Suppr超能文献

评价 pan-Leishmania SL RNA qPCR 检测方法在实验室饲养和野外采集的白蛉和储存宿主中寄生虫检测的效果。

Evaluation of a pan-Leishmania SL RNA qPCR assay for parasite detection in laboratory-reared and field-collected sand flies and reservoir hosts.

机构信息

Evolutionary Ecology Group, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Laboratory of Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

出版信息

Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jun 1;13(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04141-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In eco-epidemiological studies, Leishmania detection in vectors and reservoirs is frequently accomplished by high-throughput and sensitive molecular methods that target minicircle kinetoplast DNA (kDNA). A pan-Leishmania SYBR green quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay which detects the conserved spliced-leader RNA (SL RNA) sequence was developed recently. This study assessed the SL RNA assay performance combined with a crude extraction method for the detection of Leishmania in field-collected and laboratory-reared sand flies and in tissue samples from hyraxes as reservoir hosts.

METHODS

Field-collected and laboratory-infected sand fly and hyrax extracts were subjected to three different qPCR approaches to assess the suitability of the SL RNA target for Leishmania detection. Nucleic acids of experimentally infected sand flies were isolated with a crude extraction buffer with ethanol precipitation and a commercial kit and tested for downstream DNA and RNA detection. Promastigotes were isolated from culture and sand fly midguts to assess whether there was difference in SL RNA and kDNA copy numbers. Naive sand flies were spiked with a serial dilution of promastigotes to make a standard curve.

RESULTS

The qPCR targeting SL RNA performed well on infected sand fly samples, despite preservation and extraction under presumed unfavorable conditions for downstream RNA detection. Nucleic acid extraction by a crude extraction buffer combined with a precipitation step was highly compatible with downstream SL RNA and kDNA detection. Copy numbers of kDNA were found to be identical in culture-derived parasites and promastigotes isolated from sand fly midguts. SL RNA levels were slightly lower in sand fly promastigotes (ΔCq 1.7). The theoretical limit of detection and quantification of the SL RNA qPCR respectively reached down to 10 and 10 parasite equivalents. SL RNA detection in stored hyrax samples was less efficient with some false-negative assay results, most likely due to the long-term tissue storage in absence of RNA stabilizing reagents.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a crude extraction method in combination with the SL RNA qPCR assay is suitable for the detection and quantification of Leishmania in sand flies. The assay is inexpensive, sensitive and pan-Leishmania specific, and accordingly an excellent assay for high-throughput screening in entomological research.

摘要

背景

在生态流行病学研究中,通常使用高通量和敏感的分子方法来检测媒介和储存宿主中的利什曼原虫,这些方法针对小环酮体 DNA(kDNA)。最近开发了一种针对保守的剪接领导 RNA(SL RNA)序列的泛利什曼 SYBR 绿色定量 PCR(qPCR)检测方法。本研究评估了 SL RNA 检测方法与粗提取方法相结合,用于检测野外采集和实验室饲养的沙蝇以及作为储存宿主的蹄兔组织样本中的利什曼原虫。

方法

对野外采集和实验室感染的沙蝇和蹄兔提取物进行了三种不同的 qPCR 方法评估,以评估 SL RNA 靶标用于检测利什曼原虫的适用性。用粗提缓冲液和乙醇沉淀以及商业试剂盒从实验感染的沙蝇中分离核酸,并测试下游 DNA 和 RNA 的检测。从培养物和沙蝇中肠分离前体滋养体,以评估 SL RNA 和 kDNA 拷贝数是否存在差异。用前体滋养体的系列稀释液对幼稚沙蝇进行接种,以制作标准曲线。

结果

尽管在下游 RNA 检测的假定不利条件下进行了保存和提取,但针对感染沙蝇样本的 qPCR 靶向 SL RNA 表现良好。用粗提缓冲液和沉淀步骤进行的核酸提取与下游 SL RNA 和 kDNA 的检测高度兼容。在培养物来源的寄生虫和从沙蝇中肠分离的前体滋养体中,kDNA 的拷贝数相同。沙蝇前体滋养体中的 SL RNA 水平略低(ΔCq 1.7)。SL RNA qPCR 的理论检测限和定量限分别达到 10 和 10 个寄生虫当量。在没有 RNA 稳定试剂的情况下,长期组织储存导致Stored hyrax 样本中的 SL RNA 检测效率较低,存在一些假阴性检测结果。

结论

本研究表明,粗提方法与 SL RNA qPCR 检测相结合,适用于沙蝇中利什曼原虫的检测和定量。该检测方法价格低廉、敏感且具有泛利什曼原虫特异性,因此非常适合在昆虫学研究中进行高通量筛选。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0144/7268266/9e05088287d4/13071_2020_4141_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验