EPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Taipas, 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Jul;146:105056. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105056. Epub 2020 May 7.
The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (Movement ABC-2) is widely used to assess children's motor function, yet there is a lack of normative data for many countries.
To assess the extent to which the application of different population reference norms for the Movement ABC-2 affects the classification and prevalence of motor impairment.
Data were obtained from two Portuguese regions participating in the Screening to Improve Health in Very Preterm Infants in Europe (SHIPS) Study, which was a five year follow-up of a cohort of children born at <32 weeks' gestation in 2011-2012 in 19 regions in 11 European countries. Perinatal data were extracted from medical records and the Movement ABC-2 was administered at five years of age.
Of 542 Portuguese children eligible for the five-year follow-up, 413 (76.2%) were evaluated.
Movement ABC-2 raw scores were converted to standardized scores using norms from four countries with national standardisations (UK, Netherlands/Belgium, France and Italy).
The prevalence of significant movement difficulties (total score ≤ 5th percentile) was 28.5% using Dutch/Flemish norms, 23.3% using French norms, 16.5% using UK norms and 11.4% using Italian norms; 10.8% and 68.3% of the children were consistently classified as having significant movement difficulties and as not having significant movement difficulties, respectively, according to any norms. However, for 20.9% of children there was a disagreement in motor function status using different norms.
The use of different test norms has a large impact on the proportion of children classified with significant movement difficulties, with implications for clinical referrals, healthcare costs and research. Our results underscore the importance of using appropriately validated tests with sound psychometric properties, and raise questions about the large differences in norms for the Movement ABC-2 in European countries.
儿童运动评估量表第二版(Movement ABC-2)被广泛用于评估儿童的运动功能,但许多国家缺乏其规范数据。
评估应用 Movement ABC-2 的不同人群参考规范对运动障碍的分类和患病率的影响程度。
数据来自参加欧洲改善非常早产儿健康筛查(SHIPS)研究的两个葡萄牙地区,该研究是对 2011-2012 年在 11 个欧洲国家的 19 个地区出生的妊娠 32 周以下的队列进行的为期五年的随访。围产期数据从病历中提取,在 5 岁时进行 Movement ABC-2 测试。
542 名符合 5 年随访条件的葡萄牙儿童中,有 413 名(76.2%)接受了评估。
使用来自四个国家(英国、荷兰/比利时、法国和意大利)的标准化规范将 Movement ABC-2 的原始分数转换为标准分数。
使用荷兰/佛兰芒规范,有 28.5%的儿童存在明显的运动困难(总得分≤第 5 百分位数),使用法国规范,有 23.3%的儿童存在明显的运动困难,使用英国规范,有 16.5%的儿童存在明显的运动困难,使用意大利规范,有 11.4%的儿童存在明显的运动困难;根据任何规范,有 10.8%和 68.3%的儿童分别被一致归类为存在明显运动困难和不存在明显运动困难。然而,对于 20.9%的儿童,使用不同的规范时,其运动功能状态存在不一致。
使用不同的测试规范对被归类为存在明显运动困难的儿童比例有很大的影响,这对临床转诊、医疗保健成本和研究都有影响。我们的结果强调了使用具有适当验证的具有良好心理测量特性的测试的重要性,并对欧洲国家 Movement ABC-2 规范的巨大差异提出了质疑。