Suppr超能文献

在晚期卵巢癌、输卵管癌和原发性腹膜癌的初次肿瘤细胞减灭术中使用消融和超声吸引术。

Use of ablation and ultrasonic aspiration at primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jul;30(7):1052-1057. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001466. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ovarian cancer patients with miliary disease have the lowest rates of complete surgical resection and poorest survival. Adjunct surgical techniques may potentially increase rates of complete surgical resection. No studies have evaluated the use of these techniques in primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer patients with miliary disease. The aim of this study was to examine the use of adjunct surgical techniques during primary debulking surgery for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer with miliary disease.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IIIC-IVB epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with miliary disease undergoing primary debulking surgery from January 2010 to December 2014 were reviewed. Adjunct surgical techniques were defined as ultrasonic surgical aspiration, argon enhanced electrocautery, thermal plasma energy, and traditional electrocautery ablation. Patients undergoing surgery with and without these devices were compared with respect to demographics, operative characteristics, postoperative complications, residual disease, progression free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients with miliary disease underwent primary debulking surgery, of which 30 (22.2%) patients used adjunct surgical techniques. The most common devices were ultrasonic surgical aspiration (40%) and argon enhanced electrocautery (36.7%). The most common sites of use were diaphragm (63.3%), pelvic peritoneum (30%), bowel mesentery (20%), and large bowel serosa (20%). There were no differences in age, stage, primary site, histology, operative time, surgical complexity, or postoperative complications for patients operated on with or without these devices. Volume of residual disease was similar (0.1-1 cm: 60% with adjunct techniques versus 68.6% without; complete surgical resection: 16.7% with adjunct techniques versus 13.3% without; p=0.67). For patients with ≤1 cm residual disease, median progression free survival (15 versus 15 months, p=0.65) and median overall survival (40 versus 55 months, p=0.38) were also similar.

CONCLUSION

Adjunct surgical techniques may be incorporated during primary debulking surgery for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with miliary disease; however, these do not improve the rate of optimal cytoreduction.

摘要

目的

患有粟粒性疾病的卵巢癌患者完全手术切除的比例最低,生存率最差。辅助手术技术可能会提高完全手术切除的比例。目前尚无研究评估这些技术在患有粟粒性疾病的卵巢癌患者的初次肿瘤细胞减灭术中的应用。本研究旨在探讨在患有国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期为 IIIIC-IVB 期的上皮性卵巢癌、输卵管癌或原发性腹膜癌且伴有粟粒性疾病的患者中,在初次肿瘤细胞减灭术中应用辅助手术技术的情况。

方法

回顾性分析 2010 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间接受初次肿瘤细胞减灭术的国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期为 IIIIC-IVB 期上皮性卵巢癌、输卵管癌或原发性腹膜癌且伴有粟粒性疾病的患者的病历资料。辅助手术技术定义为超声外科吸引术、氩气增强电凝术、热等离子体能量和传统电凝消融术。比较了使用和未使用这些设备的患者在人口统计学、手术特征、术后并发症、残留疾病、无进展生存期和总生存期方面的差异。

结果

共 135 例患有粟粒性疾病的患者接受了初次肿瘤细胞减灭术,其中 30 例(22.2%)患者使用了辅助手术技术。最常用的设备是超声外科吸引术(40%)和氩气增强电凝术(36.7%)。最常使用的部位是膈肌(63.3%)、盆腔腹膜(30%)、肠系膜(20%)和大肠浆膜(20%)。使用和未使用这些设备的患者在年龄、分期、原发部位、组织学、手术时间、手术复杂性或术后并发症方面均无差异。残留疾病的体积相似(0.1-1cm:60%使用辅助技术与 68.6%未使用;完全手术切除:16.7%使用辅助技术与 13.3%未使用;p=0.67)。对于残留疾病≤1cm 的患者,中位无进展生存期(15 个月与 15 个月,p=0.65)和中位总生存期(40 个月与 55 个月,p=0.38)也相似。

结论

在患有高级上皮性卵巢癌、输卵管癌或原发性腹膜癌且伴有粟粒性疾病的患者中,辅助手术技术可在初次肿瘤细胞减灭术中应用;但这些技术并不能提高理想的肿瘤细胞减灭率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验