• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单骨孔引流术治疗慢性硬脑膜下血肿的硬膜下引流技术:双引流额枕位与单引流额位的比较。

Subdural drainage techniques for single burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: two drains frontal-occipital position versus one drain frontal position.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui, China.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;35(3):324-328. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1812520. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1080/02688697.2020.1812520
PMID:32870063
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Burr-hole craniostomy with a closed drainage system is the most commonly used technique for chronic subdural hematoma(CSDH), but the reoperation rate for hematoma recurrence is still high. This retrospective study aimed to compare the complications and recurrence of two subdural drains placement with tips frontal-occipital position (TFOP) versus one subdural drain placement with tip frontal position(OFP) following single burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma(CSDH).

METHODS

The authors analyzed data of all CSDH patients who underwent single burr-hole surgery with placement of subdural closed-drainage system(TFOP or OFP techniques) between January 2013 and December 2017. Data analysis included general patient data, complications, recurrence and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 331 patients were included(85 TFOP and 246 OFP). The TFOP group and OFP group were statistically comparable with respect to baseline characteristics except for preoperative Markwalder score ( = 0.019). Midline shift and subdural fluid thickness on first postoperative day were greater in OFP group than the TFOP group ( = 0.028; and  = 0.007, respectively). In addition, patients with OFP had a lower percent of hematoma change after surgery and much more residual subdural air than those with TFOP ( = 0.001; and  < 0.001, respectively). Postoperative complications and clinical outcome between the two groups showed no significant differences. During the 3-month follow-up, the rate of hematoma recurrence was significantly lower among patients treated with TFOP than those treated with OFP ( = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative complications rate did not differ between TFOP group and OFP group for patients with CSDH. Considering the lower rate of recurrence, TFOP following single burr-hole evacuation might be a safe and promising option for CSDH treatment.

摘要

目的

颅骨钻孔术联合闭式引流是治疗慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)最常用的方法,但血肿复发的再手术率仍然很高。本回顾性研究旨在比较两种不同的硬膜下引流方法在慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)单孔引流术后的并发症和复发率,即额顶位双管引流(TFOP)与额前位单管引流(OFP)。

方法

作者分析了 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间所有接受单孔颅骨钻孔术联合硬膜下闭式引流系统(TFOP 或 OFP 技术)治疗的 CSDH 患者的数据。数据分析包括一般患者数据、并发症、复发和临床结果。

结果

共纳入 331 例患者(85 例 TFOP 和 246 例 OFP)。TFOP 组和 OFP 组在基线特征方面除术前 Markwalder 评分外(=0.019),无统计学差异。OFP 组患者术后第 1 天的中线移位和硬膜下积液厚度大于 TFOP 组(=0.028;=0.007)。此外,OFP 组患者术后血肿变化百分比较低,硬膜下残余气体较多(=0.001;=0.000,分别)。两组患者术后并发症和临床结果无显著差异。在 3 个月的随访中,TFOP 组患者的血肿复发率明显低于 OFP 组(=0.039)。

结论

对于 CSDH 患者,TFOP 组和 OFP 组的术后并发症发生率无差异。考虑到复发率较低,TFOP 可能是治疗 CSDH 的一种安全且有前途的选择。

相似文献

1
Subdural drainage techniques for single burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: two drains frontal-occipital position versus one drain frontal position.单骨孔引流术治疗慢性硬脑膜下血肿的硬膜下引流技术:双引流额枕位与单引流额位的比较。
Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;35(3):324-328. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1812520. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
Transition of a Clinical Practice to Use of Subdural Drains after Burr Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: The Helsinki Experience.慢性硬脑膜下血肿颅骨钻孔引流术后使用硬膜下引流的临床实践转变:赫尔辛基经验。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e614-e626. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.230. Epub 2019 May 31.
3
Drain type after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma in geriatric patients: a subanalysis of the cSDH-Drain randomized controlled trial.老年慢性硬脑膜下血肿患者颅骨钻孔引流术后的引流类型:cSDH-Drain 随机对照试验的亚分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Oct;49(4):E6. doi: 10.3171/2020.7.FOCUS20489.
4
Does Drain Position and Duration Influence Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma? Lessons from a UK Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.引流位置和持续时间是否会影响慢性硬脑膜下血肿颅骨钻孔引流术患者的结局?来自英国多中心前瞻性队列研究的经验教训。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Oct 1;85(4):486-493. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy366.
5
Drains result in greater reduction of subdural width and midline shift in burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma.引流可导致慢性硬脑膜下血肿颅骨钻孔引流术后硬膜下宽度和中线移位的更大减少。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jun;162(6):1455-1466. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04356-z. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
6
Outcomes of Subdural Versus Subperiosteal Drain After Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.颅骨钻孔术后慢性硬脑膜下血肿引流中外膜下与硬脑膜下置管引流的结果:一项多中心队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e392-e401. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.168. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
Subperiosteal vs Subdural Drain After Burr-Hole Drainage of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial (cSDH-Drain-Trial).颅骨钻孔引流慢性硬脑膜下血肿后骨膜下与硬膜下引流的随机临床试验(cSDH-Drain-Trial)。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Nov 1;85(5):E825-E834. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz095.
8
Comparative analysis of safety and efficacy in subperiosteal versus subdural drainage after burr-hole trephination for chronic subdural hematoma.颅骨钻孔慢性硬膜下血肿术后骨膜下与硬膜下引流的安全性和疗效比较分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Jan;212:107068. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107068. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
9
Routine placement of subdural drain after burr hole evacuation of chronic and subacute subdural hematoma: a contrarian evidence based approach.慢性和亚急性硬膜下血肿钻孔引流术后常规放置硬膜下引流管:一种基于反向证据的方法
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jan;41(1):165-171. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0831-2. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
Subperiosteal versus Subdural Drain After Burr-hole Drainage Under Blood Thinners: A Subanalysis of the cSDH-Drain RCT.血液稀释剂治疗下钻孔引流术后骨膜下引流与硬膜下引流的比较:cSDH-Drain随机对照试验的亚组分析
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e113-e120. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.134. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and internal validation of a nomogram to predict temporary acute agitated delirium after surgery for chronic subdural hematoma in elderly patients: an analysis of the clinical database.预测老年慢性硬膜下血肿患者术后短暂急性激越性谵妄的列线图的开发与内部验证:临床数据库分析
Front Neurol. 2024 May 7;15:1394476. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1394476. eCollection 2024.
2
A Retrospective Study from a Single Center of 208 Patients with Unilateral Chronic Subdural Hematoma to Compare Outcomes Following Burr Hole Craniotomy and Hematoma Drainage Within 48 Hours and Between 48 Hours and 5 Days.一项单中心 208 例单侧慢性硬脑膜下血肿回顾性研究,比较颅骨钻孔引流术和血肿引流术在 48 小时内和 48 小时至 5 天内的疗效。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 May 22;28:e936774. doi: 10.12659/MSM.936774.