• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Financial Performance-An Empirical Analysis Based on China.促进还是抑制?环境规制对企业财务绩效的影响——基于中国的实证分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 28;17(11):3828. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113828.
2
Corporate environmental investment and sustainable development: based on the perspective of Marxist ecological civilization.企业环境投资与可持续发展:基于马克思主义生态文明观。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(38):89022-89035. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28508-7. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
Assessing the impact of green tax reforms on corporate environmental performance and economic growth: do green reforms promote the environmental performance in heavily polluted enterprises?评估绿色税收改革对企业环境绩效和经济增长的影响:绿色改革是否促进重污染企业的环境绩效?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(19):56054-56072. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26254-4. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
4
How do environmental protection expenditure and green technology innovation affect synergistically the financial performance of heavy polluting enterprises? Evidence from China.环保支出和绿色技术创新如何协同影响重污染企业的财务绩效?来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(59):89597-89613. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21908-1. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Impact of Environmental Tax on Corporate Sustainable Performance: Insights from High-Tech Firms in China.环境税对企业可持续绩效的影响:来自中国高科技企业的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;20(1):461. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010461.
6
Regional environmental supervision and corporate environmental investment: from the perspective of ecological damage compensation.区域环境监管与企业环境投资:基于生态损害赔偿的视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(19):28896-28912. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18468-1. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Internal Control Quality, Enterprise Environmental Protection Investment and Finance Performance: An Empirical Study of China's A-Share Heavy Pollution Industry.内部控制质量、企业环保投资与财务绩效——基于中国 A 股重污染行业的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;17(17):6082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176082.
8
The impact of the new environmental protection law on eco-innovation: evidence from green patent data of Chinese listed companies.新环保法对生态创新的影响:来自中国上市公司绿色专利数据的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(7):10047-10062. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16365-1. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
9
Corporate Environmental Performance in China: The Moderating Effects of the Media versus the Approach of Local Governments.中国企业的环境绩效:媒体与地方政府方式的调节作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 28;18(1):150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010150.
10
The effect of the new Environmental Protection Law on corporate financialization in China.新《环境保护法》对中国企业财务化的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(55):83596-83611. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21639-3. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of spatial prediction models from Machine Learning of cholangiocarcinoma incidence in Thailand.泰国胆管癌发病率机器学习空间预测模型的比较
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):2137. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23119-y.
2
ESG and corporate performance: The moderating role of government subsidies and mediating effect of analyst coverage in Chinese A-share listed companies.企业社会责任与公司绩效:政府补贴在中国A股上市公司中的调节作用以及分析师跟踪的中介效应
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0322190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322190. eCollection 2025.
3
Environmental taxes, technological innovation and firm performance: Evidence from China's manufacturing firms.环境税、技术创新与企业绩效:来自中国制造业企业的证据
Heliyon. 2024 May 15;10(10):e31386. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31386. eCollection 2024 May 30.
4
Does Environmental Regulation Promote the Infrastructure Investment Efficiency? Analysis Based on the Spatial Effects.环境规制是否促进基础设施投资效率?基于空间效应的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;20(4):2960. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042960.
5
Mediation Effect of Corporate Tax Burden and the Relationship between Environmental Regulation and Firm Performance.企业税负与环境规制对企业绩效关系的中介效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 14;19(22):14987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214987.
6
The Impact of Environmental and Social Responsibility on Customer Loyalty: A Multigroup Analysis among Generations X and Y.环境和社会责任对客户忠诚度的影响:X 世代和 Y 世代的多群组分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 5;17(18):6466. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186466.
7
Internal Control Quality, Enterprise Environmental Protection Investment and Finance Performance: An Empirical Study of China's A-Share Heavy Pollution Industry.内部控制质量、企业环保投资与财务绩效——基于中国 A 股重污染行业的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;17(17):6082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176082.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of environment pollution on the ocular surface.环境污染对眼表的影响。
Ocul Surf. 2018 Apr;16(2):198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
2
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C.《巴黎协定》气候提案需要进一步推动,才能将升温控制在 2°C 以下。
Nature. 2016 Jun 30;534(7609):631-9. doi: 10.1038/nature18307.
3
Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective.小企业的环境战略与绩效:基于资源的视角
J Environ Manage. 2008 Jan;86(1):88-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
4
Environmental management and firm performance: a case study.环境管理与企业绩效:一项案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2007 Sep;84(4):606-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.012. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
5
Air pollution and mortality in elderly people: a time-series study in Sao Paulo, Brazil.空气污染与老年人死亡率:巴西圣保罗的一项时间序列研究
Arch Environ Health. 1995 Mar-Apr;50(2):159-63. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1995.9940893.

促进还是抑制?环境规制对企业财务绩效的影响——基于中国的实证分析

Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Financial Performance-An Empirical Analysis Based on China.

机构信息

School of Economics, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Section 1 Yihuan Road, Chengdu 610065, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 28;17(11):3828. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113828.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17113828
PMID:32481632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7312506/
Abstract

Today, environmental protection has become a global issue, and various environmental regulations have been actively adopted. However, are these measures promoting or harming enterprise values? Is this effect the same for enterprises with different ownership backgrounds? In order to address these problems, we conducted an empirical analysis of China's A-share market to investigate the relationship between the New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) launched in China and corporate financial performance, and further explore the impact of environmental supervision intensity (ESI) from the perspective of ownership. The empirical results show that there is a negative correlation between NEPL and the financial performance of high pollution enterprises. Further analysis demonstrates that there is an inverted U-shape relationship between ESI and corporate financial performance for both state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs), while the financial performance of SOEs is more sensitive and tolerant to environmental regulation than that of non-SOEs. Finally, we make recommendations for the future direction of China's ecological civilization construction and sustainable development of enterprises based on three aspects: environmental awareness, policy considerations, and sustainable development. The innovation of this paper lies in putting NEPL and corporate financial performance in the same analytical framework for the first time, which enriches the research in this field. Meanwhile, it provides a new perspective for understanding the relationship between ESI and corporate financial performance through the analysis of nonlinearity and owner heterogeneity.

摘要

如今,环境保护已成为全球性议题,各国纷纷积极采取各项环境法规。然而,这些措施是促进了还是损害了企业价值?对于不同所有制背景的企业,这种效果是否相同?为了解决这些问题,我们针对中国 A 股市场进行了实证分析,研究了中国新《环境保护法》(NEPL)的推出与企业财务绩效之间的关系,并从所有制角度进一步探讨了环境监管强度(ESI)的影响。实证结果表明,NEPL 与高污染企业的财务绩效呈负相关。进一步的分析表明,对于国有企业(SOE)和非国有企业(non-SOE),ESI 与企业财务绩效之间均存在倒 U 型关系,而国有企业对环境监管的财务绩效更为敏感和耐受。最后,我们从环境意识、政策考虑和可持续发展三个方面,为中国生态文明建设和企业可持续发展的未来方向提出了建议。本文的创新之处在于首次将 NEPL 和企业财务绩效置于同一分析框架中,丰富了该领域的研究。同时,通过分析非线性和所有制异质性,为理解 ESI 与企业财务绩效之间的关系提供了新视角。