• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线前列腺癌患者同伴支持:系统评价。

Online peer-to-peer support for persons affected by prostate cancer: A systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Psychooncology, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatic, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Urology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2107-2115. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.009
PMID:32475711
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about online peer-to-peer support for persons affected by prostate cancer (PC) and its potential effects.

METHODS

Our systematic review of the literature followed the PRISMA statement and revealed a total of 2372 records. Finally, 24 studies about online peer-to-peer support for persons affected by PC were selected for qualitative synthesis. Due to a lack of suitable quantitative results, the intended meta-analysis was not possible.

RESULTS

Available studies were almost exclusively descriptive. Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 40 PC survivors. In this study, quality of life improved in online support group (OSG) users and decreased in the control group. However, it returned to baseline in both groups after eight weeks. As a summary across all studies, OSGs play a significant role in patients' treatment decision-making and for the social environment of PC patients. Information exchange in OSGs was predominant, but emotional and supportive content also had an important function.

CONCLUSION

Due to the inconsistent methodology and the lack of reporting standards, a synthesis from the available studies is very limited.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Population-based studies should focus on the actual use of OSGs. The effectiveness of OSGs needs to be investigated in RCTs.

摘要

目的

关于前列腺癌(PC)患者的在线同伴支持及其潜在影响,人们知之甚少。

方法

我们对文献的系统回顾遵循 PRISMA 声明,共显示了 2372 条记录。最后,选择了 24 项关于受 PC 影响的人的在线同伴支持的研究进行定性综合。由于缺乏合适的定量结果,因此无法进行预期的荟萃分析。

结果

现有研究几乎都是描述性的。只有一项随机对照试验(RCT)纳入了 40 名 PC 幸存者。在这项研究中,在线支持小组(OSG)用户的生活质量提高,而对照组则下降。然而,在八周后,两组都恢复到基线水平。综合所有研究,OSG 在患者的治疗决策和 PC 患者的社会环境中发挥着重要作用。OSG 中的信息交流占主导地位,但情感和支持内容也具有重要功能。

结论

由于方法不一致且缺乏报告标准,因此对现有研究的综合非常有限。

实践意义

基于人群的研究应侧重于 OSG 的实际使用。需要在 RCT 中研究 OSG 的有效性。

相似文献

1
Online peer-to-peer support for persons affected by prostate cancer: A systematic review.在线前列腺癌患者同伴支持:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2107-2115. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 12.
2
Design, Delivery, Maintenance, and Outcomes of Peer-to-Peer Online Support Groups for People With Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders: Systematic Review.慢性肌肉骨骼疾病患者点对点在线支持小组的设计、实施、维护及效果:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 24;22(4):e15822. doi: 10.2196/15822.
3
The effect of an online support group on patients׳ treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer: An online survey.在线支持小组对局限性前列腺癌患者治疗决策的影响:一项在线调查。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Feb;35(2):37.e19-37.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
4
Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study.面对面与在线前列腺癌同伴支持小组:一项横断面比较研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Feb;12(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0633-0. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer.一项针对有前列腺癌病史的男性的在线支持性护理干预措施的可行性、可接受性和疗效的系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Feb;13(1):75-96. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
6
A scoping review of the characteristics and benefits of online prostate cancer communities.在线前列腺癌社区的特征和益处的范围综述。
Psychooncology. 2021 May;30(5):659-668. doi: 10.1002/pon.5618. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
7
Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients.在线支持群组中的社交网络:在线社交网络如何使患者受益。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(6):639-59. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.757396. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
8
Benefits and challenges experienced by professional facilitators of online support groups for cancer survivors.癌症幸存者在线支持小组专业促进者所经历的益处与挑战。
Psychooncology. 2009 Feb;18(2):144-55. doi: 10.1002/pon.1374.
9
Online support groups for head and neck cancer and health-related quality of life.头颈癌在线支持小组与健康相关生活质量
Qual Life Res. 2017 Sep;26(9):2351-2362. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1575-8. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
10
Personality, Attitudes, and Behaviors Predicting Perceived Benefit in Online Support Groups for Caregivers: Mixed Methods Study.预测在线照顾者支持小组中感知获益的人格、态度和行为:混合方法研究
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Aug 18;5(1):e36167. doi: 10.2196/36167.

引用本文的文献

1
Urologists' Estimation of Online Support Group Utilization Behavior of Their Patients With Newly Diagnosed Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer in Germany: Predefined Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.德国泌尿科医生对新诊断为非转移性前列腺癌患者在线支持小组使用行为的评估:一项随机对照试验的预定义二次分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 7;27:e56092. doi: 10.2196/56092.
2
Qualitative studies on men with prostate cancer: a systematic meta-synthesis.关于前列腺癌男性患者的定性研究:一项系统的元综合分析。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2436720. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2436720. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
3
The effect of social care nurses on health related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: A non-randomized, multicenter, controlled trial.
社会护理护士对晚期癌症患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项非随机、多中心对照试验。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Dec;33(12):3387-3399. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03780-3. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
4
The Role of Social Media in the Experiences of COVID-19 Among Long-Hauler Women: Qualitative Study.社交媒体在新冠长期症状女性患者经历中的作用:定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 23;11:e50443. doi: 10.2196/50443.
5
Sexual experiences and information needs among patients with prostate cancer: a qualitative study.前列腺癌患者的性经历与信息需求:一项定性研究。
Sex Med. 2024 Apr 8;12(2):qfae019. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfae019. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Evaluating Somatic Experiencing to Heal Cancer Trauma: First Evidence with Breast Cancer Survivors.评估躯体经验疗法治疗癌症创伤:乳腺癌幸存者的初步证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;20(14):6412. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146412.
7
Experiences of using a supported digital intervention for cancer survivors in primary care: a qualitative process evaluation.在初级保健中使用支持性数字干预措施为癌症幸存者提供服务的经验:定性过程评估。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Feb;18(1):144-156. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01412-2. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Cancer survival stories: Perception, creation, and potential use case.癌症生存故事:感知、创造和潜在应用案例。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1551-1561. doi: 10.1111/hex.13760. Epub 2023 May 3.
9
An exploratory cross-sectional study of the effects of ongoing relationships with accompanying patients on cancer care experience, self-efficacy, and psychological distress.一项关于正在进行的陪伴患者关系对癌症护理体验、自我效能和心理困扰影响的探索性横断面研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Apr 22;23(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10856-9.
10
What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map.近期关于在健康和社会护理中使用同伴支持的有力证据的数量、多样性和性质是什么?一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 26;18(3):e1264. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1264. eCollection 2022 Sep.