Kashihara Jun, Sakamoto Shinji
College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, 3-25-40 Sakurajosui, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 156-8550 Japan.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 235 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC 3053 Australia.
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 May 24;14:34. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00366-7. eCollection 2020.
Early interventions for depression among youth are greatly needed. Although Youth Mental Health First Aid (YMHFA) program has been developed to teach the public how to help young people with mental disorders, including depression, it has assumed human altruism and overlooked the possibility that participants would experience conflict between the costs and benefits of helping behaviors. The present qualitative study, therefore, initially explored content of the costs and benefits perceived by youth in terms of helping their peers with depression.
A total of 56 Japanese undergraduates (32 female, 24 male; = 20.20, = 1.09) participated in the face-to-face survey. They were provided with basic knowledge about helping behaviors and were presented with a vignette describing an undergraduate with depression. Then, they left free descriptive comments on their views of the costs/benefits of helping/not helping the person in the vignette. As supplemental quantitative analyses, we statistically compared numbers of labels ( = 624), which were obtained from participants' comments, across two (costs/benefits) × two (helping/not helping) domains. Finally, we conducted a qualitative content analysis that combined inductive and deductive methods to categorize these labels.
The supplemental quantitative analyses (i.e., ANOVA and post hoc analyses) on the numbers of labels highlighted that the participants perceived suppressors (i.e., , ) as well as motivators (i.e., ) in making decision to help peers with depression. The qualitative content analysis mainly showed that: (i) the categories in each domain covered multiple facets of costs and benefits, including negative/positive effects on the participants themselves, the person in the vignette, and interpersonal relationships; and that (ii) the participants perceived the conflicts of costs and benefits regardless of whether they help their peers with depression.
These results provide evidence for how young people experience the conflicts between the costs and benefits of helping behaviors toward their peers with depression and reveal specific content of these costs and benefits. These findings could serve as a basis for extending YMHFA programs and designing educational content to promote public helping behaviors in realistic situations.
青少年抑郁症的早期干预非常必要。尽管青少年心理健康急救(YMHFA)项目旨在教导公众如何帮助患有精神疾病(包括抑郁症)的年轻人,但该项目假定了人类的利他主义,却忽视了参与者可能会在帮助行为的成本与收益之间经历冲突的可能性。因此,本定性研究最初探讨了青少年在帮助患有抑郁症的同龄人方面所感知到的成本和收益的内容。
共有56名日本本科生(32名女性,24名男性;平均年龄=20.20岁,标准差=1.09)参与了面对面调查。他们获得了关于帮助行为的基本知识,并阅读了一个描述一名患有抑郁症的本科生的 vignette(短文)。然后,他们就自己对帮助/不帮助短文中的人所涉及的成本/收益的看法留下自由描述性评论。作为补充性定量分析,我们对从参与者评论中获得的标签数量(=624)在两个(成本/收益)×两个(帮助/不帮助)领域进行了统计比较。最后,我们进行了定性内容分析,结合归纳和演绎方法对这些标签进行分类。
对标签数量的补充性定量分析(即方差分析和事后分析)突出显示,参与者在决定帮助患有抑郁症的同龄人时既感知到了抑制因素(即, )也感知到了激励因素(即, )。定性内容分析主要表明:(i)每个领域的类别涵盖了成本和收益的多个方面,包括对参与者自身、短文中的人以及人际关系的负面/正面影响;以及(ii)无论是否帮助患有抑郁症的同龄人,参与者都感知到了成本和收益的冲突。
这些结果为年轻人如何体验针对患有抑郁症的同龄人帮助行为的成本与收益之间的冲突提供了证据,并揭示了这些成本和收益的具体内容。这些发现可为扩展YMHFA项目以及设计教育内容以促进现实情境中的公众帮助行为提供基础。