New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research; Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Nutr. 2020 Aug 1;150(8):2009-2015. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa150.
Longer-term feeding studies suggest that a low-carbohydrate diet increases energy expenditure, consistent with the carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity. However, the validity of methodology utilized in these studies, involving doubly labeled water (DLW), has been questioned.
The aim of this study was to determine whether dietary energy requirement for weight-loss maintenance is higher on a low- compared with high-carbohydrate diet.
The study reports secondary outcomes from a feeding study in which the primary outcome was total energy expenditure (TEE). After attaining a mean Run-in weight loss of 10.5%, 164 adults (BMI ≥25 kg/m2; 70.1% women) were randomly assigned to Low-Carbohydrate (percentage of total energy from carbohydrate, fat, protein: 20/60/20), Moderate-Carbohydrate (40/40/20), or High-Carbohydrate (60/20/20) Test diets for 20 wk. Calorie content was adjusted to maintain individual body weight within ± 2 kg of the postweight-loss value. In analyses by intention-to-treat (ITT, completers, n = 148) and per protocol (PP, completers also achieving weight-loss maintenance, n = 110), we compared the estimated energy requirement (EER) from 10 to 20 wk of the Test diets using ANCOVA.
Mean EER was higher in the Low- versus High-Carbohydrate group in models of varying covariate structure involving ITT [ranging from 181 (95% CI: 8-353) to 246 (64-427) kcal/d; P ≤0.04] and PP [ranging from 245 (43-446) to 323 (122-525) kcal/d; P ≤0.02]. This difference remained significant in sensitivity analyses accounting for change in adiposity and possible nonadherence.
Energy requirement was higher on a low- versus high-carbohydrate diet during weight-loss maintenance in adults, commensurate with TEE. These data are consistent with the carbohydrate-insulin model and lend qualified support for the validity of the DLW method with diets varying in macronutrient composition. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02068885.
长期喂养研究表明,低碳水化合物饮食会增加能量消耗,这与肥胖的碳水化合物-胰岛素模型一致。然而,这些研究中使用的双标水(DLW)方法的有效性一直存在争议。
本研究旨在确定在减肥维持期,低碳水化合物饮食相比高碳水化合物饮食是否需要更高的能量摄入。
本研究报告了一项喂养研究的次要结果,该研究的主要结果是总能量消耗(TEE)。在达到平均 10.5%的初始减肥体重后,164 名成年人(BMI≥25 kg/m2;70.1%为女性)被随机分配到低碳水化合物(总能量的 20%来自碳水化合物、脂肪和蛋白质)、中碳水化合物(40%来自碳水化合物、40%来自脂肪和 20%来自蛋白质)或高碳水化合物(60%来自碳水化合物、20%来自脂肪和 20%来自蛋白质)试验饮食组,持续 20 周。卡路里摄入量进行了调整,以保持个体体重在减肥后体重的±2kg 范围内。在按意向治疗(ITT,完成者,n=148)和按方案(PP,也完成减肥维持的完成者,n=110)进行的分析中,我们使用 ANCOVA 比较了试验饮食 10 至 20 周的估计能量需求(EER)。
在涉及 ITT 的不同协变量结构模型中,低碳水化合物组的平均 EER 高于高碳水化合物组[范围从 181(95%CI:8-353)到 246(64-427)千卡/天;P≤0.04]和 PP[范围从 245(43-446)到 323(122-525)千卡/天;P≤0.02]。在考虑肥胖变化和可能的不依从性的敏感性分析中,这种差异仍然显著。
在成年人减肥维持期间,低碳水化合物饮食的能量需求高于高碳水化合物饮食,与 TEE 一致。这些数据与碳水化合物-胰岛素模型一致,并为使用不同宏量营养素组成的饮食的 DLW 方法提供了有条件的支持。该试验在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 NCT02068885。