Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Paroninkuja 20, 04920 Saarentaus, Finland.
Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Ave, Charlottetown C1A 4P3, PE, Canada.
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jul;180:105028. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105028. Epub 2020 May 19.
Antibiotic dry cow therapy (DCT) is an important part of most mastitis control programs. Updating DCT recommendations is an ongoing topic due to the global problem of antimicrobial resistance. Finland, along with other Nordic countries, has implemented selective DCT for decades. Our study analyzed Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) information from 241 Finnish farmers who participated in a survey about their drying-off practices. The aim was to evaluate herd-level associations between milk somatic cell count (SCC), milk production, and various antimicrobial DCT approaches both cross-sectionally in 2016 and longitudinally in 2012-2016. The three DCT approaches in the study were selective, blanket, and no DCT use. An additional aim was to evaluate whether dynamic changes occurred in herd-average SCC and annual milk production over five years, and whether these potential changes differed between different DCT approaches. The method for the longitudinal analyses was growth modeling with random coefficient models. Differences in SCC and milk production between farms with different DCT approaches were minor. Regardless of the farm's DCT approach, annual milk production increased over the years, while average SCC was reasonably constant. The variability in SCC and milk production across all DCT groups was low between years, and most of the variability was between farms. Compared to other milking systems, farms with automatic milking system (AMS) had higher SCC, and in 2016 higher milk production. The results of this study suggest that it is possible to maintain low herd-average SCC and good milk production when using selective DCT and following the guidelines for prudent antimicrobial use. Average SCC and milk production varied across the herds, suggesting that advice on DCT practices should be herd-specific. The methodology of growth modeling using random coefficient models was applicable in analyzing longitudinal data, in which the time frame was relatively short and the number of herds was limited.
抗生素干奶牛疗法(DCT)是大多数乳腺炎控制计划的重要组成部分。由于全球抗菌药物耐药性问题,更新 DCT 建议是一个持续的话题。芬兰与其他北欧国家合作已经实施了选择性 DCT 几十年。我们的研究分析了来自 241 名参与有关干奶实践调查的芬兰农民的奶牛改良协会(DHI)信息。目的是评估 2016 年横断面和 2012-2016 年纵向奶牛水平的牛奶体细胞计数(SCC)、牛奶产量与各种抗菌 DCT 方法之间的关联。研究中的三种 DCT 方法为选择性、全面性和不使用 DCT。另一个目的是评估五年内 herd-average SCC 和年度牛奶产量是否发生动态变化,以及这些潜在变化是否因不同的 DCT 方法而有所不同。纵向分析的方法是使用随机系数模型的生长模型。不同 DCT 方法的农场之间 SCC 和牛奶产量的差异很小。无论农场的 DCT 方法如何,年度牛奶产量都逐年增加,而平均 SCC 相当稳定。所有 DCT 组之间 SCC 和牛奶产量的年度变化差异较小,大部分变化是在农场之间。与其他挤奶系统相比,采用自动挤奶系统(AMS)的农场 SCC 较高,2016 年牛奶产量较高。本研究结果表明,采用选择性 DCT 并遵循谨慎使用抗菌药物的指南,维持低 herd-average SCC 和良好的牛奶产量是可行的。平均 SCC 和牛奶产量在不同的畜群之间存在差异,这表明关于 DCT 实践的建议应该针对特定的畜群。使用随机系数模型的生长模型方法适用于分析纵向数据,其中时间框架相对较短,畜群数量有限。