Ut Ionela Delia, Berean Daniel Ionut, Bogdan Liviu Marian, Ciupe Simona, Gog Bogdan Sidonia
Department of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manastur 3--5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Department of Surgery and ATI, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Vet Sci. 2025 Jun 12;12(6):580. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12060580.
In recent decades, Blanket Dry Cow Therapy (BDCT) has been regarded as a cornerstone strategy for the control of mastitis in dairy cows during the dry period. However, concerns regarding the rising incidence of antibiotic resistance and the associated zoonotic risks have prompted a paradigm shift, leading to intensified research into alternative management approaches. In response, many countries have adopted a more targeted approach, known as Selective Dry Cow Therapy (SDCT), which focuses on the therapeutic use of antibiotics, administered only to cows or quarters that are either infected or at high risk of infection during the dry period. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the scientific literature regarding the main methods for selecting animals for SDCT, the impact of this strategy on udder health, milk production, farm economics, and antibiotic consumption, as well as the factors that may influence its effectiveness. Over time, a range of methods have been developed to identify infected animals, including bacteriological culture, somatic cell count (SCC), differential somatic cell count (DSCC), and the California Mastitis Test (CMT), which are often used alone or in combination with clinical mastitis history and/or parity. Among these methods, SCC has proven to be the most economically viable and best suited for practical use, while its combination with DSCC has been shown to significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy. According to the studies reviewed, SDCT is a safe and effective strategy for maintaining udder health and farm profitability, as long as infected cows are accurately identified, and internal teat sealants are used in quarters not treated with antibiotics during the dry period. However, since udder health is influenced by herd characteristics, management practices, and regional pathogens, the findings cannot be universally applied and must be adapted to each herd's specific conditions.
近几十年来,干奶期全群干奶疗法(BDCT)一直被视为奶牛干奶期控制乳腺炎的基石策略。然而,对抗生素耐药性上升及相关人畜共患病风险的担忧促使了一种范式转变,引发了对替代管理方法的深入研究。作为回应,许多国家采用了一种更具针对性的方法,即选择性干奶疗法(SDCT),该方法侧重于抗生素的治疗性使用,仅用于干奶期感染或有高感染风险的奶牛或乳房象限。本综述全面综合了关于SDCT动物选择主要方法的科学文献,该策略对乳房健康、产奶量、农场经济效益和抗生素使用的影响,以及可能影响其有效性的因素。随着时间的推移,已经开发出一系列方法来识别感染动物,包括细菌培养、体细胞计数(SCC)、差异体细胞计数(DSCC)和加利福尼亚乳腺炎检测(CMT),这些方法通常单独使用或与临床乳腺炎病史和/或胎次相结合使用。在这些方法中,SCC已被证明是最具经济可行性且最适合实际应用的,而其与DSCC的结合已显示可显著提高诊断准确性。根据所综述的研究,只要准确识别感染奶牛,并在干奶期未接受抗生素治疗的乳房象限使用乳头内密封剂,SDCT就是维持乳房健康和农场盈利能力的安全有效策略。然而,由于乳房健康受畜群特征、管理实践和区域病原体的影响,这些研究结果不能普遍适用,必须根据每个畜群的具体情况进行调整。