• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息可以解释动物集体行为中群体秩序的动态变化。

Information can explain the dynamics of group order in animal collective behaviour.

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 ITQ, UK.

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 1;11(1):2737. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16578-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-16578-x
PMID:32483141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7264142/
Abstract

Animal groups vary in their collective order (or state), forming disordered swarms to highly polarized groups. One explanation for this variation is that individuals face differential benefits or costs depending on the group's order, but empirical evidence for this is lacking. Here we show that in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), fish that are first to respond to an ephemeral food source do so faster when shoals are in a disordered, swarm-like state. This is because individuals' visual fields collectively cover more of their environment, meaning private information is more readily available in disordered groups. Once social information becomes available, however, the arrival times of subsequent group members to the food are faster in more ordered, polarized groups. Our data further suggest that first responding individuals (those that benefit from group disorder) maintain larger differences in heading angle to their nearest neighbours when shoaling, thereby explaining how conflict over whether private or social information is favoured can drive dynamic changes in collective behaviour.

摘要

动物群体的集体秩序(或状态)存在差异,从无序的蜂群到高度极化的群体都有。这种变化的一个解释是,个体根据群体的秩序面临不同的收益或成本,但缺乏这方面的经验证据。在这里,我们表明,在三刺鱼(Gasterosteus aculeatus)中,当鱼群处于无序的蜂群状态时,第一个对短暂食物源做出反应的鱼会更快地做出反应。这是因为个体的视野集体覆盖了更多的环境,这意味着无序群体中更容易获得私人信息。然而,一旦社会信息可用,随后群体成员到达食物的时间在更有序、极化的群体中更快。我们的数据还表明,首先做出反应的个体(那些从群体无序中受益的个体)在群体中保持更大的头部角度差异,从而解释了如何通过冲突来驱动群体行为的动态变化,即是优先考虑私人信息还是社会信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d07/7264142/046cf2a4ed47/41467_2020_16578_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d07/7264142/27495751d782/41467_2020_16578_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d07/7264142/1a6227d08264/41467_2020_16578_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d07/7264142/c95c082ea669/41467_2020_16578_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d07/7264142/046cf2a4ed47/41467_2020_16578_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d07/7264142/27495751d782/41467_2020_16578_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d07/7264142/1a6227d08264/41467_2020_16578_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d07/7264142/c95c082ea669/41467_2020_16578_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d07/7264142/046cf2a4ed47/41467_2020_16578_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Information can explain the dynamics of group order in animal collective behaviour.信息可以解释动物集体行为中群体秩序的动态变化。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 1;11(1):2737. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16578-x.
2
How perceived threat increases synchronization in collectively moving animal groups.感知威胁如何增加集体运动动物群体的同步性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 22;277(1697):3065-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0855. Epub 2010 May 26.
3
Nutritional state influences shoaling preference for familiars.营养状况会影响对熟悉个体的聚群偏好。
Zoology (Jena). 2007;110(5):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
4
Using Hidden Markov Models to characterise intermittent social behaviour in fish shoals.使用隐马尔可夫模型表征鱼群中的间歇性社会行为。
Naturwissenschaften. 2017 Dec 27;105(1-2):7. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1534-9.
5
UV matters in shoaling decisions.紫外线在鱼群聚集决策中起作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 7;273(1588):849-54. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3397.
6
Repeatable group differences in the collective behaviour of stickleback shoals across ecological contexts.在不同生态环境下,棘鱼鱼群的集体行为存在可重复的群体差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Feb 14;285(1872). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2629.
7
Evaluation of a non-invasive tagging system for laboratory studies using three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus.使用三刺棘鱼(Gasterosteus aculeatus)评估一种非侵入性标记系统在实验室研究中的应用。
J Fish Biol. 2009 Nov;75(7):1868-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02374.x.
8
Food intake rates of inactive fish are positively linked to boldness in three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus.在三刺鱼(Gasterosteus aculeatus)中,不活跃鱼类的食物摄取率与大胆程度呈正相关。
J Fish Biol. 2016 Apr;88(4):1661-8. doi: 10.1111/jfb.12934. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
9
A method for the automated long-term monitoring of three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus shoal dynamics.一种自动化长期监测三刺鱼群体动态的方法。
J Fish Biol. 2014 Apr;84(4):1228-33. doi: 10.1111/jfb.12332. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
10
Different behaviour-body length correlations in two populations of juvenile three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).两种三刺鱼幼鱼群体中不同的行为与体长相关性(三刺鱼学名:Gasterosteus aculeatus)
Behav Processes. 2016 Jan;122:75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality predicts collective behavior in greylag geese: Influencers are bold and followers are exploratory.个性预测灰雁的群体行为:有影响力者大胆,追随者爱探索。
iScience. 2025 Jul 22;28(8):113170. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113170. eCollection 2025 Aug 15.
2
Group personality, rather than acoustic noise, causes variation in group decision-making in guppy shoals.群体个性而非声学噪声导致孔雀鱼鱼群群体决策的差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18801. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03225-y.
3
Collective phases and long-term dynamics in a fish school model with burst-and-coast swimming.
具有爆发式和滑行式游泳的鱼群模型中的集体相位和长期动态
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 9;12(5):240885. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240885. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Predator Personality Variation, Not the Multiple Stressors of Temperature and Light, Determines Feeding Motivation in an Ambush Piscivore .食肉动物的个性差异,而非温度和光照等多种应激源,决定了伏击性食鱼动物的摄食动机。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):e70540. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70540. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Collective decision-making and spatial patterns in orientation of an endemic ungulate on the Tibetan Plateau.青藏高原特有有蹄类动物定向中的集体决策与空间模式
Curr Zool. 2023 Feb 8;70(1):45-58. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoad004. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Personality variation is eroded by simple social behaviours in collective foragers.简单的社会行为会使群体觅食者的个性差异逐渐消失。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Mar 2;19(3):e1010908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010908. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
A study of transfer of information in animal collectives using deep learning tools.使用深度学习工具研究动物群体中的信息传递。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 10;378(1874):20220073. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0073. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
8
Mechanisms of collective learning: how can animal groups improve collective performance when repeating a task?集体学习的机制:当动物群体重复一项任务时,它们如何提高集体表现?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 10;378(1874):20220060. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0060. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
9
A multi-scale review of the dynamics of collective behaviour: from rapid responses to ontogeny and evolution.多尺度综述:集体行为的动力学——从快速反应到个体发育和进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 10;378(1874):20220059. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0059. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
10
Small increases in group size improve small shoals' response to water flow in zebrafish.群体规模的小幅增加会改善斑马鱼小群体对水流的反应。
J Zool (1987). 2022 Apr;316(4):271-281. doi: 10.1111/jzo.12952. Epub 2021 Dec 28.