Huang Mei-Yang, Son KeunBaDa, Lee Kyu-Bok
Graduate student, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Graduate student, Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jun;125(6):911-917. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.034. Epub 2020 May 27.
The introduction of intraoral scanners has increased the use of digital technology in dental procedures. However, data on the accuracy of abutment scans according to the distance between the adjacent tooth and the abutment are lacking.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the 3D accuracy of abutment scans according to the distance between the adjacent tooth and the abutment.
A right maxillary first molar was removed and scanned with an industrial 3D scanner, and the image was extracted as a standard tessellation language (STL) file. Six virtual models with 1-mm, 1.5-mm, 2-mm, 2.5-mm, 3-mm, and 3.5-mm spacing between abutment teeth and adjacent teeth were fabricated with an industrial computer-aided design (CAD) software program. Then, 6 master models were fabricated with a 3D printer and copied into dental gypsum. The replicated models (reference models) were scanned 20 times with an intraoral scanner (CS3600); the resulting model was referred to as the CAD test model. The adjacent teeth of the reference models were deleted, and the models were scanned with a laboratory scanner; the resulting model was referred to as the CAD reference model. The CAD reference model was used to measure the scan accuracy in 4 directions (buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal) and 4 areas (occlusal, angle, axial, and margin) by using a 3D inspection software program. The Friedman nonparametric test (α=.05) was used for comparison, and post hoc testing was performed by using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Bonferroni correction method (direction and area variables; α=.0008, distance variable; α=.0003).
The buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal directions of the abutment were significantly different according to distance (P<.001). The margin, axial, angle, and occlusal regions of the abutment were also significantly different according to distance (P<.001).
The distance between the abutment teeth and adjacent teeth affected the accuracy of the abutment scan. In intraoral scanning, when the distance between the abutment teeth and the adjacent teeth is more than 1.5 mm, the scan error does not increase, and more accurate scan data can be obtained.
口腔内扫描仪的引入增加了数字技术在牙科手术中的应用。然而,关于基牙扫描精度与相邻牙齿和基牙之间距离关系的数据尚缺。
本体外研究的目的是根据相邻牙齿与基牙之间的距离比较基牙扫描的三维精度。
拔除右上颌第一磨牙并用工业三维扫描仪进行扫描,图像以标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件形式提取。使用工业计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件程序制作6个虚拟模型,基牙与相邻牙齿之间的间距分别为1毫米、1.5毫米、2毫米、2.5毫米、3毫米和3.5毫米。然后,用三维打印机制作6个主模型并复制到牙科石膏中。用口腔内扫描仪(CS3600)对复制模型(参考模型)进行20次扫描;所得模型称为CAD测试模型。删除参考模型的相邻牙齿,并用实验室扫描仪对模型进行扫描;所得模型称为CAD参考模型。使用三维检测软件程序,在4个方向(颊侧、舌侧、近中侧和远中侧)和4个区域(咬合面、角部、轴面和边缘)测量CAD参考模型的扫描精度。采用Friedman非参数检验(α = 0.05)进行比较,并使用Mann-Whitney U检验和Bonferroni校正方法进行事后检验(方向和区域变量;α = 0.0008,距离变量;α = 0.0003)。
基牙的颊侧、舌侧、近中侧和远中侧方向根据距离有显著差异(P < 0.001)。基牙的边缘、轴面、角部和咬合面区域根据距离也有显著差异(P < 0.001)。
基牙与相邻牙齿之间的距离影响基牙扫描的精度。在口腔内扫描时,当基牙与相邻牙齿之间的距离大于1.5毫米时,扫描误差不会增加,并且可以获得更准确的扫描数据。