Kumar Vijay, Rajan Shiv, Gupta Sameer, Akhtar Naseem, Sharma Sonali, Sinha Punnet, Misra Sanjeev, Chaturvedi Arun
1Department of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Oncology Office, 3rd Floor, Shatabdi Building Phase 2, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226003 India.
2Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab India.
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Jun;70(3):214-219. doi: 10.1007/s13224-019-01295-3. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
Differentiating malignancy from benign diseases is the key to successful management of adnexal masses. Risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA) has been used for this purpose. We have prospectively studied the diagnostic value of ROMA in patients presented with adnexal masses.
We prospective calculated ROMA values prior to surgery for adnexal masses. The risk calculated was then correlated with the histological findings, and results were analyzed according to menopausal status. ROMA cutoff value was determined using ROC curve, and sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated. Statistics were performed on SPSS software (version 20.0).
There were 94 patients with adnexal masses included in the study, 65 (69.1%) had epithelial ovarian cancer and 29 (30.9%) were diagnosed benign on histopathology. In both pre- and postmenopausal patients, ROMA values were significantly higher in patients with malignancy compared to those with benign disease (< 0.05). ROMA score was of a significant diagnostic value in both premenopausal (AUC = 0.914, = 10.81, < 0.001) and postmenopausal patients (AUC = 0.975, = 21.51, < 0.001). In premenopausal females, ROMA > 13.3% was able to discriminate malignant from benign patients with 97.06% sensitivity and 85.00% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were 91.7% and 94.4%. Similarly, in postmenopausal females, ROMA value of > 76% achieved 87.10% sensitivity and 100.00% specificity in discriminating malignant from benign patients with 100% positive and 69.2% negative predictive value. The overall accuracy of ROMA in pre- and postmenopausal patients was 87.0% and 85%, respectively.
ROMA is a useful and accurate test for differentiating epithelial ovarian cancer from benign ovarian masses. Further studies are needed to compare performance of ROMA with the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), CA 125 and HE4. Such comparative studies will be helpful to the clinician in deciding the best diagnostic tool for women with adnexal masses.
鉴别恶性肿瘤与良性疾病是附件包块成功管理的关键。恶性风险算法(ROMA)已用于此目的。我们前瞻性地研究了ROMA在附件包块患者中的诊断价值。
我们前瞻性地计算了附件包块手术前的ROMA值。然后将计算出的风险与组织学结果相关联,并根据绝经状态分析结果。使用ROC曲线确定ROMA临界值,并计算敏感性、特异性和预测值。在SPSS软件(版本20.0)上进行统计分析。
本研究纳入了94例附件包块患者,其中65例(69.1%)患有上皮性卵巢癌,29例(30.9%)经组织病理学诊断为良性。在绝经前和绝经后患者中,恶性肿瘤患者的ROMA值均显著高于良性疾病患者(<0.05)。ROMA评分在绝经前(AUC = 0.914,= 10.81,<0.001)和绝经后患者(AUC = 0.975,= 21.51,<0.001)中均具有显著的诊断价值。在绝经前女性中,ROMA>13.3%能够以97.06%的敏感性和85.00%的特异性区分恶性和良性患者。阳性和阴性预测值分别为91.7%和94.4%。同样,在绝经后女性中,ROMA值>76%在区分恶性和良性患者时达到了87.10%的敏感性和100.00%的特异性,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为69.2%。ROMA在绝经前和绝经后患者中的总体准确率分别为87.0%和85%。
ROMA是一种用于区分上皮性卵巢癌与良性卵巢包块的有用且准确的检测方法。需要进一步研究比较ROMA与恶性风险指数(RMI)、CA 125和HE4的性能。此类比较研究将有助于临床医生为附件包块女性确定最佳诊断工具。