• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在河流流域监测计划中实施和整合微生物源追踪。

Implementation and integration of microbial source tracking in a river watershed monitoring plan.

机构信息

UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Earth Institute, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Computational Genomics Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 20;736:139573. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139573. Epub 2020 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139573
PMID:32474276
Abstract

Fecal pollution of water bodies poses a serious threat for public health and ecosystems. Microbial source tracking (MST) is used to track the source of this pollution facilitating better management of pollution at the source. In this study we tested 12 MST markers to track human, ruminant, sheep, horse, pig and gull pollution to assess their usefulness as an effective management tool of water quality. First, the potential of the selected markers to track the source was evaluated using fresh fecal samples. Subsequently, we evaluated their performance in a catchment with different impacts, considering land use and environmental conditions. All MST markers showed high sensitivity and specificity, although none achieved 100% for both. Although some of the MST markers were detected in hosts other than the intended ones, their abundance in the target group was always several orders of magnitude higher than in the non-target hosts, demonstrating their suitability to distinguish between sources of pollution. The MST analysis matched the land use in the watershed allowing an accurate assessment of the main sources of pollution, in this case mainly human and ruminant pollution. Correlating environmental parameters including temperature and rainfall with MST markers provided insight into the dynamics of the pollution in the catchment. The levels of the human marker showed a significant negative correlation with rainfall in human polluted areas suggesting a dilution of the pollution, whereas at agricultural areas the ruminant marker increased with rainfall. There were no seasonal differences in the levels of human marker, indicating human pollution as a constant pressure throughout the year, whereas the levels of the ruminant marker was influenced by the seasons, being more abundant in summer and autumn. MST analysis integrated with land use and environmental data can improve the management of fecal polluted areas and set up best practice.

摘要

水体粪便污染对公共卫生和生态系统构成严重威胁。微生物源追踪 (MST) 用于追踪污染来源,从而更好地进行源头污染管理。在本研究中,我们测试了 12 种 MST 标记物,以追踪人类、反刍动物、绵羊、马、猪和海鸥的污染情况,评估它们作为水质有效管理工具的有用性。首先,使用新鲜粪便样本评估所选标记物追踪来源的潜力。随后,我们在具有不同影响的集水区中评估了它们的性能,考虑了土地利用和环境条件。所有 MST 标记物均表现出高灵敏度和特异性,尽管没有一种标记物在两者上均达到 100%。尽管一些 MST 标记物在预期宿主之外的宿主中被检测到,但它们在目标群体中的丰度始终比非目标宿主高几个数量级,证明它们适合区分污染来源。MST 分析与流域中的土地利用相匹配,能够准确评估主要污染源,在这种情况下,主要是人类和反刍动物污染。将环境参数(包括温度和降雨量)与 MST 标记物相关联,提供了对集水区污染动态的深入了解。人类标记物的水平与人类污染区域的降雨量呈显著负相关,表明污染被稀释,而在农业区域,反刍动物标记物随降雨量增加。人类标记物的水平没有季节性差异,表明人类污染是全年持续存在的压力,而反刍动物标记物的水平受季节影响,夏季和秋季更为丰富。与土地利用和环境数据相结合的 MST 分析可以改善粪便污染区域的管理,并制定最佳实践。

