• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旧石器时代技术行为的人工限制

Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behaviours.

作者信息

Key Alastair J M, Dunmore Christopher J

机构信息

School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2018 Aug 16;6:e5399. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5399. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.5399
PMID:30128191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6098946/
Abstract

The causes of technological innovation in the Palaeolithic archaeological record are central to understanding Plio-Pleistocene hominin behaviour and temporal trends in artefact variation. Palaeolithic archaeologists frequently investigate the Oldowan-Acheulean transition and technological developments during the subsequent million years of the Acheulean technocomplex. Here, we approach the question of why innovative stone tool production techniques occur in the Lower Palaeolithic archaeological record from an experimental biomechanical and evolutionary perspective. Nine experienced flintknappers reproduced Oldowan flake tools, 'early Acheulean' handaxes, and 'late Acheulean' handaxes while pressure data were collected from their non-dominant (core-holding) hands. For each flake removal or platform preparation event performed, the percussor used, the stage of reduction, the core securing technique utilised, and the relative success of flake removals were recorded. Results indicate that more heavily reduced, intensively shaped handaxes with greater volumetric controls do not necessarily require significantly greater manual pressure than Oldowan flake tools or earlier 'rougher' handaxe forms. Platform preparation events do, however, require significantly greater pressure relative to either soft or hard hammer flake detachments. No significant relationships were identified between flaking success and pressure variation. Our results suggest that the preparation of flake platforms, a technological behaviour associated with the production of late Acheulean handaxes, could plausibly have been restricted prior to the emergence of more forceful precision-manipulative capabilities than those required for earlier lithic technologies.

摘要

旧石器时代考古记录中的技术创新原因对于理解上新世-更新世古人类行为和人工制品变化的时间趋势至关重要。旧石器时代考古学家经常研究奥杜威文化-阿舍利文化的转变以及阿舍利技术复合体随后一百万年中的技术发展。在此,我们从实验生物力学和进化的角度探讨旧石器时代考古记录中创新石器制作技术出现的原因。九位经验丰富的燧石打制者复制了奥杜威文化的片状工具、“早期阿舍利文化”手斧和“晚期阿舍利文化”手斧,同时从他们的非优势手(持核手)收集压力数据。对于每次进行的片状石器去除或台面准备操作,记录所使用的敲击工具、石器制作阶段、所采用的核心固定技术以及片状石器去除的相对成功率。结果表明,相比奥杜威文化的片状工具或早期“更粗糙”的手斧形式,体积控制更好、制作更精细且经过更多加工的手斧并不一定需要显著更大的手部压力。然而,相对于软锤或硬锤片状石器剥离,台面准备操作确实需要显著更大的压力。在石器剥落成功率与压力变化之间未发现显著关系。我们的结果表明,片状石器台面的准备工作,这一与晚期阿舍利文化手斧制作相关的技术行为,在比早期石器技术所需更强大的精确操作能力出现之前,可能确实受到了限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/c40f13901dc9/peerj-06-5399-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/2da460186079/peerj-06-5399-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/f83d00710148/peerj-06-5399-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/cc87f3aa16ff/peerj-06-5399-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/3a8d744f3b8e/peerj-06-5399-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/0d95f614fccc/peerj-06-5399-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/011a4d80cb4e/peerj-06-5399-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/b0d3bea8995d/peerj-06-5399-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/c40f13901dc9/peerj-06-5399-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/2da460186079/peerj-06-5399-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/f83d00710148/peerj-06-5399-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/cc87f3aa16ff/peerj-06-5399-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/3a8d744f3b8e/peerj-06-5399-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/0d95f614fccc/peerj-06-5399-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/011a4d80cb4e/peerj-06-5399-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/b0d3bea8995d/peerj-06-5399-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01b4/6098946/c40f13901dc9/peerj-06-5399-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Manual restrictions on Palaeolithic technological behaviours.旧石器时代技术行为的人工限制
PeerJ. 2018 Aug 16;6:e5399. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5399. eCollection 2018.
2
Dedicated core-on-anvil production of bladelet-like flakes in the Acheulean at Thomas Quarry I - L1 (Casablanca, Morocco).在摩洛哥卡萨布兰卡的托马斯采石场 I-L1 的阿舍利石器工业中,专门制作叶片状石片。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 8;10(1):9225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65903-3.
3
Muscle recruitment and stone tool use ergonomics across three million years of Palaeolithic technological transitions.跨越三百万年旧石器技术变迁的肌肉募集和石器工具使用人体工程学。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jul;144:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102796. Epub 2020 May 26.
4
Technological behaviour in the early Acheulean of EF-HR (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania).早期阿舍利石器技术在 EF-HR(坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷)的行为。
J Hum Evol. 2018 Jul;120:329-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
5
Did Early Pleistocene hominins control hammer strike angles when making stone tools?早更新世古人类在制造石器时是否能控制锤击角度?
J Hum Evol. 2023 Oct;183:103427. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103427. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
6
Hand grip diversity and frequency during the use of Lower Palaeolithic stone cutting-tools.使用旧石器时代晚期石器时的手握多样性和频率。
J Hum Evol. 2018 Dec;125:137-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
7
Oldowan technological behaviour at HWK EE (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania).奥杜威工业技术在 HWK EE(坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷)的表现。
J Hum Evol. 2018 Jul;120:236-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.04.001.
8
Comparison of handaxes from Bose Basin (China) and the western Acheulean indicates convergence of form, not cognitive differences.中国博斯盆地手斧与西方阿舍利手斧的比较表明,两者形式趋同,而非认知差异。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035804. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
9
Stone toolmaking difficulty and the evolution of hominin technological skills.石器工具制作难度与人类技术技能的演化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 7;12(1):5883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09914-2.
10
The oldest Homo erectus buried lithic horizon from the Eastern Saharan Africa. EDAR 7 - an Acheulean assemblage with Kombewa method from the Eastern Desert, Sudan.最古老的直立人埋葬石器层来自撒哈拉沙漠东部非洲。EDAR 7-来自苏丹东部沙漠的科姆贝瓦方法的阿舍利组合。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 23;16(3):e0248279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248279. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconstructing hammerstone size flake by flake: an experimental approach.逐片重建石锤大小的石片:一种实验方法。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 May;22(226):20240879. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0879. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Design and development of a sensorized hammerstone for accurate force measurement in stone knapping experiments.设计和开发一种带传感器的石锤,用于在石器加工实验中精确测量力。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 17;19(9):e0310520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310520. eCollection 2024.
3
3.3 million years of stone tool complexity suggests that cumulative culture began during the Middle Pleistocene.

