Suppr超能文献

第四代Pipeline Vantage血流导向装置:美国首次报道的安全性和可行性经验。

Fourth-generation Pipeline Vantage flow diversion: First reported US experience of safety and feasibility.

作者信息

Sweid Ahmad, Chahine Ahmad, Hage Stephanie, Morsi Rami Z, Thind Sonam, Karar Lina, Baskaran Archit, Carrión-Penagos Julián, Desai Harsh, Kothari Sachin A, Rana Rohini, Verhagen Metman Okker, Zakaria Jehad, Siegler James E, Awad Issam, Hurley Michael C, Prabhakaran Shyam, Polster Sean, Kass-Hout Tareq

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Dec 5:15910199241301119. doi: 10.1177/15910199241301119.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pipeline Vantage embolization device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA) is the fourth generation of Pipeline flow diverter devices, offering numerous technical improvements. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of The Pipeline Vantage embolization device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study describing the use of The Pipeline Vantage embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Technical feasibility and safety were assessed in terms of intra and postprocedural complications, as well as neurological morbidity upon follow-up. Both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were included.

RESULTS

We included 12 patients in our study (mean age 62; females:  = 9/12, 75%). Aneurysm morphology varied between saccular (41.6%), fusiform (41.6%), blister (8.3%), and pseudoaneurysm (8.3%). Three cases (25%) involved ruptured aneurysms treated in the acute setting. A transradial access was used in 10 cases (83.3%). There was a 100% success in deployment. Seven cases (58.3%) were treated with adjunct embolization device other than a flow diversion. Eight cases (66.6%) were treated with a single flow diversion, three cases (25%) were treated with two flow diversion, and one case (8.3%) was treated with three flow diversion stents. There were no intraoperative complications. There was one postprocedural complication in a dissecting ruptured PICA aneurysm that was ultimately treated with two flow diversion stents and an intrasaccular device.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first US series assessing the periprocedural safety and feasibility of consecutive patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Vantage device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA).

摘要

背景

Pipeline Vantage栓塞装置(美敦力公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市)是第四代血流导向栓塞装置,有多项技术改进。本研究旨在评估Pipeline Vantage栓塞装置(美敦力公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市)的可行性和安全性。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性研究,描述了Pipeline Vantage栓塞装置用于治疗颅内动脉瘤的情况。从术中及术后并发症以及随访时的神经功能障碍方面评估技术可行性和安全性。纳入了破裂和未破裂的动脉瘤。

结果

我们的研究纳入了12例患者(平均年龄62岁;女性:9/12,75%)。动脉瘤形态包括囊状(41.6%)、梭形(41.6%)、水泡状(8.3%)和假性动脉瘤(8.3%)。3例(25%)涉及急性情况下治疗的破裂动脉瘤。10例(83.3%)采用经桡动脉入路。装置植入成功率为100%。7例(58.3%)除血流导向外还使用了辅助栓塞装置。8例(66.6%)采用单一血流导向治疗,3例(25%)采用两个血流导向治疗,1例(8.3%)采用三个血流导向支架治疗。术中无并发症。1例术后并发症发生在一例夹层破裂的小脑后下动脉动脉瘤,最终采用两个血流导向支架和一个囊内装置治疗。

讨论

据我们所知,这是美国首个评估连续颅内动脉瘤患者使用Pipeline Vantage装置(美敦力公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市)围手术期安全性和可行性的系列研究。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验