• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型半自动超声分割技术评估平均区域股骨关节软骨厚度的可靠性。

Reliability of a Novel Semiautomated Ultrasound Segmentation Technique for Assessing Average Regional Femoral Articular Cartilage Thickness.

出版信息

J Sport Rehabil. 2020 May 29;29(7):1042-1046. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0476. Print 2020 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1123/jsr.2019-0476
PMID:32473587
Abstract

CONTEXT

Ultrasound imaging is a clinically feasible tool to assess femoral articular cartilage and may have utility in tracking early knee osteoarthritis development. Traditional assessment techniques focus on measurements at a single location, which can be challenging to adopt for novice raters.

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a novel semiautomated ultrasound segmentation technique and determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of average regional femoral articular cartilage thickness and echo intensity of a novice and expert rater.

DESIGN

Descriptive observational study.

SETTING

Orthopedic clinic.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen participants (mean [SD]; age 23.5 [4.6] y, height = 172.6 [9.3] cm, mass = 79.8 [15.7] kg) with a unilateral history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction participated.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

One rater captured anterior femoral cartilage images of the participants' contralateral knees using a transverse suprapatellar ultrasound assessment. The total femoral cartilage cross-sectional area of each image was segmented by a novice and expert rater. A novel custom program automatically separated the cartilage segmentations into medial, lateral, and intercondylar regions to determine the cross-sectional area and cartilage length. The average cartilage thickness in each region was calculated by dividing the cross-sectional area by the cartilage length. Echo intensity was calculated as the average gray-scale pixel value of each region. Two-way random effect intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC) for absolute agreement were used to determine the interrater reliability between a novice and expert rater, as well as the intrarater reliability of the novice rater.

RESULTS

The novice rater demonstrated excellent intrarater (ICC [2,k] range = .993-.997) and interrater (ICC [2,k] range = .944-.991) reliability with the expert rater of all femoral articular cartilage average thickness and echo intensity regions.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel semiautomated average cartilage thickness and echo-intensity assessment is efficient, systematic, and reliable between an expert and novice rater with minimal training.

摘要

背景

超声成像是一种评估股骨关节软骨的临床可行工具,可能有助于跟踪早期膝骨关节炎的发展。传统的评估技术侧重于单点测量,这对于新手评估者来说具有一定挑战性。

目的

引入一种新的半自动超声分割技术,并确定新手和专家评估者测量股骨关节软骨平均厚度和回声强度的组内和组间可靠性。

设计

描述性观察研究。

设置

矫形科诊所。

患者或其他参与者

15 名参与者(平均[标准差];年龄 23.5 [4.6]岁,身高= 172.6 [9.3]厘米,体重= 79.8 [15.7]千克),单侧前交叉韧带重建史。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

一名评估者使用髌上横向超声评估技术获取参与者对侧膝关节的前股骨软骨图像。新手和专家评估者分别对每个图像的整个股骨软骨横截面积进行分割。一个新的定制程序自动将软骨分割为内侧、外侧和髁间区域,以确定横截面积和软骨长度。每个区域的平均软骨厚度通过将横截面积除以软骨长度来计算。回声强度通过计算每个区域的平均灰度像素值来表示。使用双向随机效应组内相关系数(ICC)评估绝对一致性来确定新手和专家评估者之间的组间可靠性,以及新手评估者的组内可靠性。

结果

新手评估者与专家评估者在所有股骨关节软骨平均厚度和回声强度区域的组内(ICC[2,k]范围=。993-.997)和组间(ICC[2,k]范围=。944-.991)可靠性均表现出优异的可靠性。

