Romanzini Eliéder Prates, Barbero Rondineli Pavezzi, Reis Ricardo Andrade, Hadley David, Malheiros Euclides Braga
São Paulo State University, "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - Unesp, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane s/n, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil.
Department of Animal Production, Institute of Animal Husbandry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), 238.970-00, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020 Sep;52(5):2659-2666. doi: 10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8. Epub 2020 May 29.
This study aimed to evaluate different scenarios (year, supplementation level) about economic results of beef cattle production during rearing and finishing phase in Brazilian's tropical pastures. Four scenarios were evaluated in combination with fourteen supplements, and it was originated from some research developed inside Forage Crops and Grasslands section from São Paulo State University among years 2011 and 2014. The economic evaluation was analyzed by operating cost, total operational costs, gross revenue, operating profit, and financial net income. Besides profitability, internal rate of return (IRR), benefit/cost ratio (B:C), and simple payback period (SPP) were calculated too. During rearing phase, the best result was observed for scenario 2 (2012), supplement 3.2 (mineral mix) with values of 11 cycles, 26.3%, 9.30%, and 0.39 for SPP, profitability, IRR, and B:C ratio, respectively. Already to finishing phase, the best scenario was 3 (2013), supplement 10 (multiple supplement with supplementation level equal 1.0% body weight), which obtained 4 cycles, 68.7%, 27.00%, and 2.34 for the same variables above mentioned. Results were consistent being that higher IRR and profitability occurred when using low supplementation level. Hence, the economic responses from different scenarios (years and supplements) can alter the final livestock farm financial statement.
本研究旨在评估巴西热带牧场肉牛育肥和育成阶段不同情况(年份、补充水平)下的经济效益。结合14种补充剂评估了4种情况,这些数据源自圣保罗大学饲料作物与草原部门在2011年至2014年期间开展的一些研究。通过运营成本、总运营成本、毛收入、运营利润和财务净收入对经济评估进行分析。除了盈利能力外,还计算了内部收益率(IRR)、效益/成本比(B:C)和简单回收期(SPP)。在育肥阶段,情景2(2012年)、补充剂3.2(矿物质混合物)的效果最佳,其SPP、盈利能力、IRR和B:C比的值分别为11个周期、26.3%、9.30%和0.39。在育成阶段,最佳情景是情景3(2013年)、补充剂10(补充水平等于体重1.0%的复合补充剂),上述相同变量的值分别为4个周期、68.7%、27.00%和2.34。结果一致表明,使用低补充水平时,IRR和盈利能力更高。因此,不同情况(年份和补充剂)下的经济反应会改变最终的畜牧场财务报表。