Li Jiarui, Kan Haoxuan, Zhao Lin, Sun Zhao, Bai Chunmei
Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100032, China.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 May 18;12:1758835920922028. doi: 10.1177/1758835920922028. eCollection 2020.
Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy offers minor benefit to patients with mucosal melanoma (MM). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the preferred approach in patients with advanced or metastatic cutaneous melanoma, the evidence of their clinical use for MM is still limited. This systematic review aims to summarize the efficacy and safety of ICIs in advanced or metastatic MM.
We searched electronic databases, conference abstracts, clinical trial registers and reference lists for relevant studies. The primary outcomes included the overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), one-year PFS rate, and one-year OS rate.
This review identified 13 studies assessing anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, 22 studies assessing anti-PD-1 monotherapy, two studies assessing anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 combination therapy, one study assessing anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with axitinib, and three studies assessing anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with radiotherapy. For most patients who received ipilimumab monotherapy, the ORR ranged from 0% to 17%, the median PFS was less than 5 months, and the median OS was less than 10 months. For patients who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy, most studies showed an ORR of more than 15% and a median OS of more than 11 months. The combined administration of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 agents showed benefits over single-agent therapy with an ORR of more than 33.3%. In a phase Ib trial of toripalimab in combination with axitinib, approximately half of patients had complete or partial responses. Three retrospective studies that investigated anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with radiotherapy showed an ORR of more than 50%, which was higher than each single modality treatment.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies alone and in combination with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies or other modalities, are promising treatment options for advanced or metastatic MM. However, high-level evidence is still needed to support the clinical application.
传统的细胞毒性化疗对黏膜黑色素瘤(MM)患者益处不大。尽管免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已成为晚期或转移性皮肤黑色素瘤患者的首选治疗方法,但其用于MM的临床证据仍然有限。本系统评价旨在总结ICI在晚期或转移性MM中的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了电子数据库、会议摘要、临床试验注册库和参考文献列表以查找相关研究。主要结局包括总缓解率(ORR)、中位无进展生存期(PFS)、中位总生存期(OS)、一年PFS率和一年OS率。
本评价纳入了13项评估抗CTLA-4单药治疗的研究、22项评估抗PD-1单药治疗的研究、2项评估抗CTLA-4与抗PD-1联合治疗的研究、1项评估抗PD-1抗体联合阿昔替尼的研究以及3项评估抗PD-1抗体联合放疗的研究。对于大多数接受伊匹木单抗单药治疗的患者,ORR为0%至17%,中位PFS小于5个月,中位OS小于10个月。对于接受纳武利尤单抗或帕博利珠单抗单药治疗的患者,大多数研究显示ORR超过15%,中位OS超过11个月。抗CTLA-4和抗PD-1药物联合使用比单药治疗更具优势,ORR超过33.3%。在一项托瑞帕利单抗联合阿昔替尼的Ib期试验中,约一半患者获得完全或部分缓解。三项调查抗PD-1抗体联合放疗的回顾性研究显示ORR超过50%,高于每种单一治疗方式。
免疫检查点抑制剂,尤其是单独使用抗PD-1单克隆抗体以及与抗CTLA-4单克隆抗体或其他治疗方式联合使用,是晚期或转移性MM有前景的治疗选择。然而,仍需要高级别证据支持其临床应用。