Suppr超能文献

多发性硬化症不同疾病进程中的认知损伤差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Distinct cognitive impairments in different disease courses of multiple sclerosis-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Germany.

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Germany; Department of Statistics, Faculty of Psychology, University of Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Dec;83:568-578. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

Abstract

Cognitive impairment (CI) is common and debilitating in patients with multiple sclerosis. However, little is known about how different disease courses affect CI, impeding prognosis and disease management. Here, we contrasted the magnitude and profile of CI measured with standardized neuropsychological tests in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) against relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) while considering potentially confounding demographic and clinical differences. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed finding 47 eligible studies (N=4460 patients). Effect-sizes for 12 cognitive domains were calculated as Hedges' g. Results indicated more severe CI overall (g=-0.37, p<.001) and in each single cognitive domain (g=-0.28 to -0.65, p<.001) in patients with PPMS despite comparable degrees of fatigue and depression. Moderator analyses revealed that these differences were not fully attributable to clinical heterogeneity between disease courses (e.g., age, disability). Particularly verbal learning and memory differentiated PPMS and RRMS independent from demographic differences. Results imply that, previously under-recognized, PPMS patients display severe degrees of CI and need more specialized disease management than RRMS patients.

摘要

认知障碍(CI)在多发性硬化症患者中很常见且使人虚弱。然而,对于不同的疾病进程如何影响 CI,从而阻碍预后和疾病管理,我们知之甚少。在这里,我们对比了原发性进展型多发性硬化症(PPMS)和复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者使用标准化神经心理学测试测量的 CI 的严重程度和特征,同时考虑了潜在的混杂人口统计学和临床差异。系统文献回顾和荟萃分析发现了 47 项符合条件的研究(N=4460 名患者)。计算了 12 个认知领域的效应大小作为 Hedges' g。结果表明,尽管疲劳和抑郁程度相当,但 PPMS 患者的 CI 总体上更为严重(g=-0.37,p<.001),且在每个单一认知领域中(g=-0.28 至-0.65,p<.001)更为严重。 调节分析表明,这些差异不能完全归因于疾病进程之间的临床异质性(例如年龄、残疾)。特别是言语学习和记忆能力可以将 PPMS 和 RRMS 区分开来,与人口统计学差异无关。研究结果表明,先前被低估的 PPMS 患者表现出严重程度的 CI,需要比 RRMS 患者更专门的疾病管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验