• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Pipeline Vantage 栓塞装置伴 Shield 技术的临床前安全性和有效性评价。

Preclinical safety and efficacy evaluation of the Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology.

机构信息

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

Neurovascular, Medtronic plc, Irvine, California, USA.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Oct;12(10):981-986. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016043. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016043
PMID:32487767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7509525/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology is a next generation flow diverter developed to improve aneurysm occlusion and implant endothelialization in addition to lowering thrombogenicity. We report here the in vivo biocompatibility and in vitro hemocompatibility performance of the Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology (Vantage) compared with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device (Flex).

METHODS

Biocompatibility (via histology), aneurysm occlusion and vessel patency (via angiography), and endothelial coverage (via scanning electron microscopy (SEM)) for the Vantage and Flex devices were assessed in the rabbit elastase aneurysm model at 90 days (n=29) and 180 days (n=27). In vitro thrombogenicity for Flex and Vantage (n=16) was assessed using a human blood flow loop model at low heparin concentration (0.6 U/mL) with thrombin generation, platelet activation and thrombus visualization as outputs.

RESULTS

Raymond Roy Occlusion Classification grade 1 was higher for Vantage (61%) compared with Flex (46%), but was not statistically significant (p>0.05). All branch vessels were patent. Histological measures for both devices were similar (p>0.05). Endothelial coverage of the implant was significantly better for Vantage compared with Flex (p<0.05). In vitro measurements of thrombin generation (thrombin-antithrombin complex (µg/mL): Vantage 0.49±0.45; Flex 10.57±9.84) and platelet activation (β-thromboglobulin (IU/µl): Vantage 0.41±0.19; Flex 4.14±2.38) were both statistically lower (p0.05) for Vantage compared with Flex. High resolution microscopy showed less accumulation of thrombus on Vantage as compared with Flex.

CONCLUSION

Vantage improved aneurysm occlusion and implant endothelialization and had significantly lower thrombogenicity as compared with Flex, while preserving the biocompatibility safety profile of Flex.

摘要

背景

Pipeline Vantage 栓塞装置 Shield Technology 是一种新一代的血流转向装置,旨在提高动脉瘤闭塞率和植入物内皮化,并降低血栓形成性。我们在此报告 Pipeline Vantage 栓塞装置 Shield Technology(Vantage)与 Pipeline Flex 栓塞装置(Flex)的体内生物相容性和体外血液相容性性能。

方法

在 90 天(n=29)和 180 天(n=27)的兔弹性蛋白酶动脉瘤模型中,通过组织学评估 Vantage 和 Flex 装置的生物相容性(通过组织学评估)、动脉瘤闭塞和血管通畅性(通过血管造影评估)以及内皮覆盖(通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估)。在低肝素浓度(0.6 U/mL)下,使用人体血流回路模型评估 Flex 和 Vantage(n=16)的体外血栓形成性,以血栓生成、血小板活化和血栓可视化作为输出。

结果

Vantage 的 Raymond Roy 闭塞分级 1 级(61%)高于 Flex(46%),但无统计学意义(p>0.05)。所有分支血管均通畅。两种装置的组织学测量值相似(p>0.05)。Vantage 对植入物的内皮覆盖明显优于 Flex(p<0.05)。体外测量的血栓生成(凝血酶-抗凝血酶复合物(µg/mL):Vantage 0.49±0.45;Flex 10.57±9.84)和血小板活化(β-血栓球蛋白(IU/µl):Vantage 0.41±0.19;Flex 4.14±2.38)均明显低于 Flex(p<0.05)。高分辨率显微镜显示,与 Flex 相比,Vantage 上血栓的积聚较少。

结论

与 Flex 相比,Vantage 提高了动脉瘤闭塞率和植入物内皮化,血栓形成性显著降低,同时保持了 Flex 的生物相容性安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d541/7509525/5408a46d3a4a/neurintsurg-2020-016043f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d541/7509525/5408a46d3a4a/neurintsurg-2020-016043f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d541/7509525/5408a46d3a4a/neurintsurg-2020-016043f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Preclinical safety and efficacy evaluation of the Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology.Pipeline Vantage 栓塞装置伴 Shield 技术的临床前安全性和有效性评价。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Oct;12(10):981-986. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016043. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
2
Thrombogenicity assessment of Pipeline Flex, Pipeline Shield, and FRED flow diverters in an in vitro human blood physiological flow loop model.在体外人体血液生理流循环模型中评估 Pipeline Flex、Pipeline Shield 和 FRED 血流导向装置的血栓形成性。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018 Dec;106(12):3195-3202. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36514. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
3
Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology: angiographic and safety outcomes at 1-year follow-up.采用 Pipeline Flex 栓塞装置联合 Shield 技术治疗颅内动脉瘤:1 年随访时的血管造影和安全性结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Apr;11(4):396-399. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014204. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Diffusion-weighted imaging lesions after intracranial aneurysm treatment with Pipeline Flex and Pipeline Flex with Shield technology: a retrospective cohort analysis.使用Pipeline Flex及带Shield技术的Pipeline Flex治疗颅内动脉瘤后的扩散加权成像病变:一项回顾性队列分析
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Mar 14;16(4):385-391. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020250.
5
Pipeline Flex embolisation device with Shield Technology for the treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms: periprocedural and 6 month outcomes.采用Shield技术的Pipeline Flex栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤患者:围手术期及6个月结果
Neuroradiol J. 2020 Dec;33(6):471-478. doi: 10.1177/1971400920966749. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Safety and Effectiveness of the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device With Shield Technology for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Midterm Results From a Multicenter Study.Pipeline Flex 栓塞装置联合 Shield 技术治疗颅内动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:多中心研究的中期结果。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jul 1;87(1):104-111. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz356.
7
Comparison of PED/PED Flex and PED Shield in the treatment of unruptured intracerebral aneurysms.PED/PED Flex 与 PED 盾在未破裂颅内动脉瘤治疗中的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Aug 25;140(2):436-440. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.JNS23981. Print 2024 Feb 1.
8
Outcome Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology in Unruptured Aneurysms (PEDSU).Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗未破裂动脉瘤的结果研究(PEDSU)。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Dec;40(12):2094-2101. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6314. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Thrombogenicity assessment of Pipeline, Pipeline Shield, Derivo and P64 flow diverters in an in vitro pulsatile flow human blood loop model.在体外脉动流人体血液回路模型中对Pipeline、Pipeline Shield、Derivo和P64血流导向装置的血栓形成性评估。
eNeurologicalSci. 2019 Jan 8;14:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2019.01.004. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
Multicenter Experience with the Pipeline Flex and Vantage with Shield Technology for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment.颅内动脉瘤治疗中Pipeline Flex 和 Vantage with Shield 技术的多中心经验。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct 3;45(10):1488-1494. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8352.

