Griffith University, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Gold Coast, Australia
Central Queensland University, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bundaberg, Australia.
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Aug 9;32(169). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0016-2023. Print 2023 Sep 30.
Exertional dyspnoea is the primary diagnostic symptom for chronic cardiopulmonary disease populations. Whilst a number of exercise tests are used, there remains no gold standard clinical measure of exertional dyspnoea. The aim of this review was to comprehensively describe and evaluate all types of fixed-intensity exercise tests used to assess exertional dyspnoea in chronic cardiopulmonary populations and, where possible, report the reliability and responsiveness of the tests.
A systematic search of five electronic databases identified papers that examined 1) fixed-intensity exercise tests and measured exertional dyspnoea, 2) chronic cardiopulmonary populations, 3) exertional dyspnoea reported at isotime or upon completion of fixed-duration exercise tests, and 4) published in English.
Searches identified 8785 papers. 123 papers were included, covering exercise tests using a variety of fixed-intensity protocols. Three modes were identified, as follows: 1) cycling (n=87), 2) walking (n=31) and 3) other (step test (n=8) and arm exercise (n=2)). Most studies (98%) were performed on chronic respiratory disease patients. Nearly all studies (88%) used an incremental exercise test. 34% of studies used a fixed duration for the exercise test, with the remaining 66% using an exhaustion protocol recording exertional dyspnoea at isotime. Exertional dyspnoea was measured using the Borg scale (89%). 7% of studies reported reliability. Most studies (72%) examined the change in exertional dyspnoea in response to different interventions.
Considerable methodological variety of fixed-intensity exercise tests exists to assess exertional dyspnoea and most test protocols require incremental exercise tests. There does not appear to be a simple, universal test for measuring exertional dyspnoea in the clinical setting.
运动性呼吸困难是慢性心肺疾病患者的主要诊断症状。虽然有许多运动测试可供使用,但仍没有用于评估运动性呼吸困难的金标准临床测量方法。本综述的目的是全面描述和评估用于评估慢性心肺疾病人群运动性呼吸困难的所有类型的固定强度运动测试,并在可能的情况下报告测试的可靠性和反应性。
系统检索五个电子数据库,确定了检查以下内容的论文:1)固定强度运动测试和测量运动性呼吸困难,2)慢性心肺疾病人群,3)在等时或完成固定持续时间运动测试时报告的运动性呼吸困难,4)以英文发表。
搜索共确定了 8785 篇论文。共纳入 123 篇论文,涵盖了使用各种固定强度方案的运动测试。确定了三种模式,如下所示:1)自行车(n=87),2)步行(n=31)和 3)其他(台阶测试(n=8)和手臂运动(n=2))。大多数研究(98%)是在慢性呼吸系统疾病患者中进行的。几乎所有研究(88%)都使用递增运动测试。34%的研究使用固定的运动测试持续时间,其余 66%的研究使用疲劳协议,在等时记录运动性呼吸困难。运动性呼吸困难使用 Borg 量表(89%)进行测量。7%的研究报告了可靠性。大多数研究(72%)检查了不同干预措施对运动性呼吸困难变化的影响。
评估运动性呼吸困难的固定强度运动测试存在相当大的方法学差异,大多数测试方案需要递增运动测试。在临床环境中,似乎没有一种简单、通用的测试方法来测量运动性呼吸困难。