结论

新型半自动平均软骨厚度和回声强度评估方法在经过最少培训后,在专家和新手评估者之间是高效、系统和可靠的。

相似文献

1
Reliability of a Novel Semiautomated Ultrasound Segmentation Technique for Assessing Average Regional Femoral Articular Cartilage Thickness.一种新型半自动超声分割技术评估平均区域股骨关节软骨厚度的可靠性。
J Sport Rehabil. 2020 May 29;29(7):1042-1046. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0476. Print 2020 Sep 1.
2
Validating a Semi-Automated Technique for Segmenting Femoral Articular Cartilage on Ultrasound Images.验证一种用于在超声图像上分割股骨关节软骨的半自动技术。
Cartilage. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):19476035221093069. doi: 10.1177/19476035221093069.
3
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Femoral Cartilage in Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study.超声评估前交叉韧带重建患者的股骨软骨:病例对照研究。
J Athl Train. 2018 Nov;53(11):1082-1088. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-376-17. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Femoral Cartilage Ultrasound Echo Intensity Associates with Arthroscopic Cartilage Damage.股骨软骨超声回声强度与关节镜软骨损伤相关。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Jan;47(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
5
The Transverse Infrapatellar View: A New Ultrasound Technique to Measure Distal Femoral Cartilage Thickness.髌下横切面:一种新的超声技术,用于测量股骨远端软骨厚度。
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Mar;39(3):463-470. doi: 10.1002/jum.15122. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
6
Expert versus novice interrater reliability and criterion validity of the landing error scoring system.专家与新手间信度和着陆错误评分系统的标准效度。
J Sport Rehabil. 2010 Feb;19(1):41-56. doi: 10.1123/jsr.19.1.41.
7
Pre-Operative Femoral Cartilage Ultrasound Characteristics Are Altered in People Who Report Symptoms at 1 year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.术前股骨软骨超声特征在 ACL 重建后 1 年有症状的人群中发生改变。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1976-1984. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
8
Ultrasonographic measurement of the femoral cartilage thickness in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征患者股骨软骨厚度的超声测量。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Jan;97(1):235-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.024. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
9
The Reliability of Suprapatellar Transverse Sonographic Assessment of Femoral Trochlear Cartilage Thickness in Healthy Adults.髌上横切面超声评估健康成年人股骨滑车软骨厚度的可靠性。
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Apr;38(4):935-946. doi: 10.1002/jum.14775. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Longitudinal Changes in Ultrasound-Assessed Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Individuals from 4 to 6 Months Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建后 4 至 6 个月个体的超声评估股骨软骨厚度的纵向变化。
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):738S-746S. doi: 10.1177/19476035211038749. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Wireless vs. Traditional Ultrasound Assessed Knee Cartilage Outcomes Utilizing Automated Gain and Normalization Techniques.使用自动增益和归一化技术评估膝关节软骨结果的无线超声与传统超声比较
Osteoarthr Imaging. 2025 Mar;5(1). doi: 10.1016/j.ostima.2024.100260. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Femoral cartilage ultrasound echo-intensity is a valid measure of cartilage composition.股骨软骨超声回声强度是软骨成分的有效测量指标。
J Orthop Res. 2024 Apr;42(4):729-736. doi: 10.1002/jor.25722. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
3
Validating a Semi-Automated Technique for Segmenting Femoral Articular Cartilage on Ultrasound Images.
验证一种用于在超声图像上分割股骨关节软骨的半自动技术。
Cartilage. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):19476035221093069. doi: 10.1177/19476035221093069.
4
Longitudinal Changes in Ultrasound-Assessed Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Individuals from 4 to 6 Months Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建后 4 至 6 个月个体的超声评估股骨软骨厚度的纵向变化。
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):738S-746S. doi: 10.1177/19476035211038749. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
Pre-Operative Femoral Cartilage Ultrasound Characteristics Are Altered in People Who Report Symptoms at 1 year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.术前股骨软骨超声特征在 ACL 重建后 1 年有症状的人群中发生改变。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1976-1984. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
6
Femoral Cartilage Ultrasound Echo Intensity Associates with Arthroscopic Cartilage Damage.股骨软骨超声回声强度与关节镜软骨损伤相关。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Jan;47(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Oct 17.