Ji Zhao-Chen, Hu Hai-Yin, Li Nan, Wang Ke-Yi, Jin Xin-Yao, Pang Wen-Tai, Feng Rui, Zhang Jun-Hua
Evidence-based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Tianjin 300193, China.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2020 Apr;45(8):1844-1850. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20190905.501.
Currently, the quantity of clinic research, Meta-analysis and overview of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) were advanced annually. The secondary researches can support to more evidential reference for clinic decision, policy design etc. Meanwhile, the need of expedite and valuable evidence was increasingly. This study was collected published overview of system review of TCM by CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed, PudMed, Cochrane Library and Ovid database. The characteristic data extraction were included: title, type of literature, author and nationality, published year, quantity of subject, quantity of original documents included, Chinese and English databases searched, type of disease, intervention, study result(positive/negative), adverse reaction, quality assessment tool, study limitation, level of evidence etc. Base these data above, to summarize the overview of system reviews of TCM by bibliometrics and overview analysis.
目前，中医临床研究、Meta分析及综述的数量逐年增加。二次研究可为临床决策、政策制定等提供更多循证参考。同时，对快速且有价值证据的需求也日益增加。本研究通过中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、考克兰图书馆和Ovid数据库收集已发表的中医系统评价综述。特征数据提取包括：标题、文献类型、作者及国籍、发表年份、研究对象数量、纳入的原始文献数量、检索的中英文数据库、疾病类型、干预措施、研究结果（阳性/阴性）、不良反应、质量评估工具、研究局限性、证据水平等。基于上述数据，采用文献计量学和综述分析方法总结中医系统评价综述情况。
