• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食物浪费倾向:对食物外观恶化的行为反应。

Food waste tendencies: Behavioral response to cosmetic deterioration of food.

机构信息

Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233287. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0233287
PMID:32469982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7259764/
Abstract

American households discard a significant amount of food that represent a sizable portion of their food expenditures. This study adds to our understanding of product attributes associated with food waste, with a focus on cosmetic deterioration during home storage. Specifically, we profile a sample of U.S. individuals by patterns of common food-related behaviors and determine the effects of product attributes on food waste tendencies at the point of consumption by distinct behavioral profiles. An interactive survey at the Minnesota State Fair (N = 333) was used to obtain measurements on food-related behavior and sociodemographic factors. The survey included a conjoint task to elicit food discard tendencies to construct the food waste proxy. The study considered cosmetic deterioration, date labels, implied shelf life, package size, and prices paid, in fresh, packaged spinach and ground beef products. Factor analysis and latent class modeling categorized the sample into two classes, revealing distinct food-related behavioral patterns. Planners, who constituted a slight majority in our sample, were likely to have established pre-shopping and in-store behavior and food management and cooking skills. Extemporaneous Consumers had inferior food handling routines and were less knowledgeable and skilled in the kitchen. Regression analysis using a random-effects tobit model showed Extemporaneous Consumers were prone to waste a greater portion of the spinach product than Planners. Otherwise, both classes showed similar increases in likelihood to discard the products, as their appearance deteriorated. Their tendency to waste increased with shorter remaining shelf life for spinach but not for ground beef, and was not affected by the date label type. Results suggest an intervention that targets a general audience designed to enhance people's skills to discern edibility of food in home storage by manipulating sensory expectations from cosmetic deterioration could be impactful in efforts to curtail food waste.

