Harkey Matthew S, Michel Nicholas, Kuenze Christopher, Fajardo Ryan, Salzler Matt, Driban Jeffrey B, Hacihaliloglu Ilker
Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Cartilage. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):19476035221093069. doi: 10.1177/19476035221093069.
To validate a semi-automated technique to segment ultrasound-assessed femoral cartilage without compromising segmentation accuracy to a traditional manual segmentation technique in participants with an anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL).
We recruited 27 participants with a primary unilateral ACL injury at a pre-operative clinic visit. One investigator performed a transverse suprapatellar ultrasound scan with the participant's ACL injured knee in maximum flexion. Three femoral cartilage ultrasound images were recorded. A single expert reader manually segmented the femoral cartilage cross-sectional area in each image. In addition, we created a semi-automatic program to segment the cartilage using a random walker-based method. We quantified the average cartilage thickness and echo-intensity for the manual and semi-automated segmentations. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to validate the semi-automated technique to the manual segmentation for assessing average cartilage thickness and echo-intensity. A dice correlation coefficient was used to quantify the overlap between the segmentations created with the semi-automated and manual techniques.
For average cartilage thickness, there was excellent reliability (ICC = 0.99) and a small mean difference (+0.8%) between the manual and semi-automated segmentations. For average echo-intensity, there was excellent reliability (ICC = 0.97) and a small mean difference (-2.5%) between the manual and semi-automated segmentations. The average dice correlation coefficient between the manual segmentation and semi-automated segmentation was 0.90, indicating high overlap between techniques.
Our novel semi-automated segmentation technique is a valid method that requires less technical expertise and time than manual segmentation in patients after ACL injury.
验证一种半自动技术,用于在不影响传统手动分割技术准确性的前提下,对前交叉韧带损伤(ACL)参与者的超声评估股骨软骨进行分割。
我们在术前门诊招募了27名原发性单侧ACL损伤的参与者。一名研究人员在参与者ACL损伤的膝关节最大屈曲时进行髌上横切面超声扫描。记录三张股骨软骨超声图像。一名专业阅片者手动分割每张图像中的股骨软骨横截面积。此外,我们创建了一个半自动程序,使用基于随机游走的方法对软骨进行分割。我们对手动和半自动分割的平均软骨厚度和回声强度进行了量化。组内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman图用于验证半自动技术与手动分割在评估平均软骨厚度和回声强度方面的一致性。使用骰子相关系数来量化半自动和手动技术创建的分割之间的重叠程度。
对于平均软骨厚度,手动和半自动分割之间具有出色的可靠性(ICC = 0.99),平均差异较小(+0.8%)。对于平均回声强度,手动和半自动分割之间具有出色的可靠性(ICC = 0.97),平均差异较小(-2.5%)。手动分割和半自动分割之间的平均骰子相关系数为0.90,表明两种技术之间的重叠程度较高。
我们新颖的半自动分割技术是一种有效的方法,与ACL损伤患者的手动分割相比,所需的技术专业知识和时间更少。