本文引用的文献

1
Is there a Developed Oldowan A at Olduvai Gorge? A diachronic analysis of the Oldowan in Bed I and Lower-Middle Bed II at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.奥杜威峡谷是否存在发展完善的旧石器时代早期阿舍利技术?坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷 I 层和下中层 II 层的旧石器时代研究。
J Hum Evol. 2018 Jul;120:92-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 May 8.
2
The manual pressures of stone tool behaviors and their implications for the evolution of the human hand.石器行为的手动压力及其对人类手部进化的影响。
J Hum Evol. 2018 Jun;119:14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
The handaxe reconsidered.
330 万年的石器工具复杂性表明,累积文化始于中更新世。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 25;121(26):e2319175121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319175121. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
4
The unexpected importance of the fifth digit during stone tool production.在石器制作过程中,第五个手指意外地变得非常重要。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 13;9(1):16724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53332-w.
重新审视手斧。
Evol Anthropol. 2018 Jan;27(1):21-29. doi: 10.1002/evan.21552.
4
Form and function in the Lower Palaeolithic: history, progress, and continued relevance.旧石器时代早期的形式与功能:历史、进展及持续的相关性
J Anthropol Sci. 2017 Dec 30;95:67-108. doi: 10.4436/JASS.95017. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
High handaxe symmetry at the beginning of the European Acheulian: The data from la Noira (France) in context.欧洲阿舍利文化初期手斧的高度对称性:法国拉努瓦遗址的数据背景分析
PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177063. eCollection 2017.
6
Biomechanics of microliths manufacture: a preliminary approach to Neanderthal's motor constrains in the frame of embodied cognition.微石器制造的生物力学:在具身认知框架下对尼安德特人运动限制的初步探讨。
J Anthropol Sci. 2017 Dec 30;95:203-217. doi: 10.4436/JASS.95005. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
Two Acheuleans, two humankinds: From 1.5 to 0.85 Ma at Melka Kunture (Upper Awash, Ethiopian highlands).两种阿舍利文化,两个人类群体:在梅尔卡昆图雷(埃塞俄比亚高地阿瓦什上游)从150万年前到85万年前。
J Anthropol Sci. 2017 Dec 30;95:137-181. doi: 10.4436/JASS.95001. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
8
An earlier origin for stone tool making: implications for cognitive evolution and the transition to Homo.石器制造的更早起源:对认知进化及向人属过渡的启示
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 5;371(1698). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0233.
9
Quantifying Oldowan Stone Tool Production at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania.量化坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷奥杜威石器的制作情况。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147352. eCollection 2016.
10
The Origin of The Acheulean: The 1.7 Million-Year-Old Site of FLK West, Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania).阿舍利文化的起源:坦桑尼亚奥杜威峡谷FLK西区的170万年前遗址。
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 7;5:17839. doi: 10.1038/srep17839.