosarcoma markers of interest, including vascular endothelial growth factor alpha, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, COL2A1, and COL10A1. To determine whether 2-D and 3-D cultures responded differently to novel chondrosarcoma treatments, we compared their sensitivities to disulfiram and copper chloride treatment. To test their sensitivity to disulfiram and copper chloride treatment, 10,000 cells were seeded into 96-well plates for 2-D culturing and 3000 cells in each well for 3-D culturing. After treating the cells with disulfiram and copper for 48 hours, we detected cell viability using quantitative presto-blue staining and measured via plate reader.
Cell-line and patient-derived spheroids were cultured and monitored over 12 days. Qualitatively, we observed that HT-1080 demonstrated unlimited growth, while TP19-S26 and TP19-S115 contracted during culturing relative to their initial size. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of HT-1080 spheroids revealed that cell-cell attachments were more pronounced at the periphery of the spheroid structure than at the core, while the core was less dense. Spheroids derived from the intermediate-grade chondrosarcoma TP19-S26 were abundant in extracellular matrix, and spheroids derived from the dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma TP19-S115 had a higher cellularity and heterogeneity with spindle cells at the periphery. In the HT-1080 cells, differences in gene expression were appreciated with spheroids demonstrating greater expressions of VEGF-α (1.01 ± 0.16 versus 6.48 ± 0.55; p = 0.003), COL2A1 (1.00 ± 0.10 versus 7.46 ± 2.52; p < 0.001), and COL10A1 (1.01 ± 0.19 versus 22.53 ± 4.91; p < 0.001). Differences in gene expressions were also noted between primary tumors, spheroids, and 2-D cultures in the patient-derived samples TP19-S26 and TP19-S115. TP19-S26 is an intermediate-grade chondrosarcoma. With the numbers we had, we could not detect a difference in VEGF-α and HIF1α gene expression compared with the primary tumor. COL2A1 (1.00 ± 0.14 versus 1.76 ± 0.10 versus 335.66 ± 31.13) and COL10A1 (1.06 ± 0.378 versus 5.98 ± 0.45 versus 138.82 ± 23.4) expressions were both greater in the tumor (p (COL2A1) < 0.001; p (COL10A1) < 0.0001) and 3-D cultures (p (COL2A1) = 0.004; p (COL10A1) < 0.0001) compared with 2-D cultures. We could not demonstrate a difference in VEGF-α and HIF1α expressions in TP19-S115, a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, in the tumor compared with 2-D and 3-D cultures. COL2A1 (1.00 ± 0.02 versus 1.86 ± 0.18 versus 2.95 ± 0.56) and COL10A1 (1.00 ± 0.03 versus 5.52 ± 0.66 versus 3.79 ± 0.36) expressions were both greater in spheroids (p (COL2A1) = 0.003; p (COL10A1) < 0.0001) and tumors (p (COL2A1) < 0.001; p (COL10A1) < 0.0001) compared with 2-D cultures. Disulfiram-copper chloride treatment demonstrated high cytotoxicity in HT-1080 and SW-1353 chondrosarcoma cells grown in the 2-D monolayer, but 3-D spheroids were highly resistant to this treatment.
We provide preliminary findings that it is possible to generate 3-D spheroids from chondrosarcoma cell lines and two human chondrosarcomas (one dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma and one intermediate-grade chondrosarcoma). Chondrosarcoma spheroids derived from human tumors demonstrated morphology more reminiscent of primary tumors than cells grown in 2-D culture. Spheroids displayed similar expressions of cartilage markers as the primary tumor, and we observed a higher expression of collagen markers in the spheroids compared with cells grown in monolayer. Spheroids also demonstrated greater chemotherapy resistance than monolayer cells, but more patient-derived spheroids are needed to further conclude that 3-D cultures may mimic the chemoresistance that chondrosarcomas demonstrate clinically. Additional studies on patient-derived chondrosarcoma spheroids are warranted.
Chondrosarcomas demonstrate resistance to chemotherapy and radiation, and we believe that if they can be replicated, models such as 3-D spheroids may provide a method to test novel treatments for human chondrosarcoma. Additional comprehensive genomic studies are required to compare 2-D and 3-D models with the primary tumor to determine the most effective way to study this disease in vitro.
高级别软骨肉瘤的 5 年生存率低于 50%。因此,使用尽可能真实地模拟疾病的临床前模型来潜在地开发新的治疗方法非常重要。越来越多的证据表明,二维(2-D)细胞培养可能无法准确反映肿瘤的生物学特性。在其他癌症中已经证明,三维(3-D)癌细胞球体可能比传统的 2-D 技术更真实地再现肿瘤生物学和对治疗的反应。据我们所知,患者来源的软骨肉瘤球体的形成尚未被描述。
问题/目的:(1)能否产生患者来源的软骨肉瘤球体?(2)球体在形态学和分子水平上是否比 2-D 培养更能重现人类软骨肉瘤?(3)软骨肉瘤球体能否提供一个准确的模型来测试新的治疗方法?