相似文献

1
Implementation and integration of microbial source tracking in a river watershed monitoring plan.在河流流域监测计划中实施和整合微生物源追踪。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 20;736:139573. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139573. Epub 2020 May 21.
2
Microbial source tracking (MST) in Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area: Seasonal and precipitation trends in MST marker concentrations, and associations with E. coli levels, pathogenic marker presence, and land use.微生物源追踪(MST)在查塔胡奇河国家娱乐区:MST 标记浓度的季节性和降水趋势,以及与大肠杆菌水平、病原体标记存在和土地利用的关系。
Water Res. 2020 Mar 15;171:115435. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115435. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
3
Human and animal microbial source tracking in a tropical river with multiple land use activities.热带河流水体中多土地利用活动下的人类和动物微生物源追踪。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 May;222(4):645-654. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
4
Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.41 种微生物源追踪方法的性能评估:一项 27 个实验室的评估研究。
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6812-28. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.046. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
5
Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.微生物和化学源追踪标志物用于识别加拿大安大略省多伦多亨伯河及其相关雨水排放口粪便污染源的比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Oct 14;82(21):6357-6366. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01675-16. Print 2016 Nov 1.
6
Microbial Source Tracking Using Quantitative and Digital PCR To Identify Sources of Fecal Contamination in Stormwater, River Water, and Beach Water in a Great Lakes Area of Concern.利用定量和数字 PCR 进行微生物源追踪,以识别五大湖关注区域内雨水、河水和海滩水中粪便污染的来源。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Oct 1;84(20). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01634-18. Print 2018 Oct 15.
7
Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.使用多种源追踪工具在选定集水区河段识别粪便来源。
J Environ Qual. 2007 Apr 5;36(3):718-29. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0246. Print 2007 May-Jun.
8
Microbial source tracking to elucidate the impact of land-use and physiochemical water quality on fecal contamination in a mixed land-use watershed.微生物源追踪以阐明土地利用和理化水质对混合土地利用流域粪便污染的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 May 10;872:162181. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162181. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
9
Elucidating fecal pollution patterns in alluvial water resources by linking standard fecal indicator bacteria to river connectivity and genetic microbial source tracking.通过将标准粪便指示菌与河流连通性和遗传微生物源追踪相结合,阐明冲积水资源中的粪便污染模式。
Water Res. 2020 Oct 1;184:116132. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116132. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
10
Using watershed characteristics to enhance fecal source identification.利用流域特征加强粪便来源识别。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jun 15;336:117642. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117642. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
SourceApp: A Novel Metagenomic Source Tracking Tool that can Distinguish between Fecal Microbiomes Using Genome-To-Source Associations Benchmarked Against Mixed Input Spike-In Mesocosms.SourceApp:一种新型宏基因组溯源工具,可利用与混合输入加标中宇宙基准的基因组与来源关联来区分粪便微生物群。
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 May 20;59(19):9507-9516. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c03603. Epub 2025 May 6.
2
SARS-CoV-2 presence in recreational seawater and evaluation of intestine permeability: experimental evidence of low impact on public health.SARS-CoV-2 在娱乐海水中的存在及肠道通透性评估:对公共健康影响较小的实验证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 4;12:1326453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1326453. eCollection 2024.
3
An overview of molecular markers for identification of non-human fecal pollution sources.
用于识别非人类粪便污染源的分子标记概述。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1256174. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1256174. eCollection 2023.
4
Environmental surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), perspectives from a national environmental regulator in 2023.2023 年,从国家环境监管机构角度看抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)的环境监测。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Mar;28(11). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.11.2200367.
5
Microbial Source Tracking as a Method of Determination of Beach Sand Contamination.微生物源追踪作为一种确定海滩沙污染的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;19(13):7934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137934.
6
Use of metagenomic microbial source tracking to investigate the source of a foodborne outbreak of cryptosporidiosis.使用宏基因组微生物源追踪技术调查隐孢子虫病食源性暴发的源头。
Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2021 Dec 21;26:e00142. doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00142. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Bacterial and Bacteriophage Antibiotic Resistance in Marine Bathing Waters in Relation to Rivers and Urban Streams.海水浴场中与河流和城市溪流相关的细菌及噬菌体抗生素耐药性
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jul 26;12:718234. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.718234. eCollection 2021.
8
Identifying Sources of Faecal Contamination in a Small Urban Stream Catchment: A Multiparametric Approach.识别城市小流域溪流中粪便污染的来源:一种多参数方法。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jun 29;12:661954. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.661954. eCollection 2021.
9
Synergistic Application of Molecular Markers and Community-Based Microbial Source Tracking Methods for Identification of Fecal Pollution in River Water During Dry and Wet Seasons.分子标记与基于群落的微生物源追踪方法在干湿季河水粪便污染识别中的协同应用
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jun 14;12:660368. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.660368. eCollection 2021.
10
The Use of Ribosomal RNA as a Microbial Source Tracking Target Highlights the Assay Host-Specificity Requirement in Water Quality Assessments.将核糖体RNA用作微生物源追踪目标凸显了水质评估中检测宿主特异性要求。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jun 2;12:673306. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.673306. eCollection 2021.