Pieri Marina, Pappalardo Federico
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS ISMETT, UPMC Italy, Via E. Tricomi 5, Palermo, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;316:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.080. Epub 2020 May 28.
Background Bedside insertion of Impella percutaneous ventricular assistant device (pVAD) (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) under transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) guidance is an attractive strategy enabling lifesaving treatment in patients with cardiogenic shock and who cannot to be transported promptly to the catheterization laboratory (Cathlab). Methods In this retrospective, single-center study, we reviewed all consecutive patients supported with Impella pVAD for CS. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of those who underwent Impella pVAD insertion under fluoroscopic guidance (Fluoro group) in the Cathlab with those who underwent insertion under TEE guidance at bedside (TEE group). Results: Between February 2013 and April 2018, a total of 150 consecutive patients with CS were supported with Impella. Fifty-five (38%) were in TEE group and 95 (62%) in Fluoro group. Impella insertion was successful in all the patients. At the time of Impella insertion patients among the TEE group had higher incidence of refractory hemodynamic collapse (87% vs 53%; p < 0.001) and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (62% vs 35%, p=0.002). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the TEE group (55% vs. 31%, p=0.04). Rates of Impella-related complications were not different between the two groups, except for higher requirement for renal replacement therapy in the TEE group (35% vs 17%; p = 0.004). Conclusions Emergent Impella insertion with TEE guidance is feasible, safe and effective in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock.
在经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导下经皮床边插入Impella心室辅助装置(pVAD)(Abiomed公司,马萨诸塞州丹弗斯)是一种有吸引力的策略,可对心源性休克且无法迅速转运至导管室(Cathlab)的患者进行挽救生命的治疗。方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们回顾了所有连续使用Impella pVAD支持治疗心源性休克的患者。我们比较了在导管室荧光镜引导下(荧光镜组)插入Impella pVAD的患者与在床边TEE引导下插入(TEE组)的患者的特征和结局。结果:2013年2月至2018年4月期间,共有150例连续的心源性休克患者接受了Impella支持治疗。TEE组55例(38%),荧光镜组95例(62%)。所有患者Impella插入均成功。在插入Impella时,TEE组患者难治性血流动力学崩溃的发生率更高(87%对53%;p<0.001),静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合的发生率也更高(62%对35%,p=0.002)。TEE组的院内死亡率显著更高(55%对31%,p=0.04)。两组之间Impella相关并发症的发生率没有差异,但TEE组对肾脏替代治疗的需求更高(35%对17%;p = 0.004)。结论:在TEE引导下紧急插入Impella对心源性休克的危重症患者是可行、安全且有效的。