使用 HT-1080(一种已建立的软骨肉瘤细胞系)和两个患者来源的群体 TP19-S26 和 TP19-S115,进行了测试软骨肉瘤细胞球体形成可行性的实验。细胞在培养瓶中培养、用胰蛋白酶消化,并接种到含有培养基的 96 孔超低附着平板中。形成球体后,每天通过明场显微镜进行监测。用多聚甲醛固定球体,并用琼脂糖包埋。用异丙醇进行脱水后,将石蜡包埋的球体切成薄片,并用苏木精和伊红染色。为了比较 2-D 和 3-D 软骨肉瘤培养物和原发性肿瘤之间的基因表达差异和相似性,并确定这些球体是否再现了软骨肉瘤的生物学特性,从 2-D 培养物、球体和肿瘤中提取了 RNA。进行定量聚合酶链反应以检测感兴趣的软骨肉瘤标志物,包括血管内皮生长因子 alpha(VEGF-α)、缺氧诱导因子 1α(HIF1α)、COL2A1 和 COL10A1。为了确定 2-D 和 3-D 培养物对新的软骨肉瘤治疗的反应是否不同,我们比较了它们对二硫化四乙基秋兰姆(disulfiram)和氯化铜的敏感性。为了测试它们对二硫化四乙基秋兰姆和氯化铜的敏感性,将 10000 个细胞接种到 96 孔板中进行 2-D 培养,将 3000 个细胞接种到每个孔中进行 3-D 培养。用二硫化四乙基秋兰姆和铜处理细胞 48 小时后,我们使用定量 presto-blue 染色检测细胞活力,并通过平板读数仪进行测量。
培养并监测了细胞系和患者来源的球体超过 12 天。定性地,我们观察到 HT-1080 表现出无限生长,而 TP19-S26 和 TP19-S115 在培养过程中相对于其初始大小收缩。HT-1080 球体的苏木精和伊红染色显示,球体结构的外围细胞间连接更为明显,而核心则不太密集。来源于中间级软骨肉瘤 TP19-S26 的球体富含细胞外基质,而来源于去分化软骨肉瘤 TP19-S115 的球体则具有更高的细胞密度和异质性,外围有纺锤形细胞。在 HT-1080 细胞中,观察到球体的基因表达存在差异,VEGF-α(1.01 ± 0.16 对 6.48 ± 0.55;p = 0.003)、COL2A1(1.00 ± 0.10 对 7.46 ± 2.52;p < 0.001)和 COL10A1(1.01 ± 0.19 对 22.53 ± 4.91;p < 0.001)的表达均更高。在患者来源的 TP19-S26 和 TP19-S115 样本中,初级肿瘤、球体和 2-D 培养物之间的基因表达也存在差异。TP19-S26 是一种中间级软骨肉瘤。由于我们拥有的样本数量,我们无法检测到 VEGF-α 和 HIF1α 基因表达与原发性肿瘤相比的差异。COL2A1(1.00 ± 0.14 对 1.76 ± 0.10 对 335.66 ± 31.13)和 COL10A1(1.06 ± 0.378 对 5.98 ± 0.45 对 138.82 ± 23.4)的表达在肿瘤(p(COL2A1)<0.001;p(COL10A1)<0.0001)和 3-D 培养物(p(COL2A1)= 0.004;p(COL10A1)<0.0001)中均更高。我们无法在软骨肉瘤 TP19-S115(一种去分化软骨肉瘤)中检测到肿瘤与 2-D 和 3-D 培养物相比 VEGF-α 和 HIF1α 的表达差异。COL2A1(1.00 ± 0.02 对 1.86 ± 0.18 对 2.95 ± 0.56)和 COL10A1(1.00 ± 0.03 对 5.52 ± 0.66 对 3.79 ± 0.36)的表达在球体(p(COL2A1)= 0.003;p(COL10A1)<0.0001)和肿瘤(p(COL2A1)<0.001;p(COL10A1)<0.0001)中均更高。二硫化四乙基秋兰姆-氯化铜处理在 HT-1080 和 SW-1353 软骨肉瘤细胞的 2-D 单层培养中表现出高细胞毒性,但 3-D 球体对这种治疗具有高度耐药性。
我们提供了初步发现,有可能从软骨肉瘤细胞系和两个人类软骨肉瘤(一个去分化软骨肉瘤和一个中间级软骨肉瘤)中生成 3-D 球体。从人类肿瘤中衍生的软骨肉瘤球体表现出与原发性肿瘤更相似的形态,并且我们观察到球体中软骨标志物的表达与原发性肿瘤相似,与单层培养相比,我们观察到球体中胶原蛋白标志物的表达更高。球体也表现出比单层细胞更高的化疗耐药性,但需要更多的患者来源的软骨肉瘤球体来进一步得出结论,即 3-D 培养物可能模拟软骨肉瘤临床上表现出的化疗耐药性。需要进一步研究患者来源的软骨肉瘤球体。
软骨肉瘤对化疗和放疗具有耐药性,我们相信如果可以复制这些球体,那么 3-D 球体等模型可能为研究人类软骨肉瘤提供一种方法。需要进行更全面的基因组研究,以比较 2-D 和 3-D 模型与原发性肿瘤,以确定在体外研究这种疾病的最佳方法。