• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转变医疗保险支付系统:《平价医疗法案》推动的进展

Transforming Medicare's Payment Systems: Progress Shaped By The ACA.

作者信息

Chernew Michael E, Conway Patrick H, Frakt Austin B

机构信息

Michael E. Chernew ( Chernew@hcp. med. harvard. edu ) is the Leonard D. Schaeffer Professor of Health Care Policy and director of the Healthcare Markets and Regulation Lab in the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, in Boston, Massachusetts.

Patrick H. Conway was the president and CEO of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, in Durham, when this work was performed.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Mar;39(3):413-420. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01410.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01410
PMID:32119623
Abstract

The Affordable Care Act promoted payment reforms directly and through the creation of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, which it endowed with the authority to introduce Alternative Payment Models (APMs) into Medicare and Medicaid. We conducted a narrative review of these payment reforms, finding that several programs generated modest savings while maintaining or improving the quality of care, but they had high dropout rates. In general, evidence for other APMs is less conclusive, and whether the reforms spurred similar changes in the private sector remains anecdotal. Despite challenges, APMs provide incentives for efficient care provision and offer providers a way to succeed financially in an environment with slowly rising fee-for-service prices. Thus, we consider the Affordable Care Act's payment reforms to be modestly successful, and we encourage both the purging of initiatives that aren't working and the continued development and study of promising ones.

摘要

《平价医疗法案》直接并通过设立医疗保险和医疗补助创新中心推动了支付改革,该中心被赋予将替代支付模式(APMs)引入医疗保险和医疗补助的权力。我们对这些支付改革进行了叙述性综述,发现几个项目在维持或改善医疗质量的同时实现了适度的成本节约,但它们的退出率很高。总体而言,其他替代支付模式的证据不太确凿,这些改革是否在私营部门引发了类似变化仍只是传闻。尽管存在挑战,但替代支付模式为高效提供医疗服务提供了激励措施,并为提供者提供了一种在按服务收费价格缓慢上涨的环境中实现财务成功的途径。因此,我们认为《平价医疗法案》的支付改革取得了一定成功,我们鼓励摒弃不起作用的举措,并继续开发和研究有前景的举措。

相似文献

1
Transforming Medicare's Payment Systems: Progress Shaped By The ACA.转变医疗保险支付系统:《平价医疗法案》推动的进展
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Mar;39(3):413-420. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01410.
2
The Economics of Provider Payment Reform: Are Accountable Care Organizations the Answer?医疗服务提供者支付改革的经济学: accountable care organizations 是答案吗? (注:Accountable Care Organizations 一般译为“ accountable care organizations”,可简称为“ accountable care organizations”,直译为“ accountable care organizations”,意译为“ accountable care organizations”,具体可根据上下文调整,这里暂保留英文未翻译)
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Aug;40(4):745-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3150038. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
3
Fee-for-service will remain a feature of major payment reforms, requiring more changes in Medicare physician payment.按服务项目付费仍将是主要支付改革的一个特点,这需要对医疗保险医生支付进行更多的改革。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Sep;31(9):1977-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0350.
4
When Should Medicare Mandate Participation In Alternative Payment Models?医疗保险应在何时强制要求参与替代支付模式?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Feb;39(2):305-309. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00570.
5
Medicare Payment Reform: Aligning Incentives for Better Care.医疗保险支付改革:调整激励措施以提供更好的医疗服务。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Jun;20:1-12.
6
Strengthening the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation's Approach to Constructing Alternative Payment Models.加强医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心构建替代支付模式的方法。
Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):11-25. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12597. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
7
Evaluation of US Hospital Episode Spending for Acute Inpatient Conditions After the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后对美国急性住院患者病种的医院住院费用评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2023926. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23926.
8
Alternative payment models and urology.替代支付模式与泌尿外科
Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Jul;27(4):360-365. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000403.
9
Future considerations for clinical dermatology in the setting of 21st century American policy reform: Accountable Care Organizations.21 世纪美国政策改革背景下临床皮肤科的未来思考:责任医疗组织。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jan;76(1):170-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.07.063. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
10
Assessment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Increase in Fees for Primary Care and Access to Care for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries.评估《患者保护与平价医疗法案》对双重保险受益人的初级保健费用和获得医疗服务的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033424. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33424.

引用本文的文献

1
The Next Generation of Payment Reforms for Population Health - An Actionable Agenda for 2035 Informed by Past Gains and Ongoing Lessons.支付改革推动人群健康的新纪元——2035 年行动计划,基于既往成就与持续经验教训
Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):866-892. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12632.
2
Trends in and Factors Contributing to the Slowdown in Medicare Spending Growth, 2007-2018.2007-2018 年医疗保险支出增长放缓的趋势及影响因素
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Dec 2;3(12):e224475. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4475.
3
Obamacare: A bibliometric perspective.
奥巴马医改:文献计量学视角。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;10:979064. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.979064. eCollection 2022.
4
Physician Compensation Arrangements and Financial Performance Incentives in US Health Systems.美国卫生系统中的医师薪酬安排和财务绩效激励。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jan 28;3(1):e214634. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4634. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Factors Associated With Overuse of Health Care Within US Health Systems: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Medicare Beneficiaries From 2016 to 2018.与美国医疗体系过度使用医疗保健相关的因素:对 2016 年至 2018 年 Medicare 受益人的横断面分析。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jan 14;3(1):e214543. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4543. eCollection 2022 Jan.
6
Integrated Health and Social Care in the United States: A Decade of Policy Progress.美国的综合健康与社会关怀:十年政策进展
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Oct 29;21(4):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5687. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
7
Affordable Care Act and Cancer Survivors' Financial Barriers to Care: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey, 2009-2018.平价医疗法案与癌症幸存者的医疗经济障碍:基于 2009-2018 年国家健康访谈调查的分析。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1603-e1613. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00095. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
8
Taking account of accountable care.考虑到责任医疗。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):573-577. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13689. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
9
Understanding how health systems facilitate primary care redesign.理解卫生系统如何促进基层医疗服务的重新设计。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1144-1154. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13576.
10
Excess Medical Care Spending: The Categories, Magnitude, and Opportunity Costs of Wasteful Spending in the United States.过度医疗支出:美国浪费性支出的类别、规模和机会成本。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1743-1748. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305865. Epub 2020 Oct 15.