• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为昂贵的医疗技术的价值付费:应用基于价值的支付改革的框架。

Paying For Value From Costly Medical Technologies: A Framework For Applying Value-Based Payment Reforms.

作者信息

Lopez Marianne Hamilton, Daniel Gregory W, Fiore Nicholas C, Higgins Aparna, McClellan Mark B

机构信息

Marianne Hamilton Lopez is research director for value-based payment reform at the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, in Washington, D.C.

Gregory W. Daniel is head, U.S. Healthcare Policy, at Edwards Lifesciences in Washington, D.C. He was the deputy director of the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy and a clinical professor at the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, in Durham, North Carolina, when this work was performed.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):1018-1025. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00771.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00771
PMID:32479217
Abstract

Innovative medical products offer significant and potentially transformative impacts on health, but they create concerns about rising spending and whether this rise is translating into higher value. The result is increasing pressure to pay for therapies in a way that is tied to their value to stakeholders through improving outcomes, reducing disease complications, and addressing concerns about affordability. Policy responses include the growing application of health technology assessments based on available evidence to determine unit prices, as well as alternatives to volume-based payment that adjust product payments based on predictors or measures of value. Building on existing frameworks for value-based payment for health care providers, we developed an analogous framework for medical products, including drugs, devices, and diagnostic tools. We illustrate each of these types of alternative payment mechanisms and describe the conditions under which each may be useful. We discuss how the use of this framework can help track reforms, improve evidence, and advance policy analysis involving medical product payment.

摘要

创新型医疗产品对健康具有重大且可能具有变革性的影响,但它们引发了人们对支出不断增加以及这种增长是否转化为更高价值的担忧。结果是,通过改善治疗效果、减少疾病并发症以及解决可负担性问题,以与产品对利益相关者的价值挂钩的方式支付治疗费用的压力越来越大。政策应对措施包括越来越多地应用基于现有证据的卫生技术评估来确定单价,以及基于价值的支付替代方案,即根据价值预测指标或衡量标准调整产品支付。在现有的医疗保健提供者基于价值的支付框架基础上,我们为医疗产品(包括药品、器械和诊断工具)开发了一个类似的框架。我们阐述了每种类型的替代支付机制,并描述了每种机制可能有用的条件。我们讨论了使用该框架如何有助于跟踪改革、改进证据以及推进涉及医疗产品支付的政策分析。

相似文献

1
Paying For Value From Costly Medical Technologies: A Framework For Applying Value-Based Payment Reforms.为昂贵的医疗技术的价值付费:应用基于价值的支付改革的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):1018-1025. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00771.
2
US hospital payment adjustments for innovative technology lag behind those in Germany, France, and Japan.美国医院对创新技术的支付调整落后于德国、法国和日本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):261-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1017.
3
What "Value" Should We Pay For? A Path Toward Value-Based Payment in Canadian Healthcare Systems.我们应该为“价值”支付什么?加拿大医疗保健系统中基于价值的支付之路。
Healthc Pap. 2019 Oct;18(3):29-40. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2019.25928.
4
States Encouraging Value-Based Payment: Lessons From CMS's State Innovation Models Initiative.鼓励基于价值的支付的州:CMS 的州创新模式倡议的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):506-542. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12380. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
5
Health Care Efficiencies: Consolidation and Alternative Models vs. Health Care and Antitrust Regulation - Irreconcilable Differences?医疗保健效率:合并与替代模式与医疗保健及反垄断监管——不可调和的差异?
Am J Law Med. 2017 Nov;43(4):426-467. doi: 10.1177/0098858817753407.
6
Design and impact of bundled payment for detox and follow-up care.捆绑支付在戒毒和随访护理中的设计和影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Nov;82:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
7
Medical Education and Health Care Delivery: A Call to Better Align Goals and Purposes.医学教育与医疗保健服务提供:呼吁更好地调整目标和宗旨。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):384-390. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001921.
8
The 8 basic payment methods in health care.医疗保健的 8 种基本支付方式。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Aug 18;163(4):300-6. doi: 10.7326/M14-2784.
9
Advancing Value-Based Models for Heart Failure: A Call to Action From the Value in Healthcare Initiative's Value-Based Models Learning Collaborative.推进心力衰竭的基于价值的模型:医疗保健价值倡议的基于价值的模型学习协作组织的行动呼吁。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 May;13(5):e006483. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006483. Epub 2020 May 12.
10
Transforming Medicare's Payment Systems: Progress Shaped By The ACA.转变医疗保险支付系统:《平价医疗法案》推动的进展
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Mar;39(3):413-420. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01410.

引用本文的文献

1
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy as first-line therapy for cervical cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the US.阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗及化疗作为宫颈癌一线治疗方案:美国的成本效益分析
Front Immunol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1481584. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1481584. eCollection 2024.
2
Design and Features of Pricing and Payment Schemes for Health Technologies: A Scoping Review and a Proposal for a Flexible Need-Driven Classification.医疗技术定价与支付方案的设计及特点:一项范围综述与灵活的需求驱动分类建议
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jan;43(1):5-29. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01435-2. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
3
Experiences and Interest in Value-Based Payment Arrangements for Medical Products Among Medicaid Agencies: An Exploratory Analysis.
医疗产品基于价值的支付安排在医疗补助机构中的经验和兴趣:探索性分析。
Milbank Q. 2024 Sep;102(3):713-731. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12703. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
A Policy Approach to Reducing Low-Value Device-Based Procedure Use.一种降低低值器械为基础的治疗方法使用率的政策方法。
Milbank Q. 2022 Dec;100(4):1006-1027. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12595. Epub 2022 Dec 27.