摘要

美国家庭扔掉了大量的食物,这些食物占他们食品支出的很大一部分。本研究通过关注家庭储存过程中的外观恶化,增加了我们对与食品浪费相关的产品属性的理解。具体来说,我们通过常见食品相关行为模式对美国个体进行了样本分析,并根据不同的行为模式确定了产品属性对消费点食品浪费倾向的影响。在明尼苏达州博览会上进行的一项互动调查(N=333)用于获取与食品相关的行为和社会人口因素的测量值。该调查包括一项联合任务,以了解食品丢弃倾向,从而构建食品浪费代理。研究考虑了外观恶化、日期标签、暗示保质期、包装尺寸和支付价格,以新鲜包装菠菜和碎牛肉产品为例。因子分析和潜在类别建模将样本分为两类,揭示了不同的食品相关行为模式。在我们的样本中,计划者略占多数,他们可能已经制定了购物前和店内行为以及食品管理和烹饪技能。临时消费者的食品处理程序较差,在厨房中知识和技能较差。使用随机效应 Tobit 模型的回归分析表明,临时消费者比计划者更容易浪费更多的菠菜产品。否则,随着产品外观恶化,两个类别都显示出丢弃产品的可能性相似增加。他们浪费的倾向随着菠菜剩余保质期的缩短而增加,但对于碎牛肉则没有增加,并且不受日期标签类型的影响。研究结果表明,针对普通受众的干预措施旨在通过操纵从外观恶化中产生的感官预期,增强人们在家中储存食物时辨别可食用性的技能,这可能对减少食物浪费的努力产生影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fef9/7259764/3f840690c271/pone.0233287.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fef9/7259764/3f840690c271/pone.0233287.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fef9/7259764/3f840690c271/pone.0233287.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Food waste tendencies: Behavioral response to cosmetic deterioration of food.食物浪费倾向:对食物外观恶化的行为反应。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233287. eCollection 2020.
2
Consumer behaviour towards price-reduced suboptimal foods in the supermarket and the relation to food waste in households.消费者在超市对降价次优食品的行为及其与家庭食物浪费的关系。
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:246-258. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 6.
3
Attitudes and behaviour towards convenience food and food waste in the United Kingdom.英国对方便食品和食物浪费的态度与行为。
Appetite. 2016 Aug 1;103:17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
Wasted Food: U.S. Consumers' Reported Awareness, Attitudes, and Behaviors.浪费的食物:美国消费者报告的认知、态度及行为
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127881. eCollection 2015.
5
Socio-Demographic Factors, Behaviors, Motivations, and Attitudes in Food Waste Management of Romanian Households.罗马尼亚家庭食物浪费管理中的社会人口因素、行为、动机和态度。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 16;16(16):2738. doi: 10.3390/nu16162738.
6
From the shopping basket to the landfill: Drivers of consumer food waste behaviour.从购物篮到垃圾填埋场:消费者食物浪费行为的驱动因素。
Waste Manag. 2023 Sep 1;169:157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
7
Domestic waste disposal practice and perceptions of private sector waste management in urban Accra.阿克拉市区家庭垃圾处理实践及对私营部门垃圾管理的看法
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 8;14:697. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-697.
8
Who Reads Food Labels? Selected Predictors of Consumer Interest in Front-of-Package and Back-of-Package Labels during and after the Purchase.谁会阅读食品标签?购买前后,消费者对食品标签中“营养成分表”和“配料表”关注的预测因素分析
Nutrients. 2020 Aug 27;12(9):2605. doi: 10.3390/nu12092605.
9
"Waste not and stay at home" evidence of decreased food waste during the COVID-19 pandemic from the U.S. and Italy.“不浪费,待在家”:美国和意大利的 COVID-19 大流行期间减少食物浪费的证据。
Appetite. 2021 May 1;160:105110. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105110. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
Use of intelligent applications to reduce household food waste.利用智能应用减少家庭食物浪费。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(6):1048-1061. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2018.1556580. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the nitrogen reservoir of biodegradable household garbage and its potential in replacing synthetic nitrogen fertilizers in China.探索中国可生物降解生活垃圾的氮素储存库及其替代合成氮肥的潜力。
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 18;10:e12621. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12621. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of date labels on willingness to consume dairy products: Implications for food waste reduction.日期标签对乳制品消费意愿的影响:对减少食物浪费的启示。
Waste Manag. 2018 Aug;78:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.021. Epub 2018 May 28.
2
Food for thought: Comparing self-reported versus curbside measurements of household food wasting behavior and the predictive capacity of behavioral determinants.值得思考的是:比较自我报告和路边测量家庭食物浪费行为的方法以及行为决定因素的预测能力。
Waste Manag. 2020 Jan 1;101:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.09.032. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
3
Model selection and averaging in the assessment of the drivers of household food waste to reduce the probability of false positives.
在评估家庭食物浪费驱动因素时进行模型选择和平均以降低误报概率。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0192075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192075. eCollection 2018.
4
Food wasters: Profiling consumers' attitude to waste food in Italy.食物浪费者:剖析意大利消费者对待食物浪费的态度。
Waste Manag. 2018 Feb;72:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
5
Domestic food practices: A study of food management behaviors and the role of food preparation planning in reducing waste.家庭食品实践:食品管理行为研究及食品准备规划在减少浪费中的作用。
Appetite. 2018 Feb 1;121:215-227. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.093. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
6
Visually suboptimal bananas: How ripeness affects consumer expectation and perception.外观不佳的香蕉:成熟度如何影响消费者的期望和感知。
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:472-481. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
7
Processing- and product-related causes for food waste and implications for the food supply chain.与加工和产品相关的食物浪费原因及其对食品供应链的影响。
Waste Manag. 2017 Mar;61:461-472. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.027. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
8
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
9
Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste.消费者食物浪费行为的决定因素:通往食物浪费的两条路径。
Appetite. 2016 Jan 1;96:7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
10
Wasted Food: U.S. Consumers' Reported Awareness, Attitudes, and Behaviors.浪费的食物:美国消费者报告的认知、态度及行为
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127881. eCollection 2015.