Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Sep;73(9):1306-1311. doi: 10.1002/acr.24334. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
To show the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) methotrexate (MTX) compared to oral MTX, alternative disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) monotherapy, biologic monotherapy, and combinations (conventional and biologic combination groups) in routine clinical practice.
Clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively analyzed for rheumatology clinic attendances at a large Northeast England hospital trust between January 2014 and January 2018. Rates of adverse events and stop events (transaminitis [serum alanine aminotransferase level of >80 units/liter] or neutropenia [neutrophil count of <2.0 × 10 /liter]) were calculated, with adjustment for duration of DMARD exposure.
In the present study, 8,394 patients received DMARDs, with 2,093 patients receiving oral MTX and 949 patients receiving SC MTX. The median dose was 15 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 10-20 mg) for oral MTX, and 20 mg (IQR 15-25 mg) for SC MTX (P < 0.0001). Continuation rates were higher for SC MTX therapy when adjusted for follow-up duration, with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.40-1.70) (P < 0.0001). For the time period assessed, 2,382 patients experienced 4,358 adverse events, with 1,711 incidents of transaminitis and 2,647 incidents of neutropenia recorded. Significantly fewer adverse events were observed in patients who received SC MTX monotherapy versus those who received biologic and combination DMARD therapies (P < 0.01). Compared to oral MTX, SC MTX was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward lower rates of neutropenia, but only a slightly higher rate of transaminitis (RR 1.26 [95% CI 1.07-1.48]) (P = 0.006), despite significantly higher doses of MTX.
Subcutaneous MTX is safe in routine clinical practice. This is the largest study yet reported on SC MTX and provides observational data that SC MTX is continued longer and better tolerated in patients compared to other therapy groups, especially oral MTX.
在常规临床实践中,展示与口服甲氨蝶呤(MTX)相比,皮下(SC)MTX 与其他疾病修正抗风湿药物(DMARD)单药治疗、生物单药治疗以及组合(常规和生物联合组)的安全性和疗效。
回顾性分析了 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间在英格兰东北部一家大型医院信托机构就诊的风湿科患者的临床和实验室数据。计算了不良反应和停药事件(血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶水平 >80 单位/升的转氨血症[transaminitis]或中性粒细胞计数 <2.0×10 /升的中性粒细胞减少症[neutropenia])的发生率,并对 DMARD 暴露时间进行了调整。
在本研究中,8394 名患者接受了 DMARD 治疗,其中 2093 名患者接受了口服 MTX 治疗,949 名患者接受了 SC MTX 治疗。口服 MTX 的中位剂量为 15 毫克(四分位间距[IQR] 10-20 毫克),SC MTX 的中位剂量为 20 毫克(IQR 15-25 毫克)(P<0.0001)。经调整随访时间后,SC MTX 治疗的持续率更高,比率比(RR)为 1.54(95%置信区间[95%CI] 1.40-1.70)(P<0.0001)。在所评估的时间段内,2382 名患者发生了 4358 起不良反应事件,其中 1711 起转氨血症和 2647 起中性粒细胞减少症。与接受生物和联合 DMARD 治疗的患者相比,接受 SC MTX 单药治疗的患者发生不良反应的比例显著较低(P<0.01)。与口服 MTX 相比,SC MTX 中性粒细胞减少症的发生率较低,但转氨血症的发生率略高(RR 1.26[95%CI 1.07-1.48])(P=0.006),尽管 MTX 的剂量明显更高。
在常规临床实践中,SC MTX 是安全的。这是迄今为止关于 SC MTX 的最大规模研究,提供了观察性数据,表明与其他治疗组相比,SC MTX 在患者中的持续时间更长,耐受性更好,尤其是与口服 MTX 相比。