• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《平价医疗法案》加强医疗保险福利对美国老年人预防性服务利用的影响

Effects of the Affordable Care Act's enhancement of Medicare benefits on preventive services utilization among older adults in the U.S.

作者信息

Toseef Mohammad Usama, Jensen Gail A, Tarraf Wassim

机构信息

Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, 87 East Ferry Street, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; Department of Economics, Wayne State University, Faculty/Administration Bldg, 656 W. Kirby St 2074, FAB, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, 87 East Ferry Street, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; Department of Healthcare Sciences, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2020 Sep;138:106148. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106148. Epub 2020 May 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106148
PMID:32473266
Abstract

Since 2011, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires the provision of certain recommended clinical preventive services without cost-sharing for individuals in Medicare. We re-visited the effects of the ACA on preventive services utilization under Medicare, using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and examined the ACA's longer-term effects on preventive services utilization among Medicare beneficiaries. We analyzed nationally representative data on non-institutionalized Medicare beneficiaries (n = 27,124) from the 2006-2010 and 2012-2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Preventive services of interest were cholesterol test, blood pressure test, flu shot, endoscopy, blood stool test, clinical breast exam, mammography and prostate exam. We estimated propensity score weighted difference-in-difference (DID) models to test for differences in preventive services utilization based on Medicare insurance status. Nationwide, among beneficiaries with traditional Medicare only, who stood to gain the most from eliminating cost-sharing for preventive services, the percentage of women receiving clinical breast exams rose post-reform (Δ = 8.1%; p < 0.015) as compared to Medicare beneficiaries with supplemental private coverage, while at the same time the percentage receiving other preventive services did not change post-reform (all p > 0.05). Based on this analysis of MEPS data spanning 2006-2016, the ACA's enhancement of Medicare coverage had only modest effects on the percentage of beneficiaries receiving a range of preventive services. Medicare beneficiaries should be better informed of the availability of these services and encouraged by their physicians to avail the no cost-sharing incentive of these reforms.

摘要

自2011年起,《平价医疗法案》(ACA)要求为参加医疗保险的个人提供某些推荐的临床预防服务,且无需分担费用。我们利用医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)的数据,重新审视了ACA对医疗保险下预防服务利用情况的影响,并研究了ACA对医疗保险受益人预防服务利用的长期影响。我们分析了2006 - 2010年和2012 - 2016年医疗支出面板调查中具有全国代表性的非机构化医疗保险受益人的数据(n = 27,124)。感兴趣的预防服务包括胆固醇检测、血压检测、流感疫苗接种、内窥镜检查、大便潜血检测、临床乳房检查、乳房X光检查和前列腺检查。我们估计了倾向得分加权差异-in-差异(DID)模型,以检验基于医疗保险状况的预防服务利用差异。在全国范围内,仅参加传统医疗保险的受益人中,那些从消除预防服务费用分担中获益最多的人,与拥有补充私人保险的医疗保险受益人相比,改革后接受临床乳房检查的女性比例有所上升(Δ = 8.1%;p < 0.015),而与此同时,接受其他预防服务的比例在改革后没有变化(所有p > 0.05)。基于对2006 - 2016年MEPS数据的分析,ACA对医疗保险覆盖范围的扩大对接受一系列预防服务的受益人的比例影响不大。医疗保险受益人应该更好地了解这些服务的可用性,并受到医生的鼓励,利用这些改革的无费用分担激励措施。

相似文献

1
Effects of the Affordable Care Act's enhancement of Medicare benefits on preventive services utilization among older adults in the U.S.《平价医疗法案》加强医疗保险福利对美国老年人预防性服务利用的影响
Prev Med. 2020 Sep;138:106148. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106148. Epub 2020 May 27.
2
A slow start: Use of preventive services among seniors following the Affordable Care Act's enhancement of Medicare benefits in the U.S.缓慢的开端:美国《平价医疗法案》加强医疗保险福利后老年人预防性服务的使用情况
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
3
Has recommended preventive service use increased after elimination of cost-sharing as part of the Affordable Care Act in the United States?在美国,作为《平价医疗法案》的一部分,取消费用分担后,推荐的预防性服务使用情况是否有所增加?
Prev Med. 2015 Sep;78:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
4
Variation of preventive service utilization by state Medicaid coverage, cost-sharing, and Medicaid expansion status.各州医疗补助保险覆盖范围、费用分担和医疗补助扩展状况对预防服务利用率的影响。
Prev Med. 2018 Oct;115:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Effectiveness of Medicare cost-sharing elimination for Cancer screening on utilization.医疗保险消除癌症筛查费用分担对利用率的有效性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4135-9.
6
Impact of The Affordable Care Act's Elimination of Cost-Sharing on the Guideline-Concordant Utilization of Cancer Preventive Screenings in the United States Using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.《平价医疗法案》取消费用分摊对美国癌症预防筛查指南一致使用情况的影响:基于医疗支出面板调查的研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Mar 1;7(1):36. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7010036.
7
Improvement in preventive care of young adults after the affordable care act: the affordable care act is helping.平价医疗法案实施后,美国年轻人预防保健的改善情况:平价医疗法案正在发挥作用。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Dec;168(12):1101-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1691.
8
Existing Medicaid beneficiaries left off the Affordable Care Act's prevention bandwagon.现有医疗补助受助人被排除在平价医疗法案的预防行列之外。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jul;32(7):1188-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0224.
9
Emergency department and inpatient utilization among U.S. older adults with multiple chronic conditions: a post-reform update.美国患有多种慢性病的老年患者在急诊部门和住院治疗中的利用情况:改革后更新。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4902-7.
10
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act's Dependent Coverage Mandate on Use of Dental Treatments and Preventive Services.《平价医疗法案》受抚养人保险强制规定对牙科治疗和预防服务使用情况的影响
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55(9):841-847. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000775.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status of cancer education in developing and developed countries: identifying the disparities and bridging the gap.发展中国家和发达国家癌症教育的现状:识别差异并弥合差距。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 13;13:1608525. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1608525. eCollection 2025.
2
Longitudinal analysis of Annual Wellness Visit use among Medicare enrollees: Provider, enrollee, and clinic factors.医疗保险参保者年度健康检查使用情况的纵向分析:提供者、参保者及诊所因素
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Mar;73(3):759-770. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19263. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
3
Contemporary National Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Limb Ischemia.
当代急性肢体缺血的全国发病率及治疗结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;110(Pt B):224-235. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.032. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
4
Regional and rural-urban patterns in the prevalence of diagnosed hypertension among older U.S. adults with diabetes, 2005-2017.2005-2017 年美国老年糖尿病患者诊断性高血压的地区和城乡流行模式。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 16;24(1):1326. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18802-5.
5
Adoption and Value of the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit: A Mixed-Methods Study.采用和评估医疗保险年度体检:一项混合方法研究。
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Aug;80(4):433-443. doi: 10.1177/10775587231166037. Epub 2023 Apr 26.