Chen Song, Chen Zhen, Yang Bin, Xu Tao, Tu Xian-Kun
Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May 22;99(21):e20291. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020291.
Burr-hole craniostomy (BHC) is a widely accepted treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (CSDHs). This study adopted siphon irrigation to evacuate CSDHs and investigated its efficacy and safety as compared with the traditional irrigation used in BHC.A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a center between January 2017 and December 2018. The data of 171 patients who underwent burr-hole craniostomy for CSDH were collected and analyzed. A total of 68 patients underwent siphon irrigation (siphon group) and 103 patients were treated by a traditional method (control group). A follow-up was conducted 6 months after the surgery.No significant difference was observed in the baseline characteristics and preoperative computed tomography (CT) features of the 2 groups (P > .05). The postoperative CT features of the siphon group, which included the volume of hematoma evacuation (P = .034), hematoma evacuation rate (P < .001), recovery rate of the midline shift (P = .017), and occurrence of pneumocephalus (P = .037) were significantly different and better than those of the control group. The length of hospital stay after surgery of the siphon group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P = .015). The Markwalder score of the siphon group was significantly superior to that of the control group on postoperative day 1 (P = .006). Although the recurrence rate in the siphon group (2/68, 2.5%) was lower than that in the control group (11/103, 8.9%), no statistically significant difference was observed between them (P = .069). Moreover, no significant differences were observed in terms of complications and mortality rate between the 2 groups.There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the groups that underwent siphon irrigation and traditional irrigation. However, in comparison, siphon irrigation can better improve postoperative CT features, promote early recovery of neurological dysfunction after surgery, and shorten the length of hospital stay. This indicates that siphon irrigation may be a better therapeutic option in BHC for CSDH.
钻孔颅骨造口术(BHC)是治疗慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)广泛认可的方法。本研究采用虹吸冲洗法来清除CSDH,并与BHC中使用的传统冲洗法相比,研究其有效性和安全性。
2017年1月至2018年12月在一个中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究。收集并分析了171例行钻孔颅骨造口术治疗CSDH患者的数据。共68例患者接受虹吸冲洗(虹吸组),103例患者采用传统方法治疗(对照组)。术后6个月进行随访。
两组患者的基线特征和术前计算机断层扫描(CT)特征无显著差异(P>0.05)。虹吸组的术后CT特征,包括血肿清除量(P=0.034)、血肿清除率(P<0.001)、中线移位恢复率(P=0.017)和气颅发生率(P=0.037),与对照组相比有显著差异且更好。虹吸组术后住院时间明显短于对照组(P=0.015)。虹吸组术后第1天的Markwalder评分明显优于对照组(P=0.006)。虽然虹吸组的复发率(2/68,2.5%)低于对照组(11/103,8.9%),但两者之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异(P=0.069)。此外,两组在并发症和死亡率方面无显著差异。
接受虹吸冲洗和传统冲洗的组之间复发率无显著差异。然而,相比之下,虹吸冲洗可以更好地改善术后CT特征,促进术后神经功能障碍的早期恢复,并缩短住院时间。这表明虹吸冲洗可能是BHC治疗CSDH更好的治疗选择。