• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗马尼亚家庭食物浪费管理中的社会人口因素、行为、动机和态度。

Socio-Demographic Factors, Behaviors, Motivations, and Attitudes in Food Waste Management of Romanian Households.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory and Food Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020956 Bucharest, Romania.

Faculty of Pharmacy, "Vasile Goldiș" Western University of Arad, 310045 Arad, Romania.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2024 Aug 16;16(16):2738. doi: 10.3390/nu16162738.

DOI:10.3390/nu16162738
PMID:39203874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11356938/
Abstract

(1) Background: Food waste (FW) in Romania is 70 Kg/capita/year, while 70% of food waste comes from public catering, retail services, and households (over 50%-47 million tons). The present study investigates the socio-demographic factors, behaviors, motivations, and attitudes related to food waste management in Romanian households. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using an online questionnaire via the Google Forms platform from 15 April 2023 to 15 May 2023. The questionnaire was designed to assess various aspects, such as some socio-demographic information (age, sex, occupation, area of residence, study level, household members number, children <18 years of age); the personal involvement and frequency of food purchases and homemade food cooking; the main sources that generate food waste; the motivation and frequency with which food waste occurs; the level of awareness regarding the impact of food waste; the respondents' intentions regarding sustainable behaviors and practices for food management; the level of information and familiarity of the respondents with the notions of validity and how these may influence their food consumption decisions. (3) Results: The results show that FW incidence is occasionally (42%), very rarely (43.33%), frequently (15%), and no food waste was reported by 2.66% of respondents. The 35-44 age category records the highest FW frequency, followed by 18-24. The most wasted are homemade food (29.67%), bread and bakery products (27.00%), and fruits and vegetables (14.33%). High involvement in purchasing and buying food following a previously established list reduces FW frequency. The same is valid for high daily involvement in food and homemade cooking. High interest in the FW problem and its perception as a waste of money leads to diminishing it, while guilty feelings increase the FW level (37.50% to 73.33%). (4) Conclusions: The present study shows that household food waste management is a multifactorial process that involves numerous socio-demographic, behavioral, and emotional aspects. Extensive data analysis supports our results, revealing deep self-reported information details and confirming its complex approach.

摘要

(1) 背景:罗马尼亚的食物浪费量为每人每年 70 公斤,而 70%的食物浪费来自公共餐饮、零售服务和家庭(超过 50%-47 百万吨)。本研究调查了罗马尼亚家庭中与食物浪费管理相关的社会人口因素、行为、动机和态度。

(2) 方法:这是一项横断面观察性研究,使用在线问卷通过 Google Forms 平台于 2023 年 4 月 15 日至 2023 年 5 月 15 日进行。问卷旨在评估各种方面,例如一些社会人口信息(年龄、性别、职业、居住地区、学历、家庭成员数量、18 岁以下的儿童);个人参与和购买食物以及自制食物烹饪的频率;产生食物浪费的主要来源;发生食物浪费的动机和频率;对食物浪费影响的认识程度;受访者关于可持续行为和食物管理实践的意图;受访者对有效性概念的信息和熟悉程度,以及这些概念如何影响他们的食物消费决策。

(3) 结果:结果表明,食物浪费的发生率偶尔发生(42%)、很少发生(43.33%)、经常发生(15%),2.66%的受访者没有食物浪费。35-44 岁年龄段记录的食物浪费频率最高,其次是 18-24 岁年龄段。浪费最多的是自制食物(29.67%)、面包和烘焙产品(27.00%)和水果和蔬菜(14.33%)。高参与购买和购买按预先确定的清单购买食物会降低食物浪费的频率。同样适用于高日常参与食物和自制烹饪。对食物浪费问题的高度关注及其作为金钱浪费的认知会减少浪费,而内疚感会增加食物浪费水平(37.50%至 73.33%)。

(4) 结论:本研究表明,家庭食物浪费管理是一个多因素过程,涉及众多社会人口、行为和情感方面。广泛的数据分析支持我们的结果,揭示了深入的自我报告信息细节,并证实了其复杂的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/037d49bf192c/nutrients-16-02738-g011a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/5d3374f349d6/nutrients-16-02738-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/2a1ebaf3a2c7/nutrients-16-02738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/c6944300fb0b/nutrients-16-02738-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/d33922d9f4b4/nutrients-16-02738-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/9365bccd04bf/nutrients-16-02738-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/a3dd518c4827/nutrients-16-02738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/ae5f1d42aa74/nutrients-16-02738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/7d4785626567/nutrients-16-02738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/2b3f745b27d2/nutrients-16-02738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/927a81914e4b/nutrients-16-02738-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/037d49bf192c/nutrients-16-02738-g011a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/5d3374f349d6/nutrients-16-02738-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/2a1ebaf3a2c7/nutrients-16-02738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/c6944300fb0b/nutrients-16-02738-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/d33922d9f4b4/nutrients-16-02738-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/9365bccd04bf/nutrients-16-02738-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/a3dd518c4827/nutrients-16-02738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/ae5f1d42aa74/nutrients-16-02738-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/7d4785626567/nutrients-16-02738-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/2b3f745b27d2/nutrients-16-02738-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/927a81914e4b/nutrients-16-02738-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b254/11356938/037d49bf192c/nutrients-16-02738-g011a.jpg

