Suppr超能文献

头对头、随机、交叉研究口服与皮下给予甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎患者:口服甲氨蝶呤剂量≥15mg 时药物暴露受限,通过皮下给予可能克服。

Head-to-head, randomised, crossover study of oral versus subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: drug-exposure limitations of oral methotrexate at doses ≥15 mg may be overcome with subcutaneous administration.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.

Clinical Development, Antares Pharma Inc, Ewing, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Aug;73(8):1549-51. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205228. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative bioavailability, safety and tolerability of oral methotrexate (MTX) and subcutaneous (SC) MTX administered via an auto-injector (MTXAI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

In this randomised, multicenter, open-label, three-way crossover study, patients ≥18 years with adult RA undergoing treatment with MTX for ≥3 months were assigned to receive MTX 10, 15, 20 and 25 mg weekly in a random sequence of three treatments: oral, SC into the abdomen and SC into the thigh. For 24 h after administration of each treatment, blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis and injection sites were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients completed the study. Systemic exposure of oral MTX plateaued at doses ≥15 mg/week. In contrast, SC MTX demonstrated a linear increase in systemic exposure that was greater than oral MTX at each dose. No unexpected AEs were noted for either formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike oral MTX, the systemic exposure of SC MTX did not plateau over the doses studied, particularly at doses ≥15 mg/week. In this study, higher systemic MTX exposure was not associated with increases in AEs. Patients with an inadequate clinical response to oral MTX may benefit from higher drug exposure by switching to SC MTX.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01618968.

摘要

目的

比较类风湿关节炎(RA)患者口服甲氨蝶呤(MTX)与皮下(SC)MTX 经自动注射器(MTXAI)给药的相对生物利用度、安全性和耐受性。

方法

在这项随机、多中心、开放标签、三交叉研究中,纳入正在接受 MTX 治疗至少 3 个月的年龄≥18 岁的成人 RA 患者,按照三种治疗方法(口服、腹部 SC 和大腿 SC)的随机顺序接受每周 10、15、20 和 25mg 的 MTX 治疗。在每种治疗后 24 小时内采集血样进行药代动力学分析,并评估注射部位。

结果

47 例患者完成了这项研究。口服 MTX 的全身暴露在剂量≥15mg/周时达到平台期。相比之下,SC MTX 的全身暴露呈线性增加,在每个剂量下均大于口服 MTX。两种制剂均未出现预期的不良事件。

结论

与口服 MTX 不同,SC MTX 的全身暴露在研究剂量范围内没有达到平台期,尤其是在剂量≥15mg/周时。在这项研究中,更高的全身 MTX 暴露与不良事件的增加无关。对于口服 MTX 治疗反应不足的患者,通过转换为 SC MTX 可能会受益于更高的药物暴露。

试验注册号

NCT01618968。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aec/4112421/ba3c9399e335/annrheumdis-2014-205228f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验