Neder J Alberto, Berton Danilo C, Nery Luiz E, Tan Wan C, Bourbeau Jean, O'Donnell Denis E
Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology and Respiratory Investigation Unit, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada
Division of Respirology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eur Respir J. 2020 Oct 1;56(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00191-2020. Print 2020 Oct.
Assessment of dyspnoea severity during incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has long been hampered by the lack of reference ranges as a function of work rate (WR) and ventilation ( ). This is particularly relevant to cycling, a testing modality which overtaxes the leg muscles leading to a heightened sensation of leg discomfort.Reference ranges based on dyspnoea percentiles (0-10 Borg scale) at standardised work rates and were established in 275 apparently healthy subjects aged 20-85 years (131 men). They were compared with values recorded in a randomly selected "validation" sample (n=451; 224 men). Their usefulness in properly uncovering the severity of exertional dyspnoea were tested in 167 subjects under investigation for chronic dyspnoea ("testing sample") who terminated CPET due to leg discomfort (86 men).Iso-work rate and, to a lesser extent, iso- reference ranges (5th-25th, 25th-50th, 50-75th and 75th-95th percentiles) increased as a function of age, being systematically higher in women (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in percentiles distribution between "reference" and "validation" samples (p>0.05). Submaximal dyspnoea-work rate scores fell within the 75th-95th or >95th percentiles in 108 out of 118 (91.5%) subjects of the "testing" sample who showed physiological abnormalities known to elicit exertional dyspnoea, ventilatory inefficiency and/or critical inspiratory constraints. In contrast, dyspnoea scores typically fell in the 5th-50th range in subjects without those abnormalities (p<0.001).This frame of reference might prove useful to uncover the severity of exertional dyspnoea in subjects who otherwise would be labelled as "non-dyspnoeic" while providing mechanistic insights into the genesis of this distressing symptom.
在递增式心肺运动试验(CPET)期间,由于缺乏作为工作率(WR)和通气量( )函数的参考范围,呼吸困难严重程度的评估长期以来受到阻碍。这对于骑行这种测试方式尤为重要,因为骑行会使腿部肌肉负担过重,导致腿部不适感增强。
在275名年龄在20 - 85岁的明显健康受试者(131名男性)中,建立了基于标准化工作率和通气量时呼吸困难百分位数(0 - 10 Borg量表)的参考范围。将这些范围与在随机选择的“验证”样本(n = 451;224名男性)中记录的值进行比较。在167名因腿部不适而终止CPET的慢性呼吸困难受调查受试者(“测试”样本,86名男性)中,测试了这些参考范围在正确揭示运动性呼吸困难严重程度方面的有用性。
等工作率以及在较小程度上等通气量参考范围(第5 - 25百分位数、第25 - 50百分位数、第50 - 75百分位数和第75 - 95百分位数)随年龄增加,女性的这些范围系统性地更高(p < 0.01)。“参考”样本和“验证”样本之间的百分位数分布没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。在“测试”样本中,118名出现已知会引发运动性呼吸困难、通气效率低下和/或临界吸气受限的生理异常的受试者中,有108名(91.5%)的次极量呼吸困难 - 工作率得分落在第75 - 95百分位数或>95百分位数范围内。相比之下,没有这些异常的受试者的呼吸困难得分通常落在第5 - 50百分位数范围内(p < 0.001)。
这个参考框架可能有助于揭示那些否则会被标记为“无呼吸困难”的受试者运动性呼吸困难的严重程度,同时为这种令人痛苦的症状的发生机制提供见解。