引用本文的文献

1
Coil and flow diverting stents as drug delivery platforms for cerebral aneurysm treatment.作为用于脑动脉瘤治疗的药物递送平台的线圈和血流导向支架。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 27:2025.06.24.661344. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.24.661344.
2
Initial Experience with the Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pipeline Vantage血流导向装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的初步经验:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Mar 4;46(3):510-516. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8555.
3
Fourth-generation Pipeline Vantage flow diversion: First reported US experience of safety and feasibility.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of Complications, Functional Outcome, and Morbidity in a Large Cohort Treated With Flow Diversion.采用血流导向装置治疗的大样本队列的并发症、功能结局和发病率的预测因素。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Sep 15;87(4):730-743. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz508.
2
Overview of Different Flow Diverters and Flow Dynamics.不同类型的血流导向装置和血流动力学概述。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(Suppl 1):S21-S34. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz323.
3
Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment: Trials Involving Flow Diverters and Long-Term Outcomes.血流导向装置治疗颅内动脉瘤:涉及血流导向装置的试验和长期结果。
第四代Pipeline Vantage血流导向装置:美国首次报道的安全性和可行性经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Dec 5:15910199241301119. doi: 10.1177/15910199241301119.
4
Safety and efficacy of coated flow diverters in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms during single antiplatelet therapy: A multicenter study.单药抗血小板治疗期间带涂层血流导向装置治疗脑动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:一项多中心研究。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Dec;30(6):819-826. doi: 10.1177/15910199241286542. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
5
Multicenter Experience with the Pipeline Flex and Vantage with Shield Technology for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment.颅内动脉瘤治疗中Pipeline Flex 和 Vantage with Shield 技术的多中心经验。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct 3;45(10):1488-1494. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8352.
6
Flow Diversion for Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Past, Present, and Future Directions.颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的血流导向:过去、现在与未来方向
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 16;13(14):4167. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144167.
7
Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于治疗颅内动脉瘤的Pipeline Vantage栓塞装置:系统评价与荟萃分析
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jul 25:15910199241264340. doi: 10.1177/15910199241264340.
8
Comparison of Flow Reduction Efficacy of Nominal and Oversized Flow Diverters Using a Novel Measurement-assisted in Silico Method.使用新型测量辅助的计算方法比较标称和超大口径血流导向装置的血流减少效果。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep;34(3):675-684. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01404-4. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
9
Intraluminal Flow Diverter Design Primer for Neurointerventionalists.神经介入医师腔内血流导向装置设计入门
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Apr 8;45(4):365-370. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8076.
10
Outcome study of the Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device (second version) in unruptured (and ruptured) aneurysms (PEDVU(R) study).Pipeline Vantage 栓塞装置(第二代)治疗未破裂(和破裂)动脉瘤的结果研究(PEDVU(R) 研究)。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Oct 14;16(11):1136-1144. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020754.
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(Suppl 1):S36-S45. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz345.
4
Prospective study to assess the tissue response to HPC-coated p48 flow diverter stents compared to uncoated devices in the rabbit carotid artery model.在兔颈动脉模型中,对涂有HPC的p48血流导向支架与未涂层装置相比的组织反应进行评估的前瞻性研究。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2019 Dec 5;3(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41747-019-0128-z.
5
Safety and Effectiveness of the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device With Shield Technology for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Midterm Results From a Multicenter Study.Pipeline Flex 栓塞装置联合 Shield 技术治疗颅内动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:多中心研究的中期结果。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jul 1;87(1):104-111. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz356.
6
Endothelial dysfunction in cerebral aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤的血管内皮功能障碍。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Jul 1;47(1):E3. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS19221.
7
Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results.颅内动脉瘤Pipeline 装置栓塞的前瞻性研究:PREMIER 研究 1 年结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jan;12(1):62-66. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015091. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
8
Pipeline embolisation device with shield technology for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm.采用屏蔽技术的管道栓塞装置用于治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤。
Neuroradiol J. 2019 Jun;32(3):189-192. doi: 10.1177/1971400919834692. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
9
Thrombogenicity assessment of Pipeline, Pipeline Shield, Derivo and P64 flow diverters in an in vitro pulsatile flow human blood loop model.在体外脉动流人体血液回路模型中对Pipeline、Pipeline Shield、Derivo和P64血流导向装置的血栓形成性评估。
eNeurologicalSci. 2019 Jan 8;14:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2019.01.004. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
In vivo canine study of three different coatings applied to p64 flow-diverter stents: initial biocompatibility study.应用于p64血流导向支架的三种不同涂层的体内犬类研究:初步生物相容性研究。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2019 Jan 22;3(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41747-018-0084-z.