• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三级中心儿童和青少年口服食物挑战结果:5 年经验。

Oral food challenge outcomes in children and adolescents in a tertiary centre: A 5-year experience.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Jun;59(6):822-826. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16398. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1111/jpc.16398
PMID:37013273
Abstract

AIM

Oral food challenges (OFC) are an important tool in the assessment of food allergy. We sought to identify factors available at initial assessment visit which were associated with successful outcome or challenge failure in Australian children.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all paediatric patients who underwent OFC in our allergy service over a 5-year period. Clinical data comprising patient demographics, co-morbidities, skin prick test (SPT) results, nature of previous reactions, elapsed time since previous reactions and outcome at OFC were recorded.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fifty-six OFCs were conducted, with 56 cases (12.3%) resulting in a reaction. Likelihood of reaction at OFC was significantly increased for patients with atopic dermatitis (odds ratio 1.99). When stratified by food substance, atopic dermatitis had the strongest association with reaction within the peanut group (odds ratio 3.2), and no association was demonstrated for soy or prawn. Increasing SPT wheal size (P < 0.001) and previous history of anaphylaxis to the challenge food (P < 0.001) correlated with failure at OFC. A low-risk group was identified, of patients with no clear history of prior reaction to the challenge food, and SPT result <3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors identified at assessment visit which correlated with reaction at OFC are atopic dermatitis, prior history of anaphylaxis, and increasing SPT wheal size. Domiciliary OFC could be considered in a select low-risk group of patients undergoing food challenge. This study was performed at a single centre with limited sample size, further large-scale and multicentre study verification of our data will provide more accurate representation of the Australian demographic.

摘要

目的

口服食物挑战(OFC)是评估食物过敏的重要工具。我们旨在确定初始评估时可获得的因素,这些因素与澳大利亚儿童的成功结果或挑战失败相关。

方法

我们对过敏科进行 OFC 的所有儿科患者进行了回顾性研究,时间为 5 年。记录了临床数据,包括患者人口统计学、合并症、皮肤点刺试验(SPT)结果、既往反应的性质、既往反应后时间以及 OFC 的结果。

结果

共进行了 456 次 OFC,其中 56 例(12.3%)出现反应。OFC 发生反应的可能性在特应性皮炎患者中显著增加(优势比 1.99)。按食物物质分层时,特应性皮炎与花生组反应之间的相关性最强(比值比 3.2),而与大豆或虾无相关性。SPT 风团大小增加(P<0.001)和对挑战食物有过敏反应的既往史(P<0.001)与 OFC 失败相关。确定了一个低风险组,即患者对挑战食物无明确既往反应史,且 SPT 结果<3mm。

结论

评估时确定的与 OFC 反应相关的因素包括特应性皮炎、既往过敏反应史和 SPT 风团大小增加。可以考虑在进行食物挑战的选择低风险组患者中进行家庭 OFC。本研究在单中心进行,样本量有限,进一步的大规模多中心研究验证我们的数据将更准确地反映澳大利亚人群。

相似文献

1
Oral food challenge outcomes in children and adolescents in a tertiary centre: A 5-year experience.三级中心儿童和青少年口服食物挑战结果:5 年经验。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Jun;59(6):822-826. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16398. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
Skin prick test responses and allergen-specific IgE levels as predictors of peanut, egg, and sesame allergy in infants.皮肤点刺试验反应和过敏原特异性 IgE 水平可预测婴儿花生、鸡蛋和芝麻过敏。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Oct;132(4):874-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
3
Predictive values for food challenge-induced severe reactions: development of a simple food challenge score.食物激发试验诱发严重反应的预测值:一种简单食物激发试验评分的制定
Isr Med Assoc J. 2012 Jan;14(1):24-8.
4
Atopy patch test in the diagnosis of food allergy in children with atopic eczema dermatitis syndrome.特应性皮炎综合征患儿食物过敏诊断中的斑贴试验
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 2005;50:261-7.
5
Comparison of Diagnostic Tests with Oral Food Challenge in a Clinical Trial for Adult Patients with Sesame Anaphylaxis.在一项针对芝麻过敏成年患者的临床试验中,诊断测试与口服食物激发试验的比较。
Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Feb 1;19(1):27-34. doi: 10.18502/ijaai.v19i1.2415.
6
Cow's milk allergy (CMA) in children: identification of allergologic tests predictive of food allergy.儿童牛奶过敏(CMA):预测食物过敏的变应性检测方法的鉴定
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 May;46(3):100-5.
7
Analysis of a Large Standardized Food Challenge Data Set to Determine Predictors of Positive Outcome Across Multiple Allergens.分析大型标准化食物挑战数据集,以确定多种过敏原阳性结果的预测因素。
Front Immunol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2689. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02689. eCollection 2018.
8
Review of 400 consecutive oral food challenges to almond.杏仁口服食物激发试验 400 例连续观察报告
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Feb;122(2):189-192. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
9
Comparison of diagnostic tests for suspected cow's milk allergy in children with atopic dermatitis.疑似特应性皮炎儿童牛奶过敏的诊断检测比较。
Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2022 Jun;74(3):318-324. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.16.04424-8. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
10
Evaluation of food allergy in patients with atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎患者食物过敏的评估。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 Jan;1(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Asthma and Multi-Food Allergy Are Risk Factors for Oral Food Challenge Failure-A Single-Center Experience.哮喘和多种食物过敏是口服食物激发试验失败的危险因素——单中心经验
Nutrients. 2025 Aug 27;17(17):2769. doi: 10.3390/nu17172769.