Suppr超能文献

跨越三百万年旧石器技术变迁的肌肉募集和石器工具使用人体工程学。

Muscle recruitment and stone tool use ergonomics across three million years of Palaeolithic technological transitions.

机构信息

School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, UK.

School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent, Medway, Kent, ME4 4AG, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2020 Jul;144:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102796. Epub 2020 May 26.

Abstract

Ergonomic relationships that minimize muscle activity relative to the creation of cutting stress underpin the design of modern knives, saws, and axes. The Palaeolithic archaeological record, and the > 3 million years of technological behavior that it represents, is predominantly characterized by sharp stone implements used for cutting. To date, we do not know whether Palaeolithic hominins adhered to ergonomic principles when designing stone tools, if lithic technological transitions were linked to ease-of-use advances, or even how muscularly demanding different Palaeolithic tools are on an empirically defined relative basis. Here, we report the results of an experimental program that examines how four key stone tool types, produced between ∼ 3.3 million and ∼ 40 thousand years ago, influence muscle activation in the hominin upper limb. Using standardized laboratory-based tests designed to imitate Pleistocene cutting behaviors, surface electromyography recorded electrical activity (amplitude) in nine muscles across the hand, forearm and shoulder of modern humans during the use of replica Lomekwian, Oldowan, Acheulean and Mousterian stone tools. Results confirm digit flexors and abductors, particularly the first dorsal interosseous and flexor pollicis longus, to be the most heavily recruited muscles during the use of all tool types. Significant differences in muscle activation are, however, identified dependent on the type of stone tool used. Notably, the abductor digiti minimi, flexor pollicis longus, and biceps brachii were highly activated during handaxe use, particularly when compared to the use of Oldowan and Levallois flakes. Results are discussed in light of current understanding on the origin of Lower and Middle Palaeolithic technologies, why specific tool types were produced over others during these periods, and the extent to which early hominins produced ergonomically designed tools.

摘要

人体工程学关系可使切割应力下的肌肉活动最小化,这是现代刀具、锯和斧设计的基础。旧石器时代的考古记录,以及它所代表的超过 300 万年的技术行为,主要以用于切割的锋利石器为特征。迄今为止,我们尚不清楚旧石器时代人类在设计石器工具时是否遵循人体工程学原则,如果石器技术的转变与易用性的提高有关,甚至不知道不同的旧石器工具在经验定义的相对基础上对肌肉的要求有多高。在这里,我们报告了一个实验计划的结果,该计划研究了四种关键石器工具类型(在大约 330 万至 4 万年前生产)如何影响人类上肢的肌肉激活。使用标准化的实验室测试,旨在模仿更新世的切割行为,表面肌电图记录了现代人类在使用复制品洛美奎安、奥杜威、阿舍利和莫斯特石器时手、前臂和肩部的 9 块肌肉的电活动(幅度)。结果证实,在使用所有工具类型时,手指屈肌和外展肌,特别是第一背侧骨间肌和拇指长屈肌,是募集最多的肌肉。然而,根据所使用的石器类型,肌肉激活存在显著差异。值得注意的是,在使用手斧时,小指外展肌、拇指长屈肌和肱二头肌高度激活,尤其是与使用奥杜威和勒瓦卢瓦石片相比。结果结合当前对下旧石器时代和中旧石器时代技术起源的理解、在这些时期为何特定工具类型比其他类型更受欢迎以及早期人类生产符合人体工程学设计的工具的程度进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验