• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接支持专业人员的年度和早期离职预测因素:国家核心指标员工稳定性调查。

Predictors of Annual and Early Separations Among Direct Support Professionals: National Core Indicators Staff Stability Survey.

机构信息

James Houseworth, Sandra L. Pettingell, Julie E.D. Kramme, Renáta Tichá, and Amy S. Hewitt, University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.

出版信息

Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020 Jun 1;58(3):192-207. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-58.3.192.

DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-58.3.192
PMID:32484882
Abstract

Direct support professionals (DSPs) provide a broad range of supports in a variety of settings to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) that enables people to live, work, and participate in their communities. Despite the crucial importance in ensuring supports for community participation of people with IDD, high rates of annual turnover among DSPs in organizations that employ them have been documented for decades. This study utilizes National Core Indicators Staff Stability data from 2016 to examine the impact of organizational- and state-level factors related to DSP turnover, including annual DSP turnover and the percentage of DSPs who left their positions after less than 6 months. At the organizational level, a higher turnover rate in the last 12 months was significantly related to lower DSP wages and to not offering health insurance. At the state level, a higher turnover rate in the last 12 months was significantly related to a lower percentage of people living in individualized settings and lower per capita Medicaid spending. For early turnover at the organizational level, a higher percent of leavers within 6 months of tenure was significantly related to not offering paid time off and health insurance, higher vacancy rates, higher proportion of part-time DSPs, and lower overall staff sizes.

摘要

直接支持专业人员(DSP)在各种环境中为智力和发育障碍者(IDD)提供广泛的支持,使他们能够在社区中生活、工作和参与。尽管 DSP 在确保 IDD 者的社区参与方面至关重要,但几十年来,在雇用他们的组织中,DSP 的年离职率一直很高。本研究利用 2016 年国家核心指标员工稳定性数据,考察了与 DSP 离职相关的组织和州级因素的影响,包括年度 DSP 离职率和在不到 6 个月后离职的 DSP 百分比。在组织层面上,过去 12 个月中更高的离职率与 DSP 工资较低和不提供健康保险显著相关。在州一级,过去 12 个月中更高的离职率与生活在个性化环境中的人数比例较低以及人均医疗补助支出较低显著相关。在组织层面上的早期离职方面,在任期 6 个月内离职的员工比例较高与不提供带薪休假和健康保险、更高的空缺率、更多的兼职 DSP 以及更低的总体员工规模显著相关。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Annual and Early Separations Among Direct Support Professionals: National Core Indicators Staff Stability Survey.直接支持专业人员的年度和早期离职预测因素:国家核心指标员工稳定性调查。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020 Jun 1;58(3):192-207. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-58.3.192.
2
Incentives, Wages, and Retention Among Direct Support Professionals: National Core Indicators Staff Stability Survey.直接支持专业人员的激励措施、工资与留用情况:国家核心指标员工稳定性调查
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2022 Apr 1;60(2):113-127. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-60.2.113.
3
Direct Support Professionals and Quality of Life of People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.直接支持专业人员与智力和发育障碍人士的生活质量。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2018 Aug;56(4):234-250. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-56.5.234.
4
Direct support workforce supporting individuals with IDD: current wages, benefits, and stability.为智力和发育障碍人士提供支持的直接服务人员:当前工资、福利及稳定性。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Oct;52(5):317-29. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-52.5.317.
5
Competency-Based Training and Worker Turnover in Community Supports for People With IDD: Results From a Group Randomized Controlled Study.基于能力的培训与智障人士社区支持服务人员离职率:一项群组随机对照研究的结果。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 Jun;53(3):182-95. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-53.3.182.
6
Factors That Influence the Tenure of Direct Support Professionals in New York State Provider Agencies.影响纽约州服务提供商机构直接支持专业人员任期的因素。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2024 Feb 1;62(1):14-26. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-62.1.14.
7
Direct Support Professionals: Diversity, Disparities, and Deepening Crisis.直接支持专业人员:多样性、差异和日益加深的危机。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2024 Jun 1;62(3):174-185. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-62.3.174.
8
They Care for Others, But What About Themselves? Understanding Self-Care Among DSPs' and Its Relationship to Professional Quality of Life.他们关心他人,但他们自己呢?理解 DSP 中的自我保健及其与专业生活质量的关系。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020 Jun 1;58(3):221-240. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-58.3.221.
9
State Utilization of Direct Support Professionals in Medicaid HCBS Waivers.医疗补助家庭和社区基础服务豁免项目中直接支持专业人员的州利用情况
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019 Feb;57(1):1-13. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-57.1.1.
10
Introduction to the Special Issue: Understanding the Direct Support Workforce in the United States.特刊介绍:了解美国的直接支持人员。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020 Jun 1;58(3):189-191. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-58.3.189.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of COVID-19 on Direct Support Professionals and Frontline Supervisors Mental and Physical Health.新冠疫情对直接支持专业人员和一线主管身心健康的影响。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2025 Jun 1;63(3):244-255. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-63.3.244.
2
The Self-Perpetuating Turnover Cycle: Frontline Supervisors and Direct Support Professionals Reflect on Its Causes and Impacts.自我延续的周转循环:一线主管和直接支持专业人员对其成因及影响的反思
Inclusion (Wash). 2024;12(3):172-185. doi: 10.1352/2326-6988-12.3.172.
3
The state of employment in the United States among young adults with cerebral palsy.
美国脑瘫青年成年人的就业状况。
Health Care Transit. 2024 Nov 20;2:100083. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2024.100083. eCollection 2024.
4
Direct Support Professional and Frontline Supervisor Perspectives on Work-Life in a Pandemic.直接支持专业人员和一线主管对疫情期间工作与生活的看法。
Inclusion (Wash). 2022;10(4):314-326. doi: 10.1352/2326-6988-10.4.314.
5
Direct Support Professionals and COVID-19 Vaccination: A Comparison of Vaccinated Early Adopters and In-Betweeners.直接支持专业人员和 COVID-19 疫苗接种:早期接种者和中间接种者的比较。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2023 Dec 1;61(6):492-505. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-61.6.492.
6
The Direct Support Workforce: An Examination of Direct Support Professionals and Frontline Supervisors During COVID-19.直接支持人员:新冠疫情期间直接支持专业人员和一线主管的考察。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2023 Jun 1;61(3):197-210. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-61.3.197.
7
Current services and outcomes of formerly institutionalised and never-institutionalised US adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A propensity score matching analysis.曾被机构收容和从未被机构收容的美国成年智障和发育障碍者的现有服务和结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jul;36(4):859-870. doi: 10.1111/jar.13103. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
8
Direct Support Professionals and COVID-19 Vaccination: A Comparison of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Direct Support Professionals.直接支持专业人员和 COVID-19 疫苗接种:接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的直接支持专业人员的比较。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2023 Feb 1;61(1):1-15. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-61.1.1.
9
Community participation and staying home if you want: US adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.社区参与和居家意愿:美国有智力和发育障碍的成年人。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 Sep;35(5):1199-1207. doi: 10.1111/jar.13014. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
10
Incentives, Wages, and Retention Among Direct Support Professionals: National Core Indicators Staff Stability Survey.直接支持专业人员的激励措施、工资与留用情况:国家核心指标员工稳定性调查
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2022 Apr 1;60(2):113-127. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-60.2.113.