Suppr超能文献

局限期小细胞肺癌标准分割放疗(>59 Gy)与超分割放疗(>45 Gy)联合同步化疗的长期疗效比较

Long-term outcome comparison for standard fractionation (>59 Gy) versus hyperfractionated (>45 Gy) radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Watkins John M, Russo J Kyle, Andresen Nicholas, Rountree Coyt R, Zahra Amir, Mott Sarah L, Herr Daniel J, O'Keefe Jacy, Allen Bryan G, Sharma Anand K, Buatti John M

机构信息

Bismarck Cancer Center, Bismarck, North Dakota, US.

Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, US.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Jul-Aug;25(4):489-493. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is commonly employed in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC); however, the optimal radiotherapy regimen is still unknown. This 3-institution analysis compares long-term disease control and survival outcomes for once- (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) radiotherapy at contemporary doses.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data were collected for LS-SCLC patients treated with platinum-based CCRT and planned RT doses of >5940 cGy at >180 cGy QD or >4500 cGy at 150 cGy BID. Comparative outcome analyses were performed for treatment groups.

RESULTS

From 2005 through 2014, 132 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis (80 QD, 52 BID). Treatment groups were well-balanced, excepting higher rate of advanced mediastinal staging, longer interval from biopsy to treatment initiation, and lower rate of prophylactic cranial irradiation for the QD group, as well as institutional practice variation. At median survivor follow-up of 33.5 months (range, 4.6-105.8), 80 patients experienced disease failure (44 QD, 36 BID), and 106 died (62 QD, 44 BID). No differences in disease control or survival were demonstrated between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis did not detect a difference in disease control or survival outcomes for contemporary dose QD versus BID CCRT in LS-SCLC.

摘要

背景

同步放化疗(CCRT)常用于局限期小细胞肺癌(LS-SCLC);然而,最佳放疗方案仍不明确。这项三机构分析比较了当代剂量下单次(QD)与每日两次(BID)放疗的长期疾病控制和生存结果。

方法和材料

收集接受铂类同步放化疗且计划放疗剂量>5940 cGy(QD剂量>180 cGy)或>4500 cGy(BID剂量150 cGy)的LS-SCLC患者的数据。对治疗组进行比较结果分析。

结果

2005年至2014年,132例患者符合纳入分析标准(80例QD,52例BID)。治疗组情况均衡,但QD组纵隔晚期分期率较高、活检至开始治疗的间隔时间较长、预防性颅脑照射率较低,以及存在机构实践差异。中位随访生存时间为33.5个月(范围4.6 - 105.8个月),80例患者出现疾病进展(44例QD,36例BID),106例死亡(62例QD,44例BID)。治疗组之间在疾病控制或生存方面未显示出差异。

结论

本分析未发现当代剂量的QD与BID同步放化疗在LS-SCLC的疾病控制或生存结果上存在差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Lung cancer. Radiotherapy in lung cancer: Actual methods and future trends.肺癌。肺癌的放射治疗:当前方法与未来趋势。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014 Jul 17;19(6):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.04.012. eCollection 2014 Nov.
8
Small-cell lung cancer.小细胞肺癌。
Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1741-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60165-7. Epub 2011 May 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验