Rahmani Mehri, Rahimian Boogar Isaac, Talepasand Siavash, Nokani Mostafa
Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Mahdishahr, Semnan, Iran.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jan-Feb;11(1):99-110. doi: 10.32598/bcn.9.10.430. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of computer-based, manual-based, and combined cognitive rehabilitation to improve cognitive functions among patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS).
This was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test, and a 2-month follow-up, as well as a control group design. Sixty female patients with RRMS were selected by convenience sampling technique. Then they were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (computer-based, manual-based, and combined cognitive rehabilitation, each group including 12 patients), a placebo group (12 patients), and a control group (12 patients). The interventions were conducted in 21 sessions for the experimental groups for 5 months. The placebo group received physical rehabilitation intervention, and the control group received no intervention. The study participants were assessed by Psychiatric-Neurological Profile, Mini-Mental State Examination, Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale, Stroop Color and Word Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. The obtained data were analyzed by repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance in SPSS.
The effect of group factor was not significant (η=0.129), but the effect of time (η=0.884) and interaction effect of time and group (η=0.295) were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the effects of all three rehabilitation interventions (P>0.05). In the post-test totally and in Follow-up partially, all comparisons among three experimental groups with control and placebo groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).
Cognitive rehabilitation was effective in improving cognitive functions in patients with RRMS. Thus, these interventions are recommended for application, along with other treatment protocols to treat RRMS in clinical settings.
本研究旨在比较基于计算机的、基于手工的和综合认知康复疗法对复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者认知功能改善的效果。
这是一项采用前测-后测、2个月随访以及对照组设计的准实验研究。通过便利抽样技术选取了60名RRMS女性患者。然后将她们随机分为三个实验组(基于计算机的认知康复组、基于手工的认知康复组和综合认知康复组,每组12名患者)、一个安慰剂组(12名患者)和一个对照组(12名患者)。实验组进行为期5个月、共21次的干预。安慰剂组接受物理康复干预,对照组不接受任何干预。通过精神神经概况量表、简易精神状态检查表、库茨克扩展残疾状态量表、斯特鲁普颜色和文字测验、威斯康星卡片分类测验以及听觉连续加法测验对研究参与者进行评估。所获数据在SPSS中采用重复测量多元方差分析进行分析。
组间因素的效应不显著(η = 0.129),但时间效应(η = 0.884)以及时间与组间的交互效应(η = 0.295)具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。三种康复干预措施的效果之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。在末次测试时以及部分随访中,三个实验组与对照组和安慰剂组之间的所有比较均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
认知康复对改善RRMS患者的认知功能有效。因此,建议在临床环境中将这些干预措施与其他治疗方案一起应用于RRMS的治疗。