• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:250 例连续病例的种族考虑。

Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: racial considerations for 250 consecutive cases.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Section of Urology, Augusta University, 1120 15th Street, BA-8414, Augusta, GA, 30912-4050, USA.

Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):221-228. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01096-1. Epub 2020 May 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-020-01096-1
PMID:32472391
Abstract

Our objective is to report the functional and oncologic outcomes of a cohort of 250 consecutive prostate cancer patients undergoing a Retzius-sparing approach and to assess for racial differences in continence outcomes. This was a prospective, single-center, case series of 250 consecutive prostate cancer patients who underwent a Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon between May 2015 and April 2019. Our primary objective was to report post-operative continence outcomes of patients undergoing this technique. Continence was defined as using zero or one precautionary pad per day. Median follow-up was 24.0 months [interquartile range (IQR) 18.0-30.0 months]. Median age and body mass index were 62.0 years (IQR 57.0-67.0) and 29.0 kg/m (IQR 26.0-33.0), respectively. Median PSA was 8.22 ng/ml (IQR 5.74-13.31). 84.8% of patients were intermediate risk or high risk pre-operatively, as per AUA/ASTRO/SUO guidelines. 96.0% had Gleason Score 7 or worse disease on final pathologic analysis. Positive margin incidence was 18.1% and 44.4% in patients with pT2 and pT3 disease, respectively, of which 75.4% were unifocal. Immediate continence (i.e., continence achieved within 1 month post-operatively) was achieved in 45.2% of patients. Three-month and 1-year continence rates were 70.0% and 92.0%, respectively. Caucasian patients experienced earlier return of continence (77% versus 65% at 3 months) compared to African American patients. IPSS scores gradually improved from 8.0 pre-operatively to 4.0 1-year later. Median PSA level was 0.01 ng/ml (IQR 0.01-9.01) post-operatively. Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is an oncologically safe surgical technique with excellent short- and long-term continence outcomes. Caucasian patients may have earlier return of continence compared to African Americans.

摘要

我们的目的是报告 250 例连续前列腺癌患者接受保留耻骨后间隙入路的功能和肿瘤学结果,并评估种族间控尿结果的差异。这是一项前瞻性、单中心、病例系列研究,共纳入 250 例连续前列腺癌患者,均由一位外科医生于 2015 年 5 月至 2019 年 4 月期间行保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。我们的主要目的是报告采用该技术的患者术后控尿结果。控尿定义为每天使用零或一片预防性尿垫。中位随访时间为 24.0 个月(IQR 18.0-30.0 个月)。中位年龄和体重指数分别为 62.0 岁(IQR 57.0-67.0)和 29.0kg/m(IQR 26.0-33.0)。中位 PSA 为 8.22ng/ml(IQR 5.74-13.31)。84.8%的患者根据 AUA/ASTRO/SUO 指南术前为中危或高危。96.0%的患者最终病理分析为 Gleason 评分 7 或更差。pT2 和 pT3 疾病患者的阳性切缘发生率分别为 18.1%和 44.4%,其中 75.4%为单灶性。45.2%的患者术后 1 个月内实现即刻控尿(即术后 1 个月内获得控尿)。3 个月和 1 年的控尿率分别为 70.0%和 92.0%。与非裔美国人相比,白人患者更早恢复控尿(3 个月时为 77%,65%)。IPSS 评分从术前的 8.0 逐渐改善到术后 1 年的 4.0。术后中位 PSA 水平为 0.01ng/ml(IQR 0.01-9.01)。保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术是一种具有良好短期和长期控尿效果的肿瘤学安全手术技术。与非裔美国人相比,白人患者可能更早恢复控尿。

相似文献

1
Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: racial considerations for 250 consecutive cases.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:250 例连续病例的种族考虑。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):221-228. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01096-1. Epub 2020 May 29.
2
Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Safe Surgical Technique with Superior Continence Outcomes.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:一种具有卓越控尿效果的安全手术技术。
J Endourol. 2017 Dec;31(12):1244-1250. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0490.
3
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.保留Retzius间隙与标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2.
4
Early Experience with Salvage Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes.保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术的早期经验:肿瘤学和功能结果。
Urology. 2021 Mar;149:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.029. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
6
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy improves early recovery of urinary continence: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial with a 1-year follow-up.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术可改善早期尿控恢复:一项随机、对照、单盲临床试验,随访 1 年。
BJU Int. 2020 Nov;126(5):633-640. doi: 10.1111/bju.15195. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
7
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
8
Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series.保留耻骨前列腺悬韧带与标准机器人前列腺切除术的疗效比较:一项国际多外科医生系列研究。
J Urol. 2021 Nov;206(5):1184-1191. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001939. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
9
Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates.保留Retzius 膜与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:即时控尿率的前瞻性随机比较。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2187-2196. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6499-z. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
10
Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的功能恢复、肿瘤学结果和术后并发症:比较保留耻骨前列腺韧带和标准方法的循证分析。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1210-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.115. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of transperitoneal anterior, retzius-sparing, extraperitoneal, transvesical and perineal approaches on urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.经腹膜前入路、保留Retzius间隙的腹膜外入路、经膀胱入路和会阴入路对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控恢复的影响:一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1038/s41391-025-00943-2.
2
Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review (French ccAFU).挽救性根治性前列腺切除术治疗复发性前列腺癌:一项系统评价(法国ccAFU)
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;15(22):5485. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225485.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Associated with Less Bladder Neck Descent and Better Early Continence Outcome.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与较少的膀胱颈下移及更好的早期控尿结果相关。
Anticancer Res. 2018 Jan;38(1):345-351. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12228.
2
Pentafecta Outcomes of 230 Cases of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Bilateral Neurovascular Bundle Preservation.230例保留双侧神经血管束的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的五项完美结局
Anticancer Res. 2015 Sep;35(9):5007-13.
3
The Index of the Pelvic Brim as a Basis of Classification.
Salvage Retzius-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Review of Complications, Functional Outcomes, and Oncologic Outcomes.
挽救性保直肠前列腺切除术:并发症、功能结局和肿瘤学结局的综述。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Dec 8;29(12):9733-9743. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120764.
4
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Results from a Large Single-institution Series.保留雷济厄斯间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌患者:来自大型单机构系列研究的结果
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Mar 4;38:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.007. eCollection 2022 Apr.
作为分类基础的骨盆入口指数。
J Anat Physiol. 1885 Oct;20(Pt 1):125-43.