相似文献

1
Socio-Demographic Factors, Behaviors, Motivations, and Attitudes in Food Waste Management of Romanian Households.罗马尼亚家庭食物浪费管理中的社会人口因素、行为、动机和态度。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 16;16(16):2738. doi: 10.3390/nu16162738.
2
Food waste prevention in Athens, Greece: The effect of family characteristics.希腊雅典的食物浪费预防:家庭特征的影响
Waste Manag Res. 2016 Dec;34(12):1210-1216. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16672318. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
3
The attitudes and practices of United Arab Emirates consumers towards food waste: A nationwide cross-sectional study.阿拉伯联合酋长国消费者对食物浪费的态度与行为:一项全国性横断面研究。
F1000Res. 2024 Feb 13;12:911. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.135678.2. eCollection 2023.
4
Predicting food waste in households with children: socio-economic and food-related behavior factors.预测有孩子家庭中的食物浪费:社会经济和与食物相关的行为因素。
Front Nutr. 2023 Oct 9;10:1249310. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1249310. eCollection 2023.
5
Domestic waste disposal practice and perceptions of private sector waste management in urban Accra.阿克拉市区家庭垃圾处理实践及对私营部门垃圾管理的看法
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 8;14:697. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-697.
6
The influence of socio-demographic, psychological and knowledge-related variables alongside perceived cooking and food skills abilities in the prediction of diet quality in adults: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.社会人口统计学、心理和知识相关变量以及感知烹饪和食物技能能力对成年人饮食质量预测的影响:一项全国代表性横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 26;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0440-4.
7
The contribution of three components of nutrition knowledge to socio-economic differences in food purchasing choices.营养知识的三个组成部分对食品购买选择方面社会经济差异的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Aug;17(8):1814-24. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002036. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
8
Daily cost of consumer food wasted, inedible, and consumed in the United States, 2001-2016.2001-2016 年美国消费者浪费、不可食用和食用的食物的日平均成本。
Nutr J. 2020 Apr 20;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00552-w.
9
Comprehensive evaluation of demographic, socio-economic and other associated risk factors affecting the occurrence of dengue incidence among Colombo and Kandy Districts of Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study.斯里兰卡科伦坡和康堤地区影响登革热发病率的人口统计学、社会经济和其他相关危险因素的综合评估:一项横断面研究。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Aug 24;11(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3060-9.
10
Sociodemographic Differences in the Dietary Quality of Food-at-Home Acquisitions and Purchases among Participants in the U.S. Nationally Representative Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS).《美国全国代表性食物获取和购买调查(FoodAPS)中参与者家庭获取和购买食物的饮食质量在社会人口学方面的差异》。
Nutrients. 2020 Aug 7;12(8):2354. doi: 10.3390/nu12082354.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Pediatric Pertussis Cases: A Retrospective Study from Southeast Romania.罗马尼亚东南部小儿百日咳病例的临床和流行病学特征:一项回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;14(5):428. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14050428.
2
A Comprehensive Analysis of Infections in Children and Adolescents: Results of a 7-Year Retrospective Study and Literature Review.儿童和青少年感染情况的综合分析:一项7年回顾性研究及文献综述的结果
Pathogens. 2025 Jan 10;14(1):53. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14010053.
3
Perception, Trust, and Motivation in Consumer Behavior for Organic Food Acquisition: An Exploratory Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrative Approach to Risk Factors in Simple Chronic Obstructive Airway Diseases of the Lung or Associated with Metabolic Syndrome-Analysis and Prediction.综合分析肺单纯性慢性气道疾病或与代谢综合征相关的危险因素:分析与预测。
Nutrients. 2024 Jun 13;16(12):1851. doi: 10.3390/nu16121851.
2
Phytochemical Screening and Antibacterial Activity of Commercially Available Essential Oils Combinations with Conventional Antibiotics against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria.市售精油组合与传统抗生素对革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的植物化学筛选及抗菌活性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 23;13(6):478. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060478.
3
有机食品购买中消费者行为的感知、信任与动机:一项探索性研究。
Foods. 2025 Jan 17;14(2):293. doi: 10.3390/foods14020293.
Assessment of Dietary and Lifestyle Quality among the Romanian Population in the Post-Pandemic Period.
疫情后时期罗马尼亚人群饮食与生活方式质量评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 14;12(10):1006. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101006.
4
The relationship between retail price promotions and household-level food waste: Busting the myth with behavioural data?**零售价格促销与家庭层面食物浪费之间的关系:行为数据能否打破这一神话?**
Waste Manag. 2024 Jan 1;173:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.10.032. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
5
Research on Consumer Perception Regarding Traditional Food Products of Romania.罗马尼亚传统食品的消费者认知研究。
Foods. 2023 Jul 17;12(14):2723. doi: 10.3390/foods12142723.
6
Platelets Rich Plasma (PRP) Procedure in the Healing of Atonic Wounds.富血小板血浆(PRP)疗法促进无张力伤口愈合
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 7;12(12):3890. doi: 10.3390/jcm12123890.
7
The Impact of Medical Nutrition Intervention on the Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Hemodialysis Patients with Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease: A Case Series.医学营养干预对 5 期慢性肾脏病血液透析患者高磷血症管理的影响:病例系列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;20(6):5049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065049.
8
Functional foods and their impact on health.功能性食品及其对健康的影响。
J Food Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;60(3):820-834. doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05193-3. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
9
The role of nutrition in wound healing: an overview.营养在伤口愈合中的作用:概述。
Br J Nurs. 2021 Mar 11;30(5):S38-S42. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.5.S38.
10
Protection Before Impact: the Potential Neuroprotective Role of Nutritional Supplementation in Sports-Related Head Trauma.撞击前的保护:营养补充在运动相关性颅脑损伤中的潜在神经保护作用。
Sports Med. 2018 Mar;48(Suppl 1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0847-3.