• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一家儿科三级护理中心的海鲜分级口服食物激发试验结果

Seafood graded oral food challenge outcomes in a pediatric tertiary care center.

作者信息

Rubin Zachary E, Gu Hongjie, Polk Brooke I

机构信息

Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, USA.

Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, USA.

出版信息

World Allergy Organ J. 2020 May 13;13(5):100121. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100121. eCollection 2020 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100121
PMID:32477447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7248448/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are sparse data regarding the predictors of positive oral food challenges and reaction severity for seafood in children.

OBJECTIVE

Identify clinical characteristics in children with seafood allergy who were most likely to experience a negative oral food challenge (OFC).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for children who had a graded OFC to seafood at a pediatric tertiary care center from 2008 through 2019.

RESULTS

Sixty-three (60% male; average age 8 years; range 1-21 years) OFCs were performed, of which 21 were fish and 42 were shellfish. There were 10 (16%) positive OFCs and positive OFC rate was similar between fish (19%) and shellfish (14%). Forty-three children who underwent OFC had a reported history of IgE-mediated symptoms. Five of six children who had a history of anaphylaxis had a negative OFC. There was no difference in positive OFCs due to age, history of atopy, or initial allergic reaction history. The clinical characteristics of the positive OFCs were similar between fish and shellfish. A positive skin prick test to fish or shellfish did not increase the risk of a positive OFC. While the positive OFC rate did not differ for the shellfish food-specific IgE (FSIgE) level, there was a significant difference for fish (median <0.34 kU/L vs. 1.63 kU/L for pass and fail, respectively; P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

A retrospective study of OFCs to seafood showed that the rate of a positive OFC was low. While seafood allergy is thought to be rarely outgrown, children who have a low FsIgE and/or skin testing can successfully tolerate seafood.

摘要

背景

关于儿童海鲜口服食物激发试验阳性及反应严重程度的预测因素,相关数据稀少。

目的

确定最有可能口服食物激发试验(OFC)结果为阴性的海鲜过敏儿童的临床特征。

方法

对2008年至2019年在一家儿科三级护理中心接受分级海鲜OFC的儿童进行回顾性病历审查。

结果

共进行了63次OFC(60%为男性;平均年龄8岁;范围1至21岁),其中21次针对鱼类,42次针对贝类。有10次(16%)OFC结果为阳性,鱼类(19%)和贝类(14%)的阳性OFC率相似。43名接受OFC的儿童有IgE介导症状的报告病史。有过敏反应病史的6名儿童中有5名OFC结果为阴性。因年龄、特应性病史或初始过敏反应病史导致的阳性OFC无差异。鱼类和贝类阳性OFC的临床特征相似。对鱼类或贝类的皮肤点刺试验阳性并未增加阳性OFC的风险。虽然贝类食物特异性IgE(FSIgE)水平的阳性OFC率无差异,但鱼类有显著差异(通过和未通过的中位数分别为<0.34 kU/L和1.63 kU/L;P = 0.023)。

