Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (Drs Phillips II, Janulis, Beach, and Greene and Messrs Lindeman and Boegner); Evaluation, Data Integration, and Technical Assistance Program, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (Drs Phillips II, Beach, and Greene and Messrs Lindeman, Boegner, and Raman); Center for Gender, Sexuality and HIV Prevention, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Johnson); AIDS Foundation of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Johnson); and HIV/STI Bureau, Chicago Department of Public Health, Chicago, Illinois (Messrs Stonehouse and Kern).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(2):143-151. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001165.
The public health response to the HIV epidemic has increasingly centered on the uptake of and adherence to biomedical interventions (eg, pre-exposure prophylaxis [PrEP], treatment as prevention [TasP]). Traditionally, various community and health care organizations have worked to address different stages of PrEP or TasP care.
To understand the importance of how HIV prevention organizations providing these services interact to provide the comprehensive care needed for successful HIV and PrEP continuum outcomes.
Utilizing an Organizational Network Survey, network ties were examined between formal and informal partnerships among community agencies.
This study examined community agencies in the current HIV prevention system in Chicago.
Seventy-two community agencies across the Chicago metropolitan area.
Using network analysis, this study examined ties between community agencies and assessed perceptions of collaboration and competitiveness in the current HIV prevention system in Chicago.
Overall, respondents reported that the current environment of HIV prevention in Chicago was extremely (18.8%), moderately (37.5%), or somewhat collaborative (37.5%) and extremely (68.8%) or moderately competitive (25.0%). The majority of partnerships reported were informal, with less than a quarter being formalized. That said, those who reported formal partnerships reported being satisfied with those relationships. There was a significantly negative association between density and perceived collaboration-grantees experiencing a more collaborative also reported less dense networks.
These findings indicate that, despite perceived competitiveness, agencies are willing to work together and create a cohesive HIV prevention and treatment system. However, more work should be done to foster an environment that can support the formation of partnerships, to improve a coordinated response to providing HIV care, and sustain mutually beneficial relationships.
公共卫生部门对艾滋病病毒(HIV)疫情的应对措施越来越侧重于采用和坚持生物医学干预措施(例如,暴露前预防[PrEP]、治疗即预防[TasP])。传统上,各种社区和医疗保健组织一直致力于解决 PrEP 或 TasP 护理的不同阶段。
了解提供这些服务的 HIV 预防组织如何相互作用以提供成功的 HIV 和 PrEP 连续护理所需的综合护理的重要性。
利用组织网络调查,研究了社区机构之间的正式和非正式伙伴关系的网络联系。
本研究调查了芝加哥当前 HIV 预防系统中的社区机构。
芝加哥大都市区的 72 家社区机构。
使用网络分析,本研究检查了社区机构之间的联系,并评估了芝加哥当前 HIV 预防系统中的合作和竞争意识。
总体而言,受访者报告说,芝加哥当前的 HIV 预防环境非常(18.8%)、中度(37.5%)或有些合作(37.5%),并且非常(68.8%)或中度竞争(25.0%)。报告的大多数伙伴关系是非正式的,不到四分之一是正式的。也就是说,那些报告有正式伙伴关系的人对这些关系表示满意。密度与感知协作之间存在显著负相关-获得者经历更协作的报告也报告网络密度较低。
这些发现表明,尽管存在竞争意识,但各机构愿意共同努力,建立一个有凝聚力的 HIV 预防和治疗系统。然而,应该做更多的工作来营造一个能够支持伙伴关系形成的环境,以改善协调一致的提供 HIV 护理的应对措施,并维持互利关系。