Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 31;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01169-y.
Research indicate that when general practitioners (GPs) refer their patients for specialist care, the patient often has long distance. This study had a twofold aim: in accordance to the GP's suspicion of cancer, we investigated the association between: 1) cancer patient's travel distance to the first specialised diagnostic facility and the GP's diagnostic strategy and 2) cancer patient's travel distance to the first specialised diagnostic facility and satisfaction with the waiting time and the availability of diagnostic investigations.
This combined questionnaire- and registry-based study included incident cancer patients diagnosed in the last 6 months of 2016 where the GP had been involved in the diagnostic process of the patients prior to their diagnosis of cancer (n = 3455). The patient's travel distance to the first specialised diagnostic facility was calculated by ArcGIS Network Analyst. The diagnostic strategy, cancer suspicion and the GP's satisfaction with the waiting times and the available investigations were assessed from GP questionnaires.
When the GP did not suspect cancer or serious illness, an insignificant tendency was seen that longer travel distance to the first specialised diagnostic facility increased the likelihood of the GP using 'wait-and-see' approach and 'medical treatment' as diagnostic strategies. The GPs of patients with travel distance longer than 49 km to the first specialised diagnostic facility were more likely to report dissatisfaction with the waiting time for requested diagnostic investigations (PR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.20-3.28).
A insignificant tendency to use 'wait-and-see' and 'medical treatment' were seen among GPs of patients with long travel distance to the first diagnostic facility when the GP did not suspect cancer or serious illness. Long distance was associated with higher probability of GP dissatisfaction with the waiting time for diagnostic investigations.
研究表明,当全科医生(GP)将患者转介到专科医生进行治疗时,患者往往需要长途跋涉。本研究有两个目的:根据 GP 对癌症的怀疑,我们调查了以下两者之间的关联:1)癌症患者到第一家专业诊断机构的旅行距离与 GP 的诊断策略之间的关联,以及 2)癌症患者到第一家专业诊断机构的旅行距离与对等待时间和诊断检查可用性的满意度之间的关联。
这项结合了问卷调查和基于登记的研究包括在 2016 年最后 6 个月内确诊的癌症患者,这些患者在被诊断为癌症之前,其 GP 已参与了诊断过程(n=3455)。通过 ArcGIS Network Analyst 计算患者到第一家专业诊断机构的旅行距离。通过 GP 问卷评估诊断策略、癌症怀疑以及 GP 对等待时间和可用检查的满意度。
当 GP 不怀疑癌症或严重疾病时,观察到一种无显著意义的趋势,即到第一家专业诊断机构的旅行距离越长,GP 更有可能采用“等待观察”和“医疗治疗”作为诊断策略的可能性越大。到第一家专业诊断机构的旅行距离超过 49 公里的患者的 GP 更有可能报告对请求的诊断检查的等待时间不满意(PR:1.98,95%CI:1.20-3.28)。
当 GP 不怀疑癌症或严重疾病时,对于到第一家诊断机构的旅行距离较长的患者,GP 采用“等待观察”和“医疗治疗”的趋势并不明显。长途跋涉与 GP 对诊断检查等待时间不满的可能性增加有关。