结论

一项关于海鲜OFC的回顾性研究表明,阳性OFC率较低。虽然海鲜过敏被认为很少自愈,但FSIgE水平低和/或皮肤试验的儿童能够成功耐受海鲜。

相似文献

1
Seafood graded oral food challenge outcomes in a pediatric tertiary care center.一家儿科三级护理中心的海鲜分级口服食物激发试验结果
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 May 13;13(5):100121. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100121. eCollection 2020 May.
2
Clinical and laboratory factors associated with negative oral food challenges.与口腔食物激发试验阴性相关的临床和实验室因素。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):467-73. doi: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3607.
3
Pediatric oral food challenges in the outpatient setting: A single-center experience.门诊环境下的儿科口服食物激发试验:单中心经验
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2023 Nov 8;3(1):100187. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100187. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Outcomes of oral food challenges in a real-world setting, with predictors of outcomes.真实环境下口服食物挑战的结果,及其结果的预测因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Nov;131(5):655-660. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.07.005. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Is Oral Food Challenge (OFC) test safe for preschool children?口服食物激发试验(OFC)对学龄前儿童安全吗?
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2017 Dec;35(4):220-223. doi: 10.12932/AP0762.
6
Oral food challenge outcomes in children and adolescents in a tertiary centre: A 5-year experience.三级中心儿童和青少年口服食物挑战结果:5 年经验。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Jun;59(6):822-826. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16398. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
7
Review of 400 consecutive oral food challenges to almond.杏仁口服食物激发试验 400 例连续观察报告
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Feb;122(2):189-192. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
8
Predictors of a positive oral food challenge to cow's milk in children sensitized to cow's milk.牛奶过敏患儿口服牛奶激发试验阳性的预测因素。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2020 Nov-Dec;48(6):568-575. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 May 10.
9
Clinical and immunochemical profiles of food challenge proven or anaphylactic shrimp allergy in tropical Singapore.热带新加坡经食物激发试验证实或过敏反应性虾过敏的临床和免疫化学特征。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2015 Mar;45(3):687-97. doi: 10.1111/cea.12416.
10
The economic effect and outcome of delaying oral food challenges.延迟口服食物挑战的经济影响和结果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 May;116(5):420-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Shellfish Allergy Therapy: From Current Approaches to Future Strategies.贝类过敏治疗的进展:从当前方法到未来策略
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2025 Jul 16;68(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s12016-025-09077-8.
2
Diagnostic Decision Points of Specific Immunoglobulin E Concentrations for Seafood Allergies in Korean Children: A Nationwide Multicenter Study.韩国儿童海鲜过敏特异性免疫球蛋白E浓度的诊断决策点:一项全国多中心研究
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2025 Jan;17(1):127-134. doi: 10.4168/aair.2025.17.1.127.
3
Fish Allergenicity Modulation Using Tailored Enriched Diets-Where Are We?使用定制强化饮食调节鱼类致敏性——我们进展到哪一步了?
Front Physiol. 2022 May 25;13:897168. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.897168. eCollection 2022.
4
Assessment of egg and milk allergies among Indians by revalidating a food allergy predictive model.通过重新验证食物过敏预测模型评估印度人群中的鸡蛋和牛奶过敏情况。
World Allergy Organ J. 2022 Mar 24;15(3):100639. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100639. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
IgE-Mediated Fish Allergy in Children.儿童 IgE 介导的鱼类过敏。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 18;57(1):76. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010076.

本文引用的文献

1
Natural resolution of non-anaphylactic shrimp allergy in patients diagnosed 10 years earlier by oral food challenge.通过口服食物激发试验确诊10年前的患者非过敏性虾类过敏的自然缓解。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2021 Dec;39(4):249-257. doi: 10.12932/AP-080119-0470.
2
Analysis of Oral Food Challenge Outcomes in IgE-Mediated Food Allergies to Almond in a Large Cohort.大规模队列中杏仁 IgE 介导食物过敏的口服食物挑战结果分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2359-2368.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.03.049. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
3
Analysis of a Large Standardized Food Challenge Data Set to Determine Predictors of Positive Outcome Across Multiple Allergens.分析大型标准化食物挑战数据集,以确定多种过敏原阳性结果的预测因素。
Front Immunol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2689. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02689. eCollection 2018.
4
Seafood Consumption in the United States, 2013-2016.2013 - 2016年美国的海鲜消费情况
NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Sep(321):1-8.
5
Low resolution rates of seafood allergy.海鲜过敏的低确诊率。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Feb;7(2):690-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
6
Oral food challenge outcomes in a pediatric tertiary care center.一家儿科三级护理中心的口服食物激发试验结果
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2017 Sep 22;13:43. doi: 10.1186/s13223-017-0215-8. eCollection 2017.
7
Characteristics of tree nut challenges in tree nut allergic and tree nut sensitized individuals.坚果过敏和坚果致敏个体中坚果激发试验的特征。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 May;118(5):591-596.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
Prevalence of fish and shellfish allergy: A systematic review.鱼类和贝类过敏的流行情况:系统评价。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Sep;117(3):264-272.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.07.015.
9
Rate of food introduction after a negative oral food challenge in the pediatric population.儿科人群口服食物激发试验结果为阴性后的食物引入率。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Mar-Apr;5(2):475-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
Risk factors in pediatric shrimp allergy.小儿虾过敏的风险因素。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):65